Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 23, Issue 2, pp 117–124 | Cite as

Micro-shear bond strength of Er:YAG-laser-treated dentin

  • Rubens C. R. de Carvalho
  • Patricia M. de Freitas
  • Masayuki Otsuki
  • Carlos P. de Eduardo
  • Junji Tagami
Original article

Abstract

This study tested if dentin adhesion is affected by Er:YAG laser. Ninety dentin disks were divided in groups (n = 10): G1, control; G2, Er:YAG laser 150 mJ, 90° contact, 38.8 J/cm2; G3, Er:YAG laser 70 mJ, 90° contact, 18.1 J/cm2; G4, Er:YAG laser 150 mJ, 90° non-contact, 1.44 J/cm2; G5, Er:YAG laser 70 mJ, 90° non-contact, 0.67 J/cm2; G6, Er:YAG laser 150 mJ, 45° contact, 37.5 J/cm2; G7, Er:YAG laser 70 mJ, 45° contact, 17.5 J/cm2; G8, Er:YAG laser 150 mJ, 45° non-contact, 1.55 J/cm2; and G9, Er:YAG laser 70 mJ, 45° non-contact, 0.72 J/cm2. Bonding procedures were carried out and the micro-shear-bond strength (MSBS) test was performed. The adhesive surfaces were analyzed under SEM. Two-way ANOVA and multiple comparison tests revealed that MSBS was significantly influenced by the laser irradiation (p < 0.05). Mean values (MPa) of the MSBS test were: G1 (44.97 ± 6.36), G2 (23.83 ± 2.46), G3 (30.26 ± 2.57), G4 (35.29 ± 3.74), G5 (41.90 ± 4.95), G6 (27.48 ± 2.11), G7 (34.61 ± 2.91), G8 (37.16 ± 1.96), and G9 (41.74 ± 1.60). It was concluded that the Er:YAG laser can constitute an alternative tool for dentin treatment before bonding procedures.

Keywords

Dentin Er:YAG laser Micro-shear bond strength Morphology Self-etching primers 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Tokyo Medical and Dental University and to the Committee of International Cooperation of the University of São Paulo (CCInt/USP) for making the present study feasible. In addition, we would like to thank the Kuraray (Japan), Kota (Brazil), and the State of São Paulo Research Foundation / FAPESP (São Paulo, Brazil).

References

  1. 1.
    Pashley DH (1990) Interaction of dental materials with dentin. Trans Acad Dent Mat 3:55–73Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Degrange M, Attal JP, Theimer K et al (1993) In vitro tests of dentin bonding systems. In: Vanherle G, Degrange M, Willems G (eds) State of the art on direct posterior filling materials and dentin bonding. Van der Poorten, Belgium, pp 205–225Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yoshiyama M, Carvalho R, Sano H, Horner JA, Brewer PD, Pashley DH (1996) Regional bond strengths of resins to human root dentin. J Dent 24:435–442PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prati C, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R, Pashley DH (1998) Resin-infiltrated dentin layer formation of new bonding systems. Oper Dent 23:185–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buonocore MG (1995) A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res 34:849–853Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hibst R (2002) Lasers for caries removal and cavity preparation: state of the art and future directions. J Oral Laser Appl 2:203–212Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hibst R, Keller U (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the ER:YAG laser on the dental hard substances: I measurement of the ablation rate. Lasers Surg Med 9:338–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keller U, Hibst R (1989) Experimental studies of the application of the Er:YAG laser on the dental hard substances: II light microscopic and SEM investigations. Lasers Surg Med 9:345–351PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Yamada Y, Kimura Y, Nakamura G, Matsumoto K (1999) Ablation depths and morphological changes in human enamel and dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Sur 17:105–109Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Visuri SR, Gilbert JL, Wright DD, Wigdor HA, Walsh JT Jr (1996) Shear strength of composite bonded to Er:YAG laser-prepared dentin. J Dent Res 75:599–605PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Niu W, Eto J, Kimura Y, Takeda FH, Matsumoto K (1998) A study on microleakage after resin filling of Class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser. J Clin Laser Med Sur 16:227–231Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wright GZ, McConnel RJ, Keller U (1993) Microleakage of Class V composite restorations prepared conventionally with those prepared with an Er:YAG laser: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent 15:425–426PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aoki A, Ishikawa I, Yamada T, Otsuki M, Watanabe H, Tagami J, Ando Y, Yamamoto H (1998) Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment in vitro. J Dent Res 77:1404–1441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ceballos L, Toledano M, Osorio R, Tay FR, Marshall GW (2002) Bonding to Er–YAG-laser-treated dentin. J Dent Res 8:119–122Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matsumoto K, Hossain M, Tsuzuki N, Yamada Y (2003) Morphological and compositional changes of human dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation. J Oral Laser Appl 3:15–20Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giachetti L, Russo DS, Scarpelli F, Vitale M (2004) SEM analysis of dentin treated with the Er:YAG laser: a pilot study of the consequences resulting from laser use on adhesion mechanisms. J Clin Laser Med Sur 22:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Shimada Y, Antonucci JM, Schumacher GE et al (1999) Effects of regional tooth structure and sectioning orientation on micro-shear bond strength. In: Tagami J, Toledano M, Prati C (eds) Advanced adhesive dentistry, International Kuraray Symposium, Tokyo, pp 91–103Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shimada Y, Kikushima D, Tagami J (2002) Micro-shear bond strength of resin-bonding systems to cervical enamel. Am J Dent 15:373–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Toledano M, Osório R, Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA (2001) Influence of self-etching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 14:205–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH (2000) Hybridization of dental hard tissues, Quintessence, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakabayashi N (1991) Dentinal bonding mechanisms. Quintessence Int 22:73–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kataumi M, Nakajima M, Yamada T, Tagami J (1998) Tensile bond strength and SEM evaluation of Er:YAG laser irradiated dentin using dentin adhesive. Dent Mat J 17:125–138Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Armengol V, Jean A, Weiss P, Hamel H (1999) Comparative in vitro study of the bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin obtained with laser irradiation or acid etch. Lasers Med Sci 14:207–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Martínez-Insua A, Dominguez LS, Rivera FG, Santana-Penin UA (2000) Differences on bonding to acid-etched or Er:YAG-laser-treated enamel and dentin surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 84:280–288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Eguro T, Maeda T, Otsuki M, Nishimura Y, Katsumi I, Tanaka H (2002) Adhesion of Er:YAG laser-irradiated dentin and composite resins: application of various treatments on irradiated surface. Lasers Surg Med 30:267–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Benazzato P, Stefani A (2003) The effect of Er:YAG laser treatment on dentin collagen: an SEM investigation. J Oral Laser Appl 3:79–81Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schein MT, Bocangel JS, Nogueira GEC, Schein PAL (2003) SEM evaluation of the interaction pattern between dentin and resin after cavity preparation using Er:YAG laser. J Dent 31:127–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Torii Y, Itou K, Nishitani Y, Ishikawa K, Suzuki K (2002) Effect of phosphoric acid etching prior to self-etching primer application on adhesion of resin composite to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 15:305–308PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hossain M, Nakamura Y, Kimura Y, Yamada Y, Ito M, Matsumoto K (2000) Caries-preventive effect of Er:YAG laser irradiation with or without water mist. J Clin Laser Med Sur 18:61–65Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, Tomé AR, Vanherle G, Lopes AB (1996) Morphological field emission–SEM study of the effect of six phosphoric acid etching agents on human dentin. Dent Mat 12:262–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M, Marshall GW (2001) Microleakage of composite restorations after acid or Er:YAG laser cavity treatments. Dent Mater 17:340–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rubens C. R. de Carvalho
    • 1
    • 4
  • Patricia M. de Freitas
    • 1
  • Masayuki Otsuki
    • 2
  • Carlos P. de Eduardo
    • 1
  • Junji Tagami
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry of São PauloUniversity of São Paulo (USP)Sao PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Cariology and Operative Dentistry, Graduate School of DentistryTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Restorative SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  4. 4.Departamento de Dentística—Faculdade de Odontologia de São PauloUSPSao PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations