Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 819–823

Confocal laser scanning microscopy—evaluation of native tissue sections in micrographic surgery

  • Sabine Kaeb
  • Michael Landthaler
  • Ulrich Hohenleutner
Brief Report

Abstract

Micrographic surgery is mainly used for excising basal cell carcinomas in high-risk body sites. The time-consuming process of frozen histopathology could be potentially accelerated by the application of ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy (CM). We examined the margins of 52 excised basal cell carcinomas by means of CM, and compared the results to conventional histological findings. For contrast enhancement, tissues were treated with 10% citric acid. The morphologic features of tumors seen in CM corresponded well to conventional light microscopy. Confocal assessment and light microscopical findings were consistent in 84.6%. If a tumor is clearly detectable by means of CM, the procedure of micrographic surgery can be accelerated. Negative confocal findings have yet to be confirmed by conventional microscopy. Applicability of CM is limited because of an inconsistent image quality that does not allow a reliable detection of small tumor nests. Further research into the handling of the samples and into specific contrast enhancement is necessary for CM to become a widely accepted procedure in micrographic surgery.

Keywords

Basal cell carcinoma Confocal laser scanning microscopy Micrographic surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Lear W, Dahlke E, Murray CA (2007) Basal cell carcinoma: review of epidemiology, pathogenesis, and associated risk factors. J Cutan Med Surg 11:19–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kopke LF, Konz B (1995) Micrographic surgery. A current methodological assessment. Hautarzt 46:607–614. doi:10.1007/s001050050306 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chung VQ, Dwyer PJ, Nehal KS et al (2004) Use of ex vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy during Mohs surgery for nonmelanoma skin cancers. Dermatol Surg 30:1470–1478. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30505.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boztepe G, Hohenleutner S, Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U (2004) Munich method of micrographic surgery for basal cell carcinomas: 5-years recurrence rates with life-table analysis. Acta Derm Venereol 84:218–222. doi:10.1080/00015550410025228 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rajadhyaksha M, Menaker G, Flotte T, Dwyer PJ, Gonzales S (2001) Confocal examination of nonmelanoma cancers in thick skin excisions to potentially guide Mohs micrographic surgery without frozen histopathology. J Invest Dermatol 117:1137–1143. doi:10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01524.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patel YG, Nehal KS, Aranda I, Li Y, Halpern AC, Rajadhyaksha M (2007) Confocal reflectance mosaicing of basal cell carcinomas in Mohs surgical skin excisions. J Biomed Opt 122:034027. doi:10.1117/1.2750294 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tannous Z, Torres A, Gonzalez S (2003) In vivo real-time confocal reflectance microscopy: a noninvasive guide for Mohs micrographic surgery facilitated by aluminium chloride, an excellent contrast enhancer. Dermatol Surg 29:839–846. doi:10.1046/j.1524-4725.2003.29219.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Al-Arashi MY, Salomatina E, Yaroslavsky AN (2007) Multimodal confocal microscopy for diagnosing nonmelanoma skin cancers. Lasers Surg Med 39:696–705. doi:10.1002/lsm.20578 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gareau DS, Li Y, Huang B, Eastman Z, Nehal KS, Rajadhyaksha M (2008) Confocal mosaicing microscopy in Mohs skin excisions: feasibility of rapid surgical pathology. J Biomed Opt 13:054001. doi:10.1117/1.2981828 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Ltd 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabine Kaeb
    • 1
  • Michael Landthaler
    • 1
  • Ulrich Hohenleutner
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity Hospital RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations