Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 2701–2708 | Cite as

Catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of mushroom waste and waste oil to promote the formation of aromatics

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Catalytic fast pyrolysis is one of the most promising and prevailing technologies for the improvement of bio-oil quality. In this contribution, catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of mushroom waste and waste oil over HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst was conducted to promote the production of aromatics using pyrolysis–gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. The effects of pyrolysis temperature and waste oil to mushroom waste mass ratio on the pyrolytic product distribution were investigated and analyzed. The results showed that with temperature increasing, the relative contents of hydrocarbons increased at first and then decreased, and 600 °C was an optimum temperature as the maximum yield of hydrocarbons could be reached. Besides, the waste oil to mushroom waste mass ratio was of great significance in the catalytic fast co-pyrolysis process, and the total relative contents of hydrocarbons increased with the increasing of waste oil to mushroom waste ratio. On the other hand, a significant synergistic effect between waste oil and mushroom waste was studied during catalytic fast co-pyrolysis, which played an effective role in promoting the production of aromatics remarkably. Catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of waste oil and mushroom waste made a significant contribution to the practical utilization of biomass pyrolysis and provided an effective and efficient way to promote the upgrading of bio-oil.

Keywords

Catalytic fast co-pyrolysis Mushroom waste Waste oil Hydrocarbons Synergistic effect 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful for the financial support from the National Natural Science Fund Program of China (Nos. 51276040 and U1361115), the National Key Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) (No. 2013CB228106), the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University (No. YBJJ1430), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, the scientific innovation research program of college graduate in Jiangsu province (No. KYLX_0183), and China Scholarship Council (CSC).

References

  1. Abnisa F, Wan Daud WMA (2014) A review on co-pyrolysis of biomass: an optional technique to obtain a high-grade pyrolysis oil. Energy Convers Manag 87:71–85. doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.07.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abnisa F, Wan Daud WMA, Ramalingam S, Azemi MNBM, Sahu JN (2013) Co-pyrolysis of palm shell and polystyrene waste mixtures to synthesis liquid fuel. Fuel 108:311–318. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.02.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abnisa F, Daud WMAW, Sahu JN (2014) Pyrolysis of mixtures of palm shell and polystyrene: an optional method to produce a high-grade of pyrolysis oil. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 33:1026–1033. doi: 10.1002/ep.11850 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alper K, Tekin K, Karagöz S (2014) Pyrolysis of agricultural residues for bio-oil production. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:211–223. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0778-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hossain FM, Hasanuzzaman M, Rahim NA, Ping HW (2014) Impact of renewable energy on rural electrification in Malaysia: a review. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:859–871. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0861-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Huang Y, Wei L, Crandall Z, Julson J, Gu Z (2015) Combining Mo–Cu/HZSM-5 with a two-stage catalytic pyrolysis system for pine sawdust thermal conversion. Fuel 150:656–663. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.02.071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Isaksson J, Åsblad A, Berntsson T (2014) Pretreatment methods for gasification of biomass and Fischer-Tropsch crude production integrated with a pulp and paper mill. Clean Technol Environ Policy 16:1393–1402. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0815-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Li Y, Zhang C, Liu Y, Hou X, Zhang R, Tang X (2015) Coke deposition on ni/hzsm-5 in bio-oil hydrodeoxygenation processing. Energy Fuels 29:1722–1728. doi: 10.1021/ef5024669 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lorenzetti C, Conti R, Fabbri D, Yanik J (2016) A comparative study on the catalytic effect of H-ZSM5 on upgrading of pyrolysis vapors derived from lignocellulosic and proteinaceous biomass. Fuel 166:446–452. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.10.051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prasad L, Salvi BL, Kumar V (2014) Thermal degradation and gasification characteristics of Tung Shells as an open top downdraft wood gasifier feedstock. Clean Technol Environ Policy 17:1699–1706. doi: 10.1007/s10098-014-0891-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Shao S, Zhang H, Xiao R, Shen D, Zheng J (2013) Comparison of catalytic characteristics of biomass derivates with different structures over ZSM-5. BioEnergy Res 6:1173–1182. doi: 10.1007/s12155-013-9303-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tamiyakul S, Ubolcharoen W, Tungasmita DN, Jongpatiwut S (2015) Conversion of glycerol to aromatic hydrocarbons over Zn-promoted HZSM-5 catalysts. Catal Today 256:325–335. doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2014.12.030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Tian X, Li C, Yang H, Ye Z, Xu H (2011) Spent mushroom: a new low-cost adsorbent for removal of Congo red from aqueous solutions. Desalination Water Treat 27:319–326. doi: 10.5004/dwt.2011.2152 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Turrado Fernández S, Paredes Sánchez JP, Gutiérrez Trashorras AJ (2015) Analysis of forest residual biomass potential for bioenergy production in Spain. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:209–218. doi: 10.1007/s10098-015-1008-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Vochozka M, Maroušková A, Váchal J, Straková J (2015) Reengineering the paper mill waste management. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:323–329. doi: 10.1007/s10098-015-1012-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wang E, Ma X, Tang S, Yan R, Wang Y, Riley WW, Reaney MJT (2014) Synthesis and oxidative stability of trimethylolpropane fatty acid triester as a biolubricant base oil from waste cooking oil. Biomass Bioenergy 66:371–378. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Wang S, Cai Q, Chen J, Zhang L, Zhu L, Luo Z (2015) Co-cracking of bio-oil model compound mixtures and ethanol over different metal oxide-modified HZSM-5 catalysts. Fuel 160:534–543. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wu Z, Li H, Tu D (2015) Application of Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) Spectroscopy combined with chemometrics for analysis of rapeseed oil adulterated with refining and purificating waste cooking oil. Food Anal Methods 8:2581–2587. doi: 10.1007/s12161-015-0149-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zhang H, Zheng J, Xiao R, Shen D, Jin B, Xiao G, Chen R (2013) Co-catalytic pyrolysis of biomass and waste triglyceride seed oil in a novel fluidized bed reactor to produce olefins and aromatics integrated with self-heating and catalyst regeneration processes. RSC Adv 3:5769. doi: 10.1039/c3ra40694f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhang H, Nie J, Xiao R, Jin B, Dong C, Xiao G (2014) Catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and different plastics (polyethylene, polypropylene, and polystyrene) to improve hydrocarbon yield in a fluidized-bed reactor. Energy Fuels 28:1940–1947. doi: 10.1021/ef4019299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zhang B, Zhong Z-P, Wang X-B, Ding K, Song Z-W (2015a) Catalytic upgrading of fast pyrolysis biomass vapors over fresh, spent and regenerated ZSM-5 zeolites. Fuel Process Technol 138:430–434. doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2015.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhang B, Zhong Z, Ding K, Song Z (2015b) Production of aromatic hydrocarbons from catalytic co-pyrolysis of biomass and high density polyethylene: analytical Py–GC/MS study. Fuel 139:622–628. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zhang B, Zhong Z, Min M, Ding K, Xie Q, Ruan R (2015c) Catalytic fast co-pyrolysis of biomass and food waste to produce aromatics: analytical Py-GC/MS study. Bioresour Technol 189:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhang H, Xiao R, Nie J, Jin B, Shao S, Xiao G (2015d) Catalytic pyrolysis of black-liquor lignin by co-feeding with different plastics in a fluidized bed reactor. Bioresour Technol 192:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.05.040 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu J, Han M, Zhang G, Yang L (2015) Co-digestion of spent mushroom substrate and corn stover for methane production via solid-state anaerobic digestion. J Renew Sustain Energy 7:023135. doi: 10.1063/1.4919404 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Energy Thermal Conversion and Control, Ministry of Education, and School of Energy and EnvironmentSoutheast UniversityNanjingChina
  2. 2.Center for Biorefining and Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems EngineeringUniversity of MinnesotaMinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations