Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 217–221 | Cite as

Laser applications in oral surgery and implant dentistry

Review Article


Lasers have been used for many years in oral surgery and implant dentistry. In some indications, laser treatment has become state of the art as compared to conventional techniques. This article is a comprehensive review of new laser applications in oral surgery and implant dentistry. One of the most interesting developments over the last years was the introduction of the 9.6-μm CO2 laser. It has been shown in the recent literature that the use of this new device can preserve tissue with almost no adverse effects at the light microscopic level. In contrast, modifications of approved CO2 laser therapies of premalignant lesions resulted in higher recurrence rates than the conventional defocused laser technique. However, several studies indicate that other wavelengths such as Nd–YAG (λ = 1,064 nm) or diode lasers (λ = 810 nm) may be also of value in this field. In many other indications, the use of lasers is still experimental. Intraoperatively used photodynamic therapy or periimplant care of ailing implants with the CO2 laser seems to be more of value than conventional methods. However, further studies are required to assess standard protocols. Over the past years, research identified some new indications for laser treatment in oral surgery and implant dentistry. Moreover, well-known laser applications were defined as state of the art. Nevertheless, further studies are required for laser treatment in oral surgery and implant dentistry.


Laser Oral surgery Implant dentistry 


  1. 1.
    Eyrich G (2004) Hard-tissue drilling and cutting with a 9.6 μm CO2 laser. Med Habilitationsschrift, ZürichGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ivanenko M, Sader R, Afilal S, Werner M, Hartstock M, von Hanisch C, Milz S, Erhardt W, Zeilhofer H-F, Hering P (2005) In vivo animal trials with a scanning CO2 laser osteotome. Lasers Surg Med 37:144–148Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Horch H-H (1983) Laser Osteotomie und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten des Lasers in der oralen Weichteilchirurgie. Eine tierexperimentelle und klinische Studie. Berlin, QuintessenzGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Horch H-H, Deppe H (2004) Laser in der Zahnärztlichen Chirurgie und Mund-, Kiefer-und Gesichtschirurgie. In: Berlien H-P, Müller G (Hrsg.): Angew. Lasermedizin. Lehr- und Handbuch für Praxis und Klinik. Losebl.-Ausg. Landsberg, Ecomed, III. 3.3.1, S. 1–28Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deppe H, Hillemanns M, Hauck W (2004) Recurrence rates of premalignant lesions after CO2 laser vaporization. Med Laser Appl 19:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Deppe H, Horch H-H, Henke J, Donath K (2001) Peri-implant care of ailing implants with the carbon dioxide laser. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16:659–667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Horch H-H, Deppe H (2005) Lasers in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Med Laser Appl 20:47–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Weibrich G, Wahlmann U, Kunkel M, Reichert T, Wagner W (1999) Tissue damage and regeneration after laser surgery using different scanning systems. Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir 3:200–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Maiorana C, Salina S (2001) Oral soft tissue pathologies: long term evaluation after laser treatment. J Oral Laser Appl 1:20Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Crippa R (2001) Report on 103 cases of precancerous and other oral lesions treated with a diode laser. J Oral Laser Appl 1:26Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Broer NM, Liesenhoff T, Horch H-H (2004) Laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy for real-time tissue differentiation. Med Laser Appl 19:45–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kübler AC, Scheer M, Zoller JE (2001) Photodynamic therapy of head and neck cancer. Onkologie 24:230–237PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kuebler AC, de Carpentier J, Hopper C, Leonard AG, Putnam G (2001) Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the lip using Foscan-mediated photodynamic therapy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 30:504–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuebler AC, Stenzel W, Ruhling M, Meul B, Fischer JH (2003) Experimental evaluation of possible side effects of intra-operative photodynamic therapy on rabbit blood vessels and nerves. Lasers Surg Med 33:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zimmermann A, Ritsch-Marte M, Kostron H (2002) In vitro investigation of pH dependence of the absorption and fluorescence properties of the photosensitizer mTHPC. Photochem Photobiol 75:335–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zimmermann A, Ritsch-Marte M, Kostron H (2001) MTHPC-mediated photodynamic diagnosis of malignant brain tumors. Photochem Photobiol 74:611–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Park Ch-Y, Kim SG, Kim MD, Eom TG, Yoon JH, Ahn SG (2005) Surface properties of endosseous dental implants after NdYAG and CO2 laser treatment at various energies. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1522–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Deppe H, Horch H-H, Wagenpfeil S (2003) CO2-Laser-assistierte versus konventionelle Implantat-Dekontamination-Eine klinische Dreijahresstudie. Z Zahnärztl Impl 19:73–81Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bach G, Neckel C, Mall Ch, Krekeler G (2000) Conventional versus laser-assisted therapy of peri-implantitis: a five-year comparative study. Implant Dent 9:247–251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Haas R, Baron M, Dortbudak O, Watzek G (2000) Lethal photosensitization, autogenous bone, and e-PTFE membrane for the treatment of peri-implantitis: preliminary results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 15:374–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Romanos GE, Everts H, Nentwig GH (2000) Effects of diode and Nd:YAG laser irradiation on titanium discs: a scanning electron microscope examination. J Periodontol 71:810–815PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schwarz F, Sculean A, Rothamel D, Schwenzer K, Georg T, Becker J (2005) Clinical evaluation of an Er:YAG laser for nonsurgical treatment of peri-implantitis: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 16:44–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Neugebauer J (2005) Using photodynamic therapy to treat peri-implantitis. Interview. Dent Implantol Update 16:9–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwarz F, Jepsen S, Herten M, Sager M, Rothamel D, Becker J (2006) Influence of different treatment approaches on nunsubmerged and submerged healing of ligature induced peri-implant lesions. An experimental study in dogs. J Clin Periodontol 33:584–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ackermann K (1984) Neodym–YAG-Laser in der Zahnmedizin. Münch Med Wschr 126:1119–1121Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Oral and Craniomaxillofacial SurgeryKlinikum rechts der IsarMünchenGermany
  2. 2.Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-Kiefer-GesichtschirurgieTechnische Universität München, Klinikum rechts der IsarMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations