Route stability in vehicle routing decisions: a bi-objective approach using metaheuristics

  • Kenneth Sörensen

Abstract

In this paper, we argue that vehicle routing solutions are often tactical decisions, that should not be changed too often or too much. For marketing or other reasons, vehicle routing solutions should be stable, i.e. a new solution (when e.g. new customers require service) should be as similar as possible to a solution already in use. Simultaneously however, this new solution should still have a good quality in the traditional sense (e.g. small total travel cost). In this paper, we develop a way to measure the difference between two vehicle routing solutions. We use this distance measure to create a metaheuristic approach that will find solutions that are “close” (in the solution space) to a given baseline solution and at the same time have a high quality in the sense that their total distance traveled is small. By using this approach, the dispatcher is offered a choice of Pareto-optimal solutions, allowing him to make a trade-off between changing his existing solution and allowing a longer travel distance. Some experiments are performed to show the effectiveness of the approach.

Key words

Vehicle routing Route stability Bi-objective optimization Distance measure 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    J. Berger and M. Barkaoui. A new hybrid genetic algorithm for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54:1254-â1262, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    D. J. Bertsimas and D. Simchi-Levi. A new generation of vehicle routing research: robust algorithms, addressing uncertainty. Operations Research, 44:286–304, 1996.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    D. J. Bertsimas. A vehicle routing problem with stochastic demand. Operations Research, 40:574–585, 1992.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    D.J. Bertsimas, P. Jaillet, and A. R. Odoni. A priori optimization. Operations Research, 38:1019–1033, 1990.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    N. Christofides, A. Mingozzi, and P. Toth. The vehicle routing problem. In N. Christofides, A. Mingozzi, P. Toth, and C. Sandi, editors, Combinatorial optimization, pages 315–338, Chichester, 1979. John Wiley.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Clark and J.W. Wright. Scheduling of vehicles from a central depot to a number of delivery points. Operations Research, 12:568–581, 1964.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.-F. Cordeau, M. Gendreau, A. Hertz, G. Laporte, and J.-S. Sormany. New heuristics for the vehicle routing problem. In A. Langevin and D. Riopel, editors, Logistics Systems: Design and Optimization, pages 270–297. Springer, 2005.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    M. Dell'Amico and P. Toth. Algorithms and codes for dense assignment problems: the state of the art. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 100:17–48, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    M.L. Fisher. Optimal solution of vehicle routing problems using minimum k-trees. Operations Research, 42:626–642, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    M. Gendreau, A. Hertz, and G. Laporte. A tabu search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem. Management Science, 40:1276–1290, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    P. Jaillet. A priori solution of a traveling salesman problem in which a random subset of customers is visited. Operations Research, 36:929–936, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    R. Jonker and A. Volgenant. A shortest augmenting path algorithm for dense and sparse linear assignment problems. Computing, 38:325–340, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J.K. Lenstra and A.H. Rinnooy Kan. Complexity of vehicle routing and scheduling problems. Networks, 11:221–228, 1981.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    V.I. Levenshtein. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics-Doklady, 10:707–710, 1966.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    J. Lysgaard, A.N. Letchford, and R.W. Eglese. A new branch-and-cut algorithm for the capacitated vehicle routing problem. Mathematical Programming, 100(2):423–445, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    C. Prins. A simple and effective evolutionary algorithm for the vehicle routing problem. Computers and Operations Research, 31(12):1885–2002, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    T.K. Ralphs. Parallel branch and cut for capacitated vehicle routing. Parallel Computing, 29:607–629, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    C. Rego and C. Roucairol. A parallel tabu search algorithm using ejection chains for the vehicle routing problem. In I.H. Osman and J.P. Kelly, editors, Meta-Heuristics: Theory and Applications, pages 661–675, Kluwer, Boston, 1996.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Reimann, K. Doerner, and R.F. Hartl. D-ants: Savings based ants divide and conquer the vehicle routing problem. Computers & Operations Research, 31:563–591, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    R. Ribeiro and H.R. Lorenço. A multi-objective model for a multiperiod distribution management problem. In J. Pinho de Sausa, editor, Book of Extended Abstracs of the Fifth Metaheuristics International Conference (MIC'2001), pages 97–102, Porto, 2001.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    K. Sörensen. A framework for robust and flexible optimisation using metaheuristics with applications in supply chain design. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp, 2003.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    K. Sörensen and M. Sevaux. GA/PM: Genetic algorithms with population management for permutation problems. In Proceedings of MIC 2003, pages 38(1)–38(6), Kyoto, Japan, 2003.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    K. Sörensen and M. Sevaux. MA/PM: Memetic algorithms with population management. Computers and Operations Research, 33:1214–1225, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    É.D. Taillard. Parallel iterative search methods for vehicle routing problems. Networks, 23:661–673, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    S.R. Thangiah, B. Wilson, A. Pitluga, and W. Mennell. School bus routing in rural school districts. In 9th International Conference on Computer-Aided Scheduling of Public Transport (CASPT), San Diego, California, 2004.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    P. Toth and D. Vigo. The granular tabu search and its application to the vehicle routing problem. INFORMS Journal on Computing, 15: 333-â346, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    P. Toth and D. Vigo. Exact algorithms for vehicle routing. In T.G. Crainic and G. Laporte, editors, Fleet Management and Logistics, pages 1–31. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1998.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    E. Ukkonen. Finding approximate patterns in strings. Journal of Algorithms, 6:132–137, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    R.A. Wagner and M.J. Fischer. The string-to-string correction problem. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery, 21:168–173, 1974.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    J. Xu and J.P. Kelly. A network flow-based tabu search heuristic for the vehicle routing problem. Transportation Science, 30:379–393, 1996.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kenneth Sörensen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Applied EconomicsUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations