The study investigated the influence of varying amounts of air/water spray and the energy used by an erbium, chromium:yttrium–scandium–gallium–garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) 2,780 nm laser when treating dental tissues. The morphological effects produced by the laser interaction on healthy human enamel were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The vestibular and lingual surfaces of ten molars were treated with laser at different power settings; each surface was subdivided into cervical, median, and occlusal parts and treated with different proportions of water spray; the series contained 60 tooth portions. Treatment differed in terms of power setting and air/water percentage. All specimens were then subjected to dehydration and metallisation. At SEM evaluation, the classic aspect of laser-treated enamel was visible: grooves, flakes, shelves and sharp edges, indicative of micro-explosion rather than melting. Vaporisation of the tissue created a clear delimitation from surrounding healthy tissue, with partial respect to the prismatic structure of the treated enamel. The aspect of the enamel was rarely type 1 Silverstone but more frequently type 2 or 3, with prismatic structure not respected and/or completely disordered. These morphological differences appeared to be correlated with the inclination of the laser beam aimed at the enamel prisms and with the percentage of air/water used. The laser system analysed showed itself to be effective at removing human dental enamel. The results appeared to be closely correlated with the variation of the percentage of the laser's water–air spray.
Erbium, chromium:yttrium–scandium–gallium–garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) laser Water spray Enamel Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Surface morphology
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The SEM image resulted from collaboration with the University of Siena (Italy) and the Institute of Normal Human Anatomy (Head: Prof. L. Fonzi). We thank Prof. Fonzi for his support in producing these images.
Keller U, Hibst R (1989) Ablative effects of an Er:YAG laser on enamel and dentin. Dtsch Zahnarztl 44:600–602Google Scholar
Tokonabe H, Kouji R, Watanabe H, Nakamura Y, Matsumoto K (1999) Morphological changes of human teeth with Er:YAG laser irradiation. J Clin Laser Med Surg 17:7–12PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Nakamura G, Matsumoto K (1999) Ablation depths and morphological changes in human enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Surg 17:105–109PubMedGoogle Scholar
Shigetani Y, Okamoto A, Abu-Bakr N, Tanabe K, Kondo S, Iwaku M (2002) A study of cavity preparation by Er:YAG laser—observation of hard tooth structures by laser scanning microscope and examination of the time necessary to remove caries. J Dent Mater 21:20–23Google Scholar
Mir M, Meister J, Franzen R, Sabounchi SS, Lampert F, Gutknecht N (2007) Influence of water-layer thickness on Er:YAG laser ablation of enamel of bovine anterior teeth. Lasers Med Sci 23:451–457Google Scholar
Dostálová T, Jelínková H, Krejsa O, Hamal K, Kubelka J, Procházka S, Himmlová L (1997) Dentin and pulp response to erbium:YAG laser ablation: a preliminary evaluation of human teeth. J Clin Laser Med Surg 15:117–121PubMedGoogle Scholar
Glockner K, Rumpler J, Ebeleseder K, Städtler P (1998) Intrapulpal temperature during preparation with the Er:YAG laser compared to the conventional burr: an in vitro study. J Clin Laser Med Surg 16:153–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
Meister J, Franzen R, Forner K, Grebe H, Stanzel S, Lampert F, Apel C (2006) Influence of the water content in dental enamel and dentin on ablation with erbium YAG and erbium YSGG lasers. J Biomed Opt 11:034030. doi:10.1117/1.2204028CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olivi G, Genovese MD (2007) Effect of Er:YAG laser on enamel: SEM observations. J Oral Laser Appl 7:27–35Google Scholar
Kang HW, Rizoiu I, Welch AJ (2007) Hard tissue ablation with a spray-assisted mid-IR laser. Phys Med Biol 52:7243–7259CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar