Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 25–29 | Cite as

A comparative SEM study between hand instrument and Er:YAG laser scaling and root planing

  • A. Moghare Abed
  • M. Tawakkoli
  • M. A. Dehchenari
  • N. Gutknecht
  • M. MirEmail author
Original article

Abstract

Scaling and root planing are one of the most commonly used procedures for the treatment of periodontal diseases. Removal of calculus using conventional hand instruments is incomplete and rather time-consuming. In search for more efficient and less difficult instrumentation, investigators have proposed lasers as alternatives or adjuncts for scaling and root planing. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planing with erbium: yttrium, aluminium, garnet (Er:YAG) laser and hand instrumentation in vitro. The mesial and distal surfaces of 15 periodontal loosed extracted teeth were treated randomly either by hand instrumentation or by Er:YAG laser irradiation. After choosing the “very long pulse mode” (pulse duration of about 700 μs), the output energy of 160 mJ with 920-μm beam diameter (RO7 Perio tip, Fidelis, Fotona, Slovenia) and frequency of 12 Hz were selected, both according to the best results of past studies. In addition, air water spray was used during the procedures. The morphology of the root surface was evaluated by three observers with a scanning electron microscopy in magnifications of 50× and 400×. The result of this setting showed that the rate of remained roughness on treated root surfaces in two groups of hand instruments and Er:YAG laser had a meaningful difference: The surface roughness in Er:YAG laser group was more than in hand instruments group. The present study could demonstrate the in vitro capability of the Er:YAG laser for scaling and root planing in periodontitis, although the effectiveness of this setting did not reach that achieved by hand instrumentation. It could be concluded that lower frequency and long pulse duration maybe more suitable for the micro-morphology of root surface after treatment. This theory is going to be tested with the same laser instrument in the next study.

Keywords

Scaling and root planing Er:YAG laser Hand instrumentation 

References

  1. 1.
    American Academy of Periodontology (2001) Treatment of plaque-induced gingivitis, chronic periodontitis and other clinical conditions. J Periodontol 72:1790–1800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Badersten A, Nilveus R, Egelberg J (1984) Effect of non surgical periodontal therapy. II. Severely advanced periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 11:63–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carranza FA, Newman MG (2002) Clinical periodontology, 9th edn. WB, Sanders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garret JS (1977) Root planning a perspective. J Periodontol 48:553Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yukna RA, Scott JB, Aichelman ME (1997) Clinical evaluation of the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal on single rooted teeth with diamond-coated ultrasonic tips. J Periodontol 68:436–442PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morlock BJ, Killoy WJ (1992) The effect of Nd:YAG laser exposure on root surface when used an adjunct to root planning. J Periodontol 63:637–641PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Watanabe H, Ishikawa I (1996) Clinical assessment of the Er:YAG laser for soft tissue surgery and scaling. J Clin Laser Med Surg 14:67–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ishikawa I, Aoki A, Takasaki AA (2004) Potential applications of Er:YAG laser in periodontics. J Periodontal Res 39:275–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ebrhard J, Ehlers H (2003) Efficacy of subgingival calculus removal with Er:YAG laser compared to mechanical debridement. J Clin Periodontol 30:511–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aoki A, Ando Y, Watanabe H (1994) In vitro studies on laser scaling of subgingival calculus with an Er:YAG laser. J Periodontol 65:1097–1106PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ando Y, Aoki A, Watanabe H, Ishikawa I (1996) Bactericidal effect of erbium YAG laser on periodontopathic bacteria. Lasers Surg Med 19(2):190–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aoki A, Ishikawa I (1998) Comparison between Er:YAG laser and conventional technique for root caries treatment. J Dent Res 77:1404–1414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aoki A, Miura M, Akiyama F, Nakagawa N, Tanaka J, Oda S, Watanabe H, Ishikawa I (2000) In vitro evaluation of Er:YAG laser scaling of subgingival calculus in comparison with ultrasonic scaling. J Periodontal Res 35(5):266–277 (Oct)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sasaki KM, Aoki A, Ichinose S, Ishikawa I (2002) Morphological analysis of cementum and root dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Surg Med 31(2):79–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sasaki KM, Aoki A, Masuno H, Ichinose S, Yamada S, Ishikawa I (2002) Compositional analysis of root cementum and dentin after Er:YAG laser irradiation compared with CO2 lased and intact roots using Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy. J Periodontal Res 37(1):50–59 (Feb)PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwarz F, Aoki A, Sculean A, Georg T, Scherbaum W, Becker J (2003) In vivo effects of an Er:YAG laser, an ultrasonic system and scaling and root planing on the biocompatibility of periodontally diseased root surfaces in cultures of human PDL fibroblasts. Lasers Surg Med 33(2):140–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gaspirc B, Skaleric U (2001) Morphology, chemical structure and diffusion processes of root surface after Er:YAG and Nd:YAG laser irradiation. J Clin Periodontol 28:508–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Israel M, Cobb CM, Rossmann JA (1997) The effects of Co2, Nd:YAG and Er:YAG lasers with and without surface coolant on root surfaces. J Clin Periodontol 24:595–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Watanabe H, Ishikawa I, Suzuki M, Hasegawa K (1996) Clinical assessments of the erbium:YAG laser for soft tissue surgery and scaling. J Clin Laser Med Surg 14:67–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gutknecht N (1999) Lasertherapie in der zahnärztlichen Praxis. Quintessenz Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Apel C, Franzen R, Meister J, Sarrafzadegan H, Thelen S, Gutknecht N (2002) Influence of the pulse duration of an Er:YAG laser system on the ablation threshold of dental enamel. Lasers Med Sci 17(4):253–257PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meister J, Apel C, Franzen R, Gutknecht N (2003) Influence of the spatial beam profile on hard tissue ablation. Part I: Multimode emitting Er:YAG lasers. Lasers Med Sci 18(2):112–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yamaguchi H, Kobayashi K, Osado R (1997) Effect of irradiation of an Er:YAG laser on root surface. J Periodontol 68:1151–1155PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Schwarz F, Sculean A, George T (2001) Periodontal treatment with an Er:YAG laser compared to scaling and root planning. J Periodontol 72:361–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ishikawa I (2002) Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces. J Periodontol 73:361–367Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Feist IS, De Micheli G (2003) Adhesion and growth of cultured human gingival fibroblasts on periodontally involved root surfaces treated by Er:YAG laser. J Periodontol 74:1368–1375PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Folwaczny M, Thiele L, Meh A (2001) The effect of working tip angulation on root substance removal using Er:YAG laser radiation. J Clin Periodontol 28:220–226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwarz F, Putz N, George T (2001) Effect of an Er:YAG laser on periodontally involved root surfaces: an in vivo and in vitro SEM comparison. Lasers Surg Med 29:328–335PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Moghare Abed
    • 1
  • M. Tawakkoli
    • 1
  • M. A. Dehchenari
    • 1
  • N. Gutknecht
    • 2
  • M. Mir
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Dental School, Isfahan Medical UniversityIsfahanIran
  2. 2.Aachen Dental Laser Research Centre, RWTH HospitalAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations