Is e-reading environmentally more sustainable than conventional reading?
Technology is changing the way we read, with printed material being replaced by electronically published text such as e-books and e-newspapers. Although digitally published texts offer some advantages over printed material in terms of cost and ease of access, it is not immediately clear whether e-reading is environmentally a more sustainable alternative to conventional reading. Therefore, this paper reviews the literature and compares the environmental impacts of the two reading alternatives, taking a life cycle approach. The review of various studies indicates that there are large variations in the impacts for e-readers as well as the printed material, mainly owing to different assumptions. Nevertheless, the results of this work indicate clearly that e-reading can only be environmentally sustainable at very high usage rates, as manufacturing of e-readers has relatively high environmental impacts.
KeywordsBooks E-books E-paper Newspapers LCA Carbon footprint
- Apple (2013) iPad environmental reports. www.apple.com/uk/environment/reports Accessed 10 Feb 2014
- Deetman S, Odegard I (2009) Scanning life cycle assessment of printed and e-paper documents based on the iRex digital reader. Institute of Environmental Sciences (CML), Leiden University, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- Enroth M (2009) Environmental impact of printed and electronic teaching aids, a screening study focusing on fossil carbon dioxide emission. In: Advances in printing and media technology. Proceedings of the 36th International Research Conference of IARIGAI, Stockholm, Sweden, 36:23–30Google Scholar
- Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, De Koning A (2001) Life cycle assessment: an operational guide to the ISO standards; Part 2a. Institute of Environmental Sciences, University of Leiden, LeidenGoogle Scholar
- IDC (2013) Worldwide and US Tablet 2013 -2017 Forecast Update, www.idc.com Accessed 10 Feb 2014
- Kozak G (2003) Printed scholarly books and e-book reading devices: a comparative life cycle assessment of two book options. Centre for Sustainable Systems, University of Michigan, MichiganGoogle Scholar
- Pihkola H, Nors M, Kujanpää M, Helin T, Kariniemi M, Pajula T, Dahlbo H, Koskela S (2010) Carbon footprint and environmental impacts of print products from cradle to grave. Results from the LEADER project (Part 1). VTT Tiedotteita—Research Notes 2560, Helsinki, FinlandGoogle Scholar
- PwC (PricewaterhouseCoopers) (2011) Turning the page: The future of ebooks, www.pwc.com Accessed 10 Feb 2014
- Wischenbart R, Carrenho C, Kovac M, Licher V, Mallya V (2013) Global ebook—a report on market trends and development, updated Fall 2013. Rüdiger Wischenbart Content and Consulting, SebastopolGoogle Scholar