Advertisement

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 20, Issue 2, pp 421–426 | Cite as

A comparison of CO2, N2, and Ar to maximize plant nutrient retention in biochar

  • Zhongxin Tan
  • Limei Zhang
  • Qiaoyun Huang
Original Paper
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

Nutrient-rich biochar improves soil significantly; however, the nutrients nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P), and potassium (K) can be easily lost during the pyrolysis of straw feedstock. To resolve this problem, the mechanism for retaining the biochar nutrient elements in the solid, liquid, and gas products of pyrolysis under different atmospheric conditions and at different temperatures was studied systematically so that the best method for the preparation of the biochar could be determined. The observations are as follows: (1) the CO2 atmosphere was more favourable than the N2 atmosphere for biochar preparation; (2) at 400 °C, the carbon in the biochar was mainly in the form of conjugated aromatic carbon; (3) when the temperature increased from 300 to 600 °C, the nitrogen content in the biochar decreased from 88.42 to 39.02%; (4) most of the phosphorus and potassium were mainly retained in the biochar; (5) the lower pyrolysis temperature (400 °C) under a CO2 atmosphere is the best biochar preparation conditions for promoting lettuce growth.

Keywords

Agricultural waste Rice straw Biochar Nutrient distribution 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41571283) and National Key Research and Development Program of China (2016YFD0800702).

References

  1. Bao SD (2000) Soil agricultural chemistry analysis. China Agricultural Press, Beijing, pp 74–76Google Scholar
  2. Bourgel C, Veron E, Pokier J, Defoort F, Seller JM, Peregrina C (2011) Behavior of phosphorus and other inorganics during the gasification of sewage sludge. Energy Fuels 25:5707–5717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Jones DL, Edwards-Jones G, Murphy DV (2011) Biochar mediated alterations in herbicide breakdown and leaching in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 43:804–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Lehmann J, Silva JPD, Steiner C, Nehls T, Zech W, Glaser B (2003) Nutrient availability and leaching in an archaeological Anthrosol and a Ferralsol of the Central Amazon basin: fertilizer, manure and charcoal amendments. World Dev 249:343–357Google Scholar
  5. Liu B, Chen L, Xiao J (2006) Black carbon increases cation exchange capacity in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1719–1730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Moreno-Jiménez E, Fernández JM, Puschenreiter M, Williams PN, Plaza C (2016) Availability and transfer to grain of As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in a barley agri-system: impact of biochar, organic and mineral fertilizers. Agric Ecosyst Environ 219:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ren QQ, Zhao C, Wu X et al (2009) Effect of mineral matter on the formation of NOx precursors during biomass pyrolysis. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 85(s 1–2):447–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ren QQ, Zhao CS, Xin WU et al (2010) Formation of NOx precursors during wheat straw pyrolysis and gasification with O2 and CO2. Fuel 89:1064–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Silber A, Levkovitch I, Graber ER (2010) pH-dependent mineral release and surface properties of corn straw biochar: agronomic implications. Environ Sci Technol 44:9318–9323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhang H, Xiao R, Wang D et al (2011) Biomass fast pyrolysis in a fluidized bed reactor under N2, CO2, CO, CH4 and H2 atmospheres. Bioresour Technol 102:4258–4264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Zheng H, Wang Z, Deng X et al (2013) Characteristics and nutrient values of biochars produced from giant reed at different temperatures. Bioresour Technol 130:463–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Resources and EnvironmentHuazhong Agricultural UniversityWuhanPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations