Economics of Governance

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 101–134 | Cite as

Does government ideology influence budget composition? Empirical evidence from OECD countries

  • Niklas Potrafke
Original Paper


This paper examines whether government ideology has influenced the allocation of public expenditures in OECD countries. I analyze two datasets that report different expenditure categories and cover the time periods 1970–1997 and 1990–2006, respectively. The results suggest that government ideology has had a rather weak influence on the composition of governments’ budgets. Leftist governments, however, increased spending on “Public Services” in the period 1970–1997 and on “Education” in the period 1990–2006. These findings imply, first, that government ideology hardly influenced budgetary affairs in the last decades, and thus, if ideology plays a role at all, it influences non-budgetary affairs. Second, education has become an important expenditure category for leftist parties to signal their political visions to voters belonging to all societal groups.


Budget composition Public expenditures Government ideology Partisan politics Education policy Panel data 

JEL Classification

D72 H50 H61 I28 C23 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Alesina A (1987) Macroeconomic policy in a two-party system as a repeated game. Q J Econ 102: 651–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina A, Roubini N, Cohen GD (1997) Political cycles and the macroeconomy. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Alt JE, Lassen DD (2006) Fiscal transparency, political parties, and debt in OECD countries. Eur Econ Rev 50: 1403–1439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angelopoulos K, Economides G (2008) Fiscal policy, rent seeking, and growth under electoral uncertainty: theory and evidence from the OECD. Can J Econ 41: 1375–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ansell BW (2008) University challenges explaining institutional change in higher education. World Polit 60: 189–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck N, Katz JN (1996) Nuisance vs. substance: specifying and estimating time-series cross section models. Polit Anal 6: 1–36Google Scholar
  8. Behr A (2003) A comparison of dynamic panel data estimators: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to the investment function. Discussion paper 05/03, Economic Research Center of the Deutsche BundesbankGoogle Scholar
  9. Bel G, Elias-Moreno F (2009) Institutional determinants of military spending. Working Paper 2009/22, Research Institute of Applied Economics, BarcelonaGoogle Scholar
  10. Bercoff JJ, Meloni O (2009) Federal budget allocation in an emergent democracy: evidence from Argentina. Econ Gov 10: 65–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Betts JR, Morrell D (1999) The determinants of undergraduate grade point average: The relative importance of family background, high school resources, and peer group effects. J Hum Resour 34: 268–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bierbrauer F (2009) Optimal income taxation and public good provision with endogenous interest groups. J Public Econ Theory 11: 311–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bjørnskov C (2005) Does political ideology affect economic growth?. Public Choice 123: 133–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bjørnskov C (2008a) The growth-inequality association: government ideology matters. J Dev Econ 87: 300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bjørnskov C (2008b) Political ideology and the structure of national accounts in the Nordic countries, 1950–2004. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the European Public Choice Society, Jena 27–30, March 2008Google Scholar
  16. Bjørnskov C, Potrafke N (2011a) Politics and privatization in Central and Eastern Europe: a panel data analysis. Econ Transit (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  17. Bjørnskov C, Potrafke N (2011b) Political ideology and economic freedom across Canadian provinces. East Econ J (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  18. Bloom D, Canning D, Mansfield RK, Moore M (2007) Demographic change, social security systems, and savings. J Monet Econ 54: 92–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Blundell RW, Bond SR (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic Panel data models. J Econ 87: 115–143Google Scholar
  20. Boix C (1997) Political parties and the supply side of the economy: the provision of Physical and human capital in advanced economies, 1960–1990. Am J Polit Sci 41: 814–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Boix C (1998) Political parties, growth and equality—conservative and social democratic economic strategies in the world economy. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  22. Bräuninger T (2005) A partisan model of government expenditure. Public Choice 125: 409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Bruno GSF (2005a) Approximating the bias of the LSDV estimator for dynamic unbalanced panel data models. Econ Lett 87: 361–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bruno GSF (2005b) Estimation and inference in dynamic unbalanced panel data models with a small number of individuals. Stata J 5: 473–500Google Scholar
  25. Budge I, Keman H, Woldendorp J (1993) Political data 1945–1990. Party government in 20 democracies. Eur J Polit Res 24: 1–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Busemeyer MR (2007) Determinants of public education spending in 21 OECD democracies, 1980–2001. J Eur Public Policy 14: 582–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Busemeyer MR (2009a) Social democrats and the new partisan politics of public investment in education. J Eur Public Policy 16: 107–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Busemeyer MR (2009b) From myth to reality: globalization and public spending in OECD countries revisited. Eur J Polit Res 48: 455–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Calcagno PT, Escaleras M (2007) Party alternation, divided government, and fiscal performance within US states. Econ Gov 8: 111–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Congleton RD, Bose F (2010) The rise of the modern welfare state, ideology, institutions and income security: analysis and evidence. Public Choice 144: 535–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Correa H, Kim J-W (1992) A causal analysis of defence expenditures of the USA and the USSR. J Peace Res 29: 161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Cremer H, De Donder P, Gahvari F (2008) Political competition within and between parties: an application to environmental policy. J Public Econ 92: 532–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. De Donder P, Hindriks J (2007) Equilibrium social insurance with policy-motivated parties. Eur J Polit Econ 23: 624–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Drazen A, Eslava M (2010) Electoral manipulation via voter-friendly spending: Theory and evidence. J Dev Econ 92: 39–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dreher A (2006) Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization. Appl Econ 38: 1091–1110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Dreher A, Sturm J-E, Ursprung HW (2008) The impact of globalization on the composition of government expenditures: Evidence from panel data. Public Choice 134: 263–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Dreher A, Gaston N, Martens P (2008) Measuring globalization—gauging its consequences. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  38. Gemmell N, Kneller R, Sanz I (2008) Foreign investment, international trade and the size and structure of public expenditures. Eur J Polit Econ 24: 151–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Heckelman JC (2002) Variable rational partisan business cycles: theory and some evidence. Can J Econ 35: 568–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Henisz W (2000) The institutional environment for growth. Econ Polit 12: 1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hibbs DA Jr (1977) Political parties and macroeconomic policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 71: 1467–1487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hicks AM, Swank D (1992) Politics, institutions and welfare spending in industrialized democracies, 1960-82. Am Polit Sci Rev 86: 658–674CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Huber E, Stephens JD (2001) Development and crisis of the welfare state. Parties and policies in global markets. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Immergut EM (1992) Health politics—interests and institutions in Western Europe. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Iversen T, Stephens JD (2008) Partisan politics, the welfare state, and three worlds of human capital formation. Comp Polit Stud 41: 600–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Jensen C (2010) Issue compensation and right-wing social spending. Eur J Polit Res 49: 282–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jensen C (2011a) Marketization via compensation: Health care and the politics of the right in advanced industrialized nations. Br J Polit Sci (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  48. Jensen C (2011b) Determinants of welfare service provision after the Golden Age. Int J Soc Welf (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  49. Jensen C (2011c) Capitalist systems, de-industrialization, and the politics of public education. Comp Polit Stud (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  50. Johansen K, Mydland Ø, Strøm B (2007) Politics in wage setting: does government colour matter?. Econ Gov 8: 95–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Katsimi M, Sarantides V (2010) Do elections affect the composition of fiscal policy? CESifo working paper series no. 2908Google Scholar
  52. Kittel B, Obinger H (2003) Politicial parties, institutions, and the dynamics of social expenditure in times of austerity. J Eur Public Policy 10: 20–45Google Scholar
  53. Kneebone RD, McKenzie KJ (2001) Electoral and partisan cycles in fiscal policy: An examination of Canadian provinces. Int Tax Public Finance 8: 753–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Lago-Peñas I, Lago-Peñas S (2009) Does the nationalization of party systems affect the composition of public spending?. Econ Gov 10: 85–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lange P, Garrett G (1985) The politics of growth: strategic interaction and economic performance in advanced industrialized democracies, 1974–1980. J Polit 47: 792–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Laurency P, Schindler D (2010) Why green parties should fear successful international climate agreements. Discussion paper no. 56, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut KreuzlingenGoogle Scholar
  57. Merzyn W, Ursprung HW (2005) Voter support for privatizing education: evidence, self-interest and ideology. Eur J Polit Econ 25: 33–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Newey WK, West KD (1987) A simple, positive semi-definite, heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation consistent covariance matrix. Econometrica 55: 703–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nincic M, Cusack TR (1979) The political economy of US military spending. J Peace Res 16: 101–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nordhaus WD (1975) The political business cycle. Rev Econ Stud 42: 169–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Oberndorfer U, Steiner V (2007) Generationen- oder Parteienkonflikt? Eine empirische Analyse der deutschen Hochschulausgaben. Perspekt Wirtsch 8: 165–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. OECD (2007) Health Data Base, ParisGoogle Scholar
  63. OECD (2008a) Main Economic Indicators, ParisGoogle Scholar
  64. OECD (2008b) Economic Outlook, ParisGoogle Scholar
  65. Ono T (2009) The political economy of environmental and social security policies: The role of environmental lobbying. Econ Gov 10: 261–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pierson P (1996) The new politics of the welfare state. World Polit 48: 143–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pierson P (2001) Post-industrial pressures on the mature welfare states. In: Pierson P (ed) The new politics of the welfare state. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 80–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Potrafke N (2009a) Did globalization restrict partisan politics? An empirical evaluation of social expenditures in a panel of OECD countries. Public Choice 140: 105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Potrafke N (2009b) Does government ideology influence political alignment with the U.S.? An empirical analysis of voting in the UN General Assembly. Rev Int Organ 4: 245–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Potrafke N (2010a) The growth of public health expenditures in OECD countries: Do government ideology and electoral motives matter?. J Health Econ 29: 797–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Potrafke N (2010) Does government ideology influence deregulation of product markets? Empirical evidence from OECD countries. Public Choice 143: 135–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Potrafke N (2010c) Ideology and cultural policy. Discussion paper no. 49, Thurgauer Wirtschaftsinstitut KreuzlingenGoogle Scholar
  73. Potrafke N (2011a) Public expenditures on education and cultural affairs in the West German states: Does government ideology influence the budget composition?. Ger Econ Rev 12: 124–145Google Scholar
  74. Potrafke N (2011b) Political cycles and economic performance in OECD countries: empirical evidence from 1951–2006. Public Choice (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  75. Rogoff K, Sibert A (1988) Elections and macroeconomic policy cycles. Rev Econ Stud 55: 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Roodman D (2009) A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 71: 135–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Roodman D (2006) How to do xtabond2: an introduction to “Difference” and “System” GMM in Stata. Working paper 103, Center for Global DevelopmentGoogle Scholar
  78. Rose R (1990) Inheritance before choice in public policy. J Theor Polit 2: 263–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Sakamoto T (2008) Economic policy and performance in industrial democracies – party governments, central banks and the fiscal-monetary policy mix. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  80. Sanz I, Velázquez F (2007) The role of aging in the growth of government and social welfare spending in the OECD. Eur J Polit Econ 23: 917–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schmidt MG (2007) Testing the retrenchment hypothesis: education spending, 1960–2002. In: Castles FG (ed) The disappearing state? Retrenchment realities in an age of globalization. Edward Elgar, Celtenham, pp 159–183Google Scholar
  82. Schneider C, Urpelainen J (2010) Partisan waves in international cooperation. Working paper, University of California, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  83. Schulze GG, Rose A (1998) Public orchestra funding in Germany—an empirical investigation. J Cult Econ 22: 227–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Schulze GG, Ursprung HW (1999) Globalization of the economy and the nation state. World Econ 22: 295–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Schulze GG, Ursprung HW (2000) La donna e mobile—or is she? Voter preferences and public support for the performing arts. Public Choice 102: 131–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Shelton CA (2007) The size and composition of government expenditure. J Public Econ 91: 2230–2260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Shi M, Svensson J (2006) Political budget cycles: do they differ across countries and why?. J Public Econ 90: 1367–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Stock JH, Watson MW (2008) Heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors for fixed-effects panel-data regression. Econometrica 76: 155–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Sylwester K (2002) Can education expenditures reduce income inequality?. Econ Educ Rev 21: 43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Tavares J (2004) Does right or left matter? Cabinets, credibility and fiscal adjustment. J Public Econ 88: 2447–2468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Tepe M, Vanhuysse P (2009a) Educational business cycles—the political economy of teacher hiring across German states, 1992–2004. Public Choice 139: 61–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Tepe M, Vanhuysse P (2009b) Are aging OECD welfare states on the path to gerontocracy? Evidence from 18 democracies, 1980–2002. J Public Policy 29: 1–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Tepe M, Vanhuysse P (2010) Who cuts back and when? The politics of delays in social expenditure cutbacks, 1980–2005. West Eur Polit 33: 1214–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Tridimas G (2001) The economics and politics of the structure of public expenditure. Public Choice 106: 299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Tsakloglou P, Antoninis M (1999) On the distributional impact of public education: evidence from Greece. Econ Educ Rev 18: 439–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Ursprung HW (2008) Globalization and the welfare state. In: Durlauf SN, Blume L (eds) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. 2nd edn. Palgrave Macmillan, KölnGoogle Scholar
  97. Vergne C (2009) Democracy, elections and allocation of public expenditures in developing countries. Eur J Polit Econ 25: 63–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Woldendorp J, Keman H, Budge I (1998) Party government in 20 democracies: an update 1990–1995. Eur J Polit Res 33: 125–164Google Scholar
  99. Woldendorp J, Keman H, Budge I (2000) Party government in 48 democracies 1945–1998: composition, duration, personnel. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  100. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  101. World Bank (2007) World development indicators. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  102. World Bank (2008) World development indicators. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations