Efficiency analysis of European Freight Villages: three peers for benchmarking

Original Paper
  • 315 Downloads

Abstract

Measuring the efficiency of Freight Villages (FVs) has important implications for logistics companies and other related companies as well as governments. In this paper we apply data envelopment analysis (DEA) to measure the efficiency of European FVs in a purely data-driven way, incorporating the nature of FVs as complex operations that use multiple inputs and produce several outputs. We employ several DEA models and perform a complete sensitivity analysis of the appropriateness of the chosen input and output variables, and an assessment of the robustness of the efficiency score. It turns out that about half of the 20 FVs analyzed are inefficient, with utilization of the intermodal area, warehouse capacity and level of goods handling being the most important areas of improvement. While we find no significant differences in efficiency between FVs of different sizes and in different countries, it turns out that the FVs Eurocentre Toulouse, Interporto Quadrante Europa and GVZ Nürnberg constitute more than 90 % of the benchmark share.

Keywords

Freight Village Benchmarking Efficiency measurement Data envelopment analysis (DEA) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Claudio di Ciccio for the questionnaire translation and all of the participants who kindly provided useful information for our survey. The authors are grateful to two anonymous referees for their very constructive suggestions for improving the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

We express our appreciation for the State Scholarship Fund of China Scholarship Council (Grant No. 2011613013). We herewith state that there are no potential conflicts of interest (financial or non-financial) and that the submission complies with the Ethical Rules of the Central European Journal of Operations Research (CJOR).

References

  1. Amirteimoori A (2011) An extended transportation problem: a DEA-based approach. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19(4):513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrejić M, Bojović N, Kilibarda M (2013) Benchmarking distribution centres using principal component analysis and data envelopment analysis: a case study of serbia. Expert Syst Appl 40(10):3926–3933CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adler N, Liebert V, Yazhemsky E (2013) Benchmarking airports from a managerial perspective. Omega 41(2):442–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ballis A (2006) Freight villages: warehouse design and rail link aspects. Transp Res Rec 1966(1):27–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ballis A, Golias J (2002) Comparative evaluation of existing and innovative rail-road freight transport terminals. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 36(7):593–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banaszewska A, Cruijssen F, Dullaert W, Gerdessen JC (2012) A framework for measuring efficiency levels—the case of express depots. Int J Prod Econ 139(2):484–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW (1984) Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag Sci 30(9):1078–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Banker RD, Thrall RM (1992) Estimation of returns to scale using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 62(1):74–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhanot N, Singh H (2014) Benchmarking the performance indicators of Indian Railway container business using data envelopment analysis. Benchmark Int J 21(1):101–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cezar-Gabriel C (2010) Performance assessment in operating dry ports. Ann Faculty Econ 1(2):934–938Google Scholar
  11. Chakraborty PS, Majumder G, Sarkar B (2011) Performance measurement of distribution center combining data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Adv Ind Eng Manag 6(2):117–128Google Scholar
  12. Charles V, Kumar M, Irene Kavitha S (2012) Measuring the efficiency of assembled printed circuit boards with undesirable outputs using data envelopment analysis. Int J Prod Econ 136(1):194–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2(6):429–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen G, Qian Z (2010) MaxDEA LP manual. http://www.maxdea.cn/. Accessed 14 June 2014
  15. Coelli TJ, Rao DSP, O’Donnell CJ, Battese GE (2005) An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Tone K (2007) Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-solver software. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2011) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. Springer Science and Business Media, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cook WD, Tone K, Zhu J (2014) Data envelopment analysis: prior to choosing a model. Omega 44:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cullinane K, Wang TF, Song DW, Ji P (2006) The technical efficiency of container ports: comparing data envelopment analysis and stochastic frontier analysis. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 40(4):354–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Carvalho CC, Lima Jr OF (2010) Efficient logistic platform design: the case of Campinas Platform. http://www.abepro.org.br/biblioteca/enegep2010_TI_ST_113_741_17234.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2013
  21. De Witte K, Marques RC (2010) Designing performance incentives, an international benchmark study in the water sector. Cent Eur J Oper Res 18(2):189–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Europlatforms EEIG (2004) Logistics centres directions for use, Europlatforms EEIG. http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/eatl/docs/EN-REV-WhatisaFreightVillageFinalcorretto.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2012
  24. Farrell MJ et al (1957) The measurement of productive efficiency. J R Stat Soc Ser A (General) 3(120):253–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. George SA, Rangaraj N (2008) A performance benchmarking study of Indian railway zones. Benchmark Int J 15(5):599–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Golany B, Roll Y (1989) An application procedure for DEA. Omega 17(3):237–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grewal D, Levy M, Mehrotra A, Sharma A (1999) Planning merchandising decisions to account for regional and product assortment differences. J Retail 75(3):405–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamdan A, Rogers KJ (2008) Evaluating the efficiency of 3PL logistics operations. Int J Prod Econ 113(1):235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Haralambides H, Gujar G (2012) On balancing supply chain efficiency and environmental impacts: an eco-DEA model applied to the dry port sector of India. Marit Econ Logis 14(1):122–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ho CT, Zhu DS (2004) Performance measurement of Taiwan’s commercial banks. Int J Prod Perform Manag 53(5):425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hung SW, Lu WM (2008) The comparative productivity efficiency of Taiwan’s integrated circuits packaging/testing firms. INFOR Inf Syst Oper Res 46(3):189–198Google Scholar
  32. Jacobs R, Smith PC, Street A (2006) Measuring efficiency in health care: analytic techniques and health policy. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jha DK, Shrestha R (2006) Measuring efficiency of hydropower plants in Nepal using data envelopment analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(4):1502–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kapros S, Panou K, Tsamboulas D (2005) Multi-criteria approach to the evaluation of intermodal freight villages. Transp Res Rec 1906(1):56–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koch H, Münch S, Nestler S, Nobel N (2010) Ranking of the European Freight Village locations—benchmarking of the European experience. wvb Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  36. Kritikos M, Markellos RN, Prastacos G (2010) Corporate real estate analysis: evaluating telecom branch efficiency in Greece. Appl Econ 42(9):1133–1143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kumar S, Gulati R (2008) Evaluation of technical efficiency and ranking of public sector banks in India: an analysis from cross-sectional perspective. Int J Prod Perform Manag 57(7):540–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kumar Singh S, Kumar Bajpai V (2013) Estimation of operational efficiency and its determinants using DEA: the case of Indian coal-fired power plants. Int J Energy Sect 7(4):409–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lau KH (2012) Distribution network rationalization through benchmarking with DEA. Benchmark Int J 19(6):668–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 113(2):1025–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lin LC, Hong CH (2006) Operational performance evaluation of international major airports: an application of data envelopment analysis. J Air Transp Manag 12(6):342–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liu CC (2008) Evaluating the operational efficiency of major ports in the Asia-Pacific region using data envelopment analysis. Appl Econ 40(13):1737–1743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu JH, Dong JQ, Chang Q (2013) Assessing logistics park operational efficiency using dual variables DEA model. Stat Decis 8:60–62Google Scholar
  44. Liu J, Zhou Y, Wei X (2010) International studies on logistics parks from 1999 to 2009: a literature review. Logist Technol 29(8):43–45Google Scholar
  45. Luo J (2013) Analysis on the operation effects of logistics park based on BP neural network. In: Proceedings of the 19th international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management, pp 1073–1079Google Scholar
  46. Malekmohammadi N, Lotfi FH, Jaafar AB (2011) Data envelopment scenario analysis with imprecise data. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19(1):65–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Manfred G, Martin P, Thouraya B (2008) Assessing performance indicators for inland terminals. http://simcont.net/fileadmin/simcont/downloads/Pub_PI.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2010
  48. Markovits-Somogyi R, Gecse G, Bokor Z (2011) Basic efficiency measurement of Hungarian logistics centres using data envelopment analysis. Period Polytech Soc Manag Sci 19(2):97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Meidute I (2005) Comparative analysis of the definitions of logistics centres. Transport 20(3):106–110Google Scholar
  50. Merkert R, Mangia L (2014) Efficiency of Italian and Norwegian airports: a matter of management or of the level of competition in remote regions? Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 62:30–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mostafa M (2007) Benchmarking top Arab banks’ efficiency through efficient frontier analysis. Ind Manage Data Syst 107(6):802–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nataraja NR, Johnson AL (2011) Guidelines for using variable selection techniques in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 215(3):662–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nyhan RC, Martin LL (1999) Comparative performance measurement: a primer on data envelopment analysis. Public Perform Manag Rev 22(3):348–364Google Scholar
  54. Ondrich J, Ruggiero J (2002) Outlier detection in data envelopment analysis: an analysis of jackknifing. J Oper Res Soc 53(3):342–346Google Scholar
  55. Pahwa A, Feng X, Lubkeman D (2003) Performance evaluation of electric distribution utilities based on data envelopment analysis. Power Syst IEEE Trans 18(1):400–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peng Wong W, Yew Wong K (2007) Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modelling. Ind Manage Data Syst 107(3):361–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Podinovski VV, Thanassoulis E (2007) Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: some practical suggestions. J Prod Anal 28(1–2):117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ramanathan R (2003) An introduction to data envelopment analysis: a tool for performance measurement. Sage Publ, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  59. Ross AD, Droge C (2004) An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems. J Oper Manag 21(6):673–688CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sarkis J, Talluri S (2004) Performance based clustering for benchmarking of US airports. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 38(5):329–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Smith P, Mayston D (1987) Measuring efficiency in the public sector. Omega 15(3):181–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sufian F (2007) Trends in the efficiency of Singapore’s commercial banking groups: a non-stochastic frontier DEA window analysis approach. Int J Prod perform Manag 56(2):99–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tongzon J (2001) Efficiency measurement of selected Australian and other international ports using data envelopment analysis. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 35(2):107–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vrochidis B (2013) Logistics centres as economic drivers of their regions. Department of Erasmus School of Economics: Erasmus University of Rotterdam, Rotterdam. http://thesis.eur.nl/pub/14748
  65. Wang DZ, Chen JJ (2009) Analysis on logistics park performance appraisal based on fuzzy synthetic evaluation method. Logist Sci Tech 10(32):79–82Google Scholar
  66. Winkler H, Seebacher G (2011) Management of freight villages: findings from an exploratory study in Germany. Int J Logist Res App 14(4):271–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wu J, Haasis HD (2013) Converting knowledge into sustainability performance of freight villages. Logist Res 6(2–3):63–88CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Yadav VK, Padhy NP, Gupta HO (2010) A micro level study of an Indian electric utility for efficiency enhancement. Energy 35(10):4053–4063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yadav VK, Padhy NP, Gupta HO (2011) Performance evaluation and improvement directions for an Indian electric utility. Energy Policy 39(11):7112–7120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yu MM, Chen PC (2011) Measuring air routes performance using a fractional network data envelopment analysis model. Cent Eur J Oper Res 19(1):81–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhou G, Min H, Xu C, Cao Z (2008) Evaluating the comparative efficiency of Chinese third-party logistics providers using data envelopment analysis. Int J Phys Distrib Log 38(4):262–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhu J (2000) Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. Eur J Oper Res 123(1):105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhu J, Shen ZH (1995) A discussion of testing DMUs’ returns to scale. Eur J Oper Res 81(3):590–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Production ManagementVienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  2. 2.Computational Science CenterUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations