Economics of Governance

, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp 27–49 | Cite as

Corruption in dictatorships

  • William HallaganEmail author
Original Paper


In this paper, we consider a simple model capable of explaining why some dictatorships choose to extract rents via seemingly inefficient institutions. In particular, this paper focuses on institutions associated with high levels of corruption and examines the conditions under which such institutions could serve the interests of a dictatorship. Developing such a model requires that we pose alternative institutions that dictators can choose to extract rents. Using this framework, this paper builds a model providing a theoretical basis for some stylized facts about the observed crosscountry variation in corruption levels. Specifically, the model motivates a rationale for the finding that higher levels of corruption are observed in countries characterized as having more heterogeneous populations, longer expected dictator tenure, and more severe punishment norms. The model is then estimated using international country level data.


Institutional choice Economic development Public choice 

JEL Classification

D72 D73 H11 K42 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ades A, Di Tella R (1999) Rents, competition, and corruption. Am Econ Rev 89(4): 982–993CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck T, Clarke G, Groff A, Keefer P, Walsh P (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Econ Rev 15(1): 165–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergsten CF, Freeman C, Lardy N, Mitchell D (2008) China’s rise. Peterson Institute for International Economics, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Besley T, McLaren J (1993) Taxes and bribery: the role of wage incentives. Econ J 103(416): 119–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Djankov S, McLeish C, Nenova T, Shleifer A (2001) Who owns the media? World bank policy research working paper 2620. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. Fairbank JK (1964) Trade and diplomacy on the China coast. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  7. Fredriksson P, Svesson J (2003) Political instability, corruption and policy formation: the case of environmental policy. J Public Econ 87: 1383–1405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisman R, Gatti R (2002) Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. J Public Econ 83(3): 325–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gupta S, Davoodi H, Alonso-Terme R (2002) Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?. Econ Gov 3(1): 23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kaufman D, Kraay A, Mastruzzi M (2003) Governance matters III: governance indicators for 1996-2002. Policy Research Paper 3106. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  11. Krain M (1997) State sponsored mass murder. J Confl Resolut 41(3): 331–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Knack S, Azfar O (2000) Are larger countries really more corrupt? Sample selection, country size and the quality of governance. Policy Research Working Paper 2470. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  13. Lambsdorff JG (2002) Making corrupt deals: contracting in the shadow of the law. J Econ Behav Organ 48(3): 221–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lambsdorff JG (2003) How corruption affects persistent capital flows. Econ Gov 4(3): 229–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. LaPorta R, Lopez-de-Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1998) J Polit Economy 106(6): 1113–1155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lederman D, Loayza N, Soares R (2001) Accountability and corruption: political institutions matter. The World Bank, WashingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Linz J, Stephan A (1996) Toward consolidated democracies. J Democr 7(2): 14–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mathewson F, Winter R (1985) The economics of franchise contracts. J Law Econ 28(3): 503–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mauro Paolo (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110(3): 681–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pellegrini L, Gerlagh R (2008) Causes of corruption: a survey of cross-country analyses and extended results 9(4):245–263Google Scholar
  21. Persson T, Roland G, Tabelinni G (1997) Separation of powers and political accountability. Q J Econ 112(4): 1163–1202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rauch J, Evans P (2000) Bureaucratic structure and bureaucratic performance in less developed countries. J Public Econ 75(1): 49–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Svensson J (2000) Foreign aid and rent-seeking. J Int Econ 51(2): 437–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross national study. J Public Econ 76(3): 399–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Van Rijckeghem C, Weder B (2001) Bureaucratic corruption and the rate of temptation: do wages in the civil service affect corruption, and by how much?. J Dev Econ 65(2): 307–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wei SJ (2000) How taxing is corruption on international investors?. Rev Econ Stat 82: 1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wintrobe R (1998) The political economy of dictatorships. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  28. Wintrobe R (2001) How to understand, and deal with dictatorship: an economist’s view. Econ Gov 2: 35–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wright S (1936) The origins and development of the Chinese customs service. Manuscript for private circulation only, ShanghaiGoogle Scholar
  30. Wright S (1950) Hart and the Chinese customs. The Queen’s University Press, BelfastGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economic SciencesWashington State UniversityPullmanUSA

Personalised recommendations