The production of biofuel from biomass waste is of great interest to the scientific community regarding the discovery of solutions to global energy demand and global warming. The pyrolysis of biomass to produce bio-oil is an easy, cheap and promising technology. In the current investigation, the pyrolysis of two different biomasses (cornelian cherry stones and grape seeds) was achieved at temperatures ranging from 300 to 700 °C. The effect of pyrolysis temperatures on the yields of each product was significant. The bio-oil yields were maximized at 500 °C for cornelian cherry stones and 700 °C for grape seeds. The compositions of bio-oils for both cornelian cherry stones and grape seeds were similar and contained mainly oxygenated hydrocarbons. The compounds observed in this investigation were composed of phenols, alkyl benzenes, alkanes, alkenes, fatty acids, fatty acid esters and a few nitrogen-containing compounds. Bio-char properties were amended in association with both the pyrolysis temperature and biomass type. Bio-chars from cornelian cherry stones contained higher carbon and lower oxygen levels than those from grape seeds under identical conditions. Increases in pyrolysis temperatures produced bio-chars containing higher carbon levels and heating values for both carnelian cherry stones and grape seeds.
Pyrolysis Cornelian cherry stone Grape seeds Bio-oil Bio-char
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Houshfar E, Wang L, Vaha- Savo N, Brink A, Lovas T (2014) Characterisation of CO/NO/SO2 emission and ash-forming elements from the combustion and pyrolysis process. Clean Technol Environ Policy. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0762-3Google Scholar
Jin F, Enomoto H (2011) Rapid and highly selective conversion of biomass into value-added products in hydrothermal conditions: chemistry of acid/basecatalysed and oxidation reaction. Energy Environ Sci 4:382–397. doi:10.1039/C004268DCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lievens C, Yperman J, Cornelissen T, Carleer R (2008) Study of the potential valorisation of heavy metal contaminated biomass via phytoremediation by fast pyrolysis: part II: characterisation of the liquid and gaseous fraction as a function of the temperature. Fuel 87:1906–1916. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2007.10.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHenry MP (2009) Agricultural bio-char production, renewable energy generation and farm carbon sequestration in Western Australia: certainty, uncertainty and risk. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2008.08.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torri C, Lesci IG, Fabbri D (2009) Analytical study on the production of a hydroxylactone from catalytic pyrolysis of carbohydrates with nanopowder aluminium titanate. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis 84:25–30. doi:10.1016/j.jaap.2008.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vassilev SV, Baxter D, Vassileva CG (2013) An overview of the behaviour of biomass during combustion: part I. Phase-mineral transformations of organic and inorganic matter. Fuel 112:391–449. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.05.043CrossRefGoogle Scholar