Potential of diesel emissions reduction strategies in Xi’an, China
- 269 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
Diesel vehicles contributed 70 % of the NOx and more than 90 % of the PM in the 2014 on-road emissions inventory in China. Attention is therefore being focused on diesel vehicles because of their significantly higher NOx and PM emission rates and vehicle miles traveled, relative to gasoline-powered cars. Xi’an city has taken many measures to reduce diesel exhaust emissions. In this present study, the main objectives were to identify potential of emission-reduction strategies—fuel-standard improvements, elimination of “yellow-brand” vehicles, increased use of alternative fuels (CNG, LNG), and installation of DPFs in older vehicles—and to quantify the relative effectiveness of each of these potential strategies. A revised MOVES model was used to estimate PM and NOx emission inventories for selected scenarios at the county scale, for Xi’an city. The results show that, for NOx reduction, the best strategy would be fuel-standard improvements (Scenario 1), followed by (in order of effectiveness) the increased use of alternative fuels (Scenario 3), elimination of “yellow-brand” diesel vehicles (Scenario 2), and retrofitting older vehicles by installing DPFs (Scenario 4), whereas for PM10 or PM2.5, the effectiveness sequence of control strategies was found to be Scenario 1, Scenario 3, Scenario 2, and Scenario 4. It was also found that medium-weight and heavy trucks have a larger potential for NOx and PM reductions than do other vehicle types. These results are of paramount importance, not only for Xi’an but also for other cities that are considering adopting possible strategies to mitigate air pollution from vehicles.
Keywords
Diesel emissions Reduction strategies Potential weight PM NOxNotes
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 310822152006, 310822151024), the Chinese National Natural Science Fund (No. 51478045), and the Key Project of Major Problems in Science and Technology in Shaanxi Province, China (No. 2012KTZB03-01-04).
References
- Attfield MD, Schleiff PL, Lubin JH, Blair A, Stewart PA, Vermeulen R, Coble JB, Silverman DT (2012) The diesel exhaust in miners study: a cohort mortality study with emphasis on lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:869–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Elgowainy A, Rousseau A, Wang M, Ruth M, Andress D, Ward J, Joseck F, Nguyen T, Das S (2013) Cost of ownership and well-to-wheels carbon emissions/oil use of alternative fuels and advanced light-duty vehicle technologies. Energy Sustain Dev 17:626–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Franco V, Kousoulidou M, Muntean M, Ntziachristos L, Hausberger S, Dilara P (2013) Road vehicle emission factors development: a review. Atmos Environ 70:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Goyal P, Sidhartha (2003) Present scenario of air quality in Delhi: a case study of CNG implementation. Atmos Environ 37:5423–5431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hesterberg T, Lapin C, Bunn W (2008) A comparison of emissions from vehicles fueled with diesel or compressed natural gas. Environ Sci Technol 42(17):6437–6445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Johnson TV (2008) Diesel emission control in review. SAE technical paper series, No. 2008-01-0069Google Scholar
- Koebel M, Elsener M, Kleemann M (2000) Urea-SCR: a promising to reduce NOx emissions from automotive diesel engines. Catal Today 59:335–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lau CF, Rakowska A, Townsend T, Brimblecombe P, Chan TL, Yam YS, Mocnik G, Ning Z (2015) Evaluation of diesel fleet emissions and control policies from plume chasing measurements of on-road vehicles. Atmos Environ 122:171–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Liu HB, Wang YQ, Chen XH, Han S (2013) Vehicle emission and near-road air quality modeling in Shanghai, China, based on taxi GPS data and MOVES revised emission inventory. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2340:33–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ministry of Environmental Protection of China (2015) China vehicle emission control annual report 2014. http://www.vecc-mep.org.cn/news/spgg/P020141230404147970928.pdf
- Na K, Biswas S, Robertson W, Sahay K, Okamoto R, Mitchell A, Lemieux S (2015) Impact of biodiesel and renewable diesel on emissions of regulated pollutants and greenhouse gases on a 2000 heavy duty diesel truck. Atmos Environ 107:307–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Papson A, Hartley S, Browning L (2010) Cost-effectiveness of five emission reduction strategies for inland river tugs and towboats. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2166:109–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Resitoglu IA, Altinisik K, Keskin A (2015) The pollutant emissions from diesel-engine vehicles and exhaust aftertreatment systems. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:15–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Silverman DT, Samanic CM, Lubin JH, Blair AE, Stewart PA, Vermeulen R, Coble JB, Rothman N, Schleiff PL, Travis WD, Ziegler RG, Wacholder S, Attfield MD (2012) The diesel exhaust in miners study: a nested case-control study of lung cancer and diesel exhaust. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:855–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Squaiella L, Martins C, Lacava P (2013) Strategies for emission control in diesel engine to meet Euro VI. Fuel 104:183–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Vallamsundar S, Lin J (2011) MOVES Versus MOBILE comparison of greenhouse gas and criterion polltant emissions. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board (2233):27–35Google Scholar
- Yao Z, Wei H, Perugu H, Liu H, Li Z (2014) Sensitivity analysis of project level MOVES running emission rates for light and heavy duty vehicles. J Traffic Transp Eng (English Ed) 1:81–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yelverton TL, Holder AL, Pavlovic J (2015) Emissions removal efficiency from diesel gensets using aftermarket PM controls. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1861–1871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Q, Shen Z, Cao J, Zhang R, Zhang L, Huang RJ, Zheng C, Wang L, Liu S, Xu H, Zheng C, Liu P (2015) Variations in PM2.5, TSP, BC, and trace gases (NO2, SO2, and O3) between haze and non-haze episodes in winter over Xi’an, China. Atmos Environ 112:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar