Self-organized traffic flow at the lightless intersection: algorithms, policies and simulations of the environmental impact
- 230 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
We propose an urban intersection control scheme without the need of the traffic light (lightless control), which leads to potentially disruptive improvement of efficiency of the intersection traffic flow and much reduced fuel consumption and green house gas (GHG) emissions. We in particular show that such lightless intersection control can be achieved with mature technologies; it can be understood as an enhanced version of the connected vehicles, with the installing an intersection cruise control (ICC) device in the vehicle. Simple algorithms of such intersection control and intuitive traffic policies associated with it make the control scheme easy to implement with minimal impact on traditional driving behaviours. Moreover, such control allows a mixture of vehicles with and without ICC device installed, and can coexist with conventional intersection control with traffic lights. We quantify improvements of our lightless intersection control scheme with realistic large-scale numerical simulation of the vehicle drive cycles and the appropriate energy models. In contrast to traditional signallized intersection control where severe congestion develops, the proposed lightless intersection control leads to a smooth, self-organized traffic flow and lower fuel use and emissions. This performance is demonstrated even under high traffic inflow conditions. In many cases, the environmental impact of the presence of the intersection is found to be negligible.
Keywords
Urban intersection control Lightless Fuel use GHG footprintNotes
Acknowledgments
This research was partially supported by Singapore A*STAR SERC “Complex Systems” Research Pro-gramme Grant 1224504056.
References
- Ahmane M, Abbas-Turki A, Perronnet F, Wu J, El Moudni A, Buisson J, Zeo R (2013) Modeling and controlling an isolated urban intersection based on cooperative vehicles. Trans Res C 28:44–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bando M, Hasebe K, Nakayama A, Shibata A, Sugiyama Y (1995) Dynamic model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys Rev E 51:1035–1042CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bazzan ALC (2005) A distributed approach for coordination of traffic signal agents. Auton Agents Multi-Agent Syst 10:131–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bazzan ALC, Oliveira D, Silva BC (2010) Learning in groups of traffic signals. Eng Appl Artif Intell 23:560–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Choy MC, Srinivasan D, Cheu RL (2003) Cooperative, hybrid agent architecture for real-time traffic signal control. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern A 33:597–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Crunewald M, Rust C, Withowski U (2006) Using mini robots for prototyping intersection management of vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international symposium on autonomous minirobots for research and edutainment (AMiRE 2005), 287–292Google Scholar
- Dresner K, Stone P (2008) A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. J Artif Intell Res 31:591–656Google Scholar
- Elmi A, Al Rifai N (2012) Pollutant emissions from passenger cars in traffic congestion situation in the State of Kuwait: options and challenges. Clean Technol Environ Policy 14:619–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gaciarz M, Aknine S, Bhouri N (2015) Automated negotiation for traffic regulation. CARE, IstanbulCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gong H, Liu H, Wang B (2008) An asymmetric full velocity difference car-following model. Phys A 387:2595–2602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Helbing D, Mazloumian A (2009) Operation regimes and slower-is-faster effect in the control of traffic intersections. Eur Phys J B 70:257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Junges R, Bazzan ALC (2008) Evaluating the performance of DCOP algorithms in a real world, dynamic problem. In: Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 2: 599–606Google Scholar
- Kerner BS (2009) Introduction to modern traffic flow theory and control: the long road to three-phase traffic theory. Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg and the references therein CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kerner BS, Konhauser P (1994) Structure and parameters of clusters in traffic flow. Phys Rev E 50:54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Naumann R, Rasche R, Tacken J, Tahedi C (1997) Validation and simulation of a decentralized intersection collision avoidance algorithm. In: Intelligent transportation system, 1997, ITSC ’97, IEEE conference, pp 818–823Google Scholar
- Panait L, Luke S (2005) Cooperative multi-agent learning: the state of the art. Auton Agent Multi Agent Syst 11:387–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Perronnet F, Abbas-Turki A, Buisson J, El Moudni A, Renan Z, Ahmane M (2012) Cooperative intersection management: real implementation and feasibility study of a sequence based protocol for urban applications. In: Intelligent transportation systems (ITSC), 2012 15th international IEEE conference, pp 42–47Google Scholar
- Raravi G, Shingde V, Ramamritham K, Bharadia J (2007) Next generation design and verification methodologies for distributed embedded control systemsGoogle Scholar
- Roozemond DA (2001) Using intelligent agents for pro-active, real-time urban intersection control. Eur J Oper Res 131:293–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasan D, Choy MC, Cheu RL (2006) Neural networks for real-time traffic signal control. IEEE Trans Intell Trans Syst 7:261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wu J, Abbas-Turki A, El-Moudni A (2012) Cooperative driving: an ant colony system for autonomous intersection management. Appl Intell 37:207–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang B, Monterola C (2015) Classification and unification of the microscopic deterministic traffic models. Phys Rev E 92:042802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yang B, Xu X, Pang J, Monterola C (2015) Non-linear dynamics, emergent behaviors and controlled expansions: towards effective modeling of the congested traffic. arXiv:1504.0125