Advertisement

Lasers in Medical Science

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 219–222 | Cite as

Optimizing treatment parameters for hair removal using long-pulsed Nd:YAG-lasers

  • K. RaffEmail author
  • M. Landthaler
  • U. Hohenleutner
Original Article

Abstract

Our aim was to determine the most effective treatment parameters for laser-assisted hair removal using long-pulsed Nd:YAG-lasers. 42 volunteers were treated with 1064 nm long-pulsed Nd:YAG-lasers. We used two different laser systems (Lyra XP, Wavelight and Smartepil II Deka-LMS) with various pulse lengths, fluences, and spot sizes. For each parameter, five test areas were treated one to five times at 4-week intervals. Follow-ups were performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the last treatment. Percentual hair loss, side effects, and pain during treatment were evaluated. The average hair reduction 12 months after the last treatment using the Lyra XP was 48%, using the Smartepil II it ranged between 30% and 35%. There were no permanent side effects. Long-pulsed 1064 nm Nd:YAG-lasers are safe and effective for hair reduction. Although the different treatment parameters did not lead to a lot of differing hair reduction 12 months after the last treatment, the laser with the largest spot size and the longest pulse time showed the best results.

Keywords

Epilation Long-pulsed Nd:YAG-laser 

References

  1. 1.
    Chan HH, Ying S-Y, Ho W-S, Wong DSY, Lam L-K (2001) An in vivo study comparing the efficacy and complications of diode laser and long pulsed Nd:YAG laser in hair removal in Chinese patients. Dermatol Surg 27(11):950–954CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bencini PL, Luci A, Galimberti M, Ferranti G (1999) Long-term epilation with long-pulsed Neodimium:YAG laser. Dermatol Surg 25(3)175–178Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Landthaler M, Haina D, Brunner R, Waidelich W, Braun-Falco O (1986) Effects of argon, dye and Nd:YAG lasers on epidermis, dermis and venous vessels. Lasers Surg Med 6:87–93PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Raulin C, Greve B (2000) Aktueller Stand der Photoepilation. Hautarzt 51:809–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U (1999) Laserlicht-Gewebe-Interaktionen. In: Landthaler M (ed). Lasertherapie in der Dermatologie. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bäumler W, Scherer K, Abels C, Neff S, Landthaler M, Szeimies RM (2002) The effect of different spot sizes on the efficacy of hair removal using a long-pulsed diode laser. Dermatol Surg 28(2):118–121CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rogachefsky AS, Becker K, Weiss G, Goldberg DJ (2002) Evaluation of a long-pulsed Nd:YAG laser at different parameters: an analysis of both fluence and pulse duration. Dermatol Surg 28:932–936CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Altshuler GB, Anderson RR, Manstein D, Zenzie HH, Smirnov MZ (2001) Extended theory of selective photothermolysis. Lasers Surg Med 29:416–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorenz S, Brunnberg S, Landthaler M, Hohenleutner U (2002) Hair removal with the long pulsed Nd:YAG laser: a prospective study with one year follow up. Lasers Surg Med 30:127–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goldberg DJ, Silapunt S (2001) Hair removal using a long pulsed Nd:YAG laser: comparison at fluences of 50, 80 an 100 J/cm2. Dermatol Surg 27:434–436CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DermatologyUniversity of RegensburgRegensburgGermany

Personalised recommendations