Advertisement

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 477–488 | Cite as

Promotion of wind energy in isolated energy systems: the case of the Orites wind farm

  • Paris A. FokaidesEmail author
  • Irene-Chrysovalanto Miltiadous
  • Marina K.-A. Neophytou
  • Lia-Paschalia Spyridou
Original Paper

Abstract

With the establishment of the first wind farm on the island, Cyprus has made progress to satisfy the European Union’s 2020 renewable energy targets. Operational since September 2010, the 174 M€ Orites wind farm is currently the largest wind project in the Mediterranean region. In this article, the main characteristics of the project with regard to Cyprus’s national action plan for the promotion of renewable energy sources are presented. The socio-economic impacts of the project and its feasibility in the context of an isolated energy system are also examined. The results of a public survey to identify the attitudes of surrounding households and neighbouring cities towards the wind farm are presented. The assessment was based on face-to-face interviews conducted with 50 households from the surrounding communities and 100 interviewees from neighbouring cities. According to the survey, the public opinion on the wind farm was generally positive, and the majority of the respondents considered the wind farm to be acceptable as of no considerable environmental impact.

Keywords

Wind farm NIMBY Apparent YIMBY 

List of symbols

Variables

A

Slope, Weibull graphical solution

B

Intercept with y-ordinate, Weibull graphical solution

C

Weibull scale parameter (m/s)

E

East (coordinates) (°, ′)

f

Probability density function (%)

F

Cumulative distribution function (%)

k

Weibull shape parameter

N

Power (W)

N

North (coordinates) (°, ′)

U

Wind velocity (m/s)

VTS

Technical availability (according to VDI 3423) (%)

X

Logarithmic transformation parameter, Weibull graphical solution

Y

Logarithmic transformation parameter, Weibull graphical solution

Greek letters

η

Number of wind turbines

ω

Power coefficient

Accents

Fluctuation

Average

Indices

0

Nominal

cal

Calculated

e

Electric

meas

Measured

Abbreviations

EAC

Electricity Authority of Cyprus

EC

European Council

EMF

Electromagnetic fields

EU

European Union

GDP

Gross domestic product

RES

Renewable energy sources

WASP

Wind atlas analysis and application programme

WTA

Willingness to accept

WTP

Willingness to pay

References

  1. Akdag SA, Bagiorgas HS, Mihalakakou G (2010) Use of two-component Weibull mixtures in the analysis of wind speed in the Eastern Mediterranean. Appl Energy 87:2566–2573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuationGoogle Scholar
  3. Chang TP (2011) Performance comparison of six numerical methods in estimating Weibull parameters for wind energy application. Appl Energy 88:272–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cochran WG (1977) Sampling techniques, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. de Vries BJM, van Vuuren DP, Hoogwijk MM (2007) Renewable energy sources: their global potential for the first-half of the 21st century at a global level: an integrated approach. Energy Policy 35:2590–2610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Department of Energy and Climate Change UK (2010) Digest of United Kingdom energy statistics 2010. National Statistics publication, Newport. ISBN 9780115155260Google Scholar
  7. Devine-Wright P (2005) Beyond NIMBYism: towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 8:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Devine-Wright P (2007) Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: a critical review. Working paper of the research project “Beyond Nimbyism: a multidisciplinary investigation of public engagement with renewable energy technologies”. http://www.sed.manchester.ac.uk/research/beyond_nimbyism/. Accessed 31 Aug 2010
  9. Ek C (2005) Public and private attitudes towards “green” electricity: the case of Swedish wind power. Energy Policy 33:1677–1689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Electricity Authority of Cyprus (2009) Annual report, ISSN 0258-4875Google Scholar
  11. Europe’s energy portal (2011) http://www.energy.eu/. Accessed 21 Jan 2011
  12. European Parliament and Council (2009) Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Off J Eur Union, L 140/16Google Scholar
  13. Faux J (2010) Pre-testing survey instruments. Glob Rev Acc Finance 1:100–111Google Scholar
  14. Gamboa G, Munda G (2007) The problem of wind farm location: a social multi-criteria evaluation framework. Energy Policy 35:1564–1583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haggett C (2011) Understanding public responses to off-shore wind power. Energy Policy 39:503–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hau E (2006) Wind turbines. Fundamentals, technologies, applications, economics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Horowitz JK, McConnell KE (2002) A review of WTA/WTP studies. J Environ Econ Manag 44:426–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jensen ThL (2000) Renewable energy on small islands, 2nd edn. Forum for Energy & Development, a Danish NGOGoogle Scholar
  19. Jobert A, Laborgne P, Mimler S (2007) Local acceptance of wind energy: factors of success identified in French and German case studies. Energy Policy 35:2751–2760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones CR, Eiser JR (2010) Understanding ‘local’ opposition to wind development in the UK: how big is a backyard? Energy Policy 38:3106–3117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kaldellis JK (1999) Wind energy management (in Greek). Stamoulis publications, Athens. ISBN 960-351-255-9Google Scholar
  22. Kaldellis JK (2002) An integrated time-depending feasibility analysis model of wind energy applications in Greece. Energy Policy 30:267–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaldellis JK (2005) Social attitude towards wind energy applications in Greece. Energy Policy 33:595–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaldellis JK, Kavadias KA (2007) Cost–benefit analysis of remote hybrid wind–diesel power stations: case study Aegean Sea islands. Energy Policy 35:1525–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaldellis JK, Zafirakis D (2007) Present situation and future prospects of electricity generation in Aegean Archipelago islands. Energy Policy 35:4623–4639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koroneos C, Fokaides P, Moussiopoulos N (2005) Cyprus energy system and the use of renewable energy sources. Energy 30:1889–1901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krohn S, Damborg S (1999) On public attitudes towards wind power. Renew Energy 16:954–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lomborg B (2001) The skeptical environmentalist: measuring the real state of the world. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. ISBN 0-521-80447-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Marrero GA, Ramos-Real FJ (2010) Electricity generation cost in isolated system: the complementarities of natural gas and renewables in the Canary Islands. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14:2808–2818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neocleous A (2005) Evaluation of electromagnetic fields (EMF) in schools in Cyprus. Environmentalist 25:247–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pashardes S (1995) Statistical analysis of wind speed in Cyprus. Meteorological Service Cyprus, Meteorological Report No. 14Google Scholar
  32. Pashardes S, Christofides C (1995) Statistical analysis of wind speed and direction in Cyprus. Sol Energy 55:405–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pedhazur EJ (1997) Multiple regression in behavioral research, 3rd edn. Harcourt Brace College Publishers, San Diego. ISBN 0-03-072831-2Google Scholar
  34. Rehfeldt K (1999) Windenergienutzung in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland-stand 31.12.1998. DEWI Magazine 14:6–22Google Scholar
  35. Republic of Cyprus, Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Tourism (2010) National Renewable Energy Action Plan for Cyprus, Article 4 of the Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/ECGoogle Scholar
  36. Seguro JV, Lambert TW (2000) Modern estimation of the parameters of the Weibull wind speed distribution for wind energy analysis. Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 85:75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Statistical Service of Cyprus (2001) Census of population, vol III. Government Printing Office, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. Swofford J, Slattery M (2010) Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy 38:2508–2519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure (1998) Verfugbarkeit von Maschinen und Anlagen, Begriffe, Definitionen, Zeiterfassung und Berechnung. VDI Richtlinie 3423Google Scholar
  40. Weisser D (2004) On the economics of electricity consumption in small island developing states: a role for renewable energy technologies? Energy Policy 32:127–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wikimapia (2013) http://wikimapia.org/16252079/Orites-Wind-Farm. Accessed 19 May 2013
  42. Wolsink M (2000) Wind power and the NIMBY-myth: institutional capacity and the limited significance of public support. Renew Energy 21:49–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wüstenhagen R, Wolsink M, Bürer MJ (2007) Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: an introduction to the concept. Energy Policy 35:2683–2691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhang J, Chowdhury S, Messac A, Castillo L (2012) A response surface-based cost model for wind farm design. Energy Policy 42:538–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paris A. Fokaides
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Irene-Chrysovalanto Miltiadous
    • 2
  • Marina K.-A. Neophytou
    • 2
  • Lia-Paschalia Spyridou
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Engineering and Applied SciencesFrederick UniversityNicosiaCyprus
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUniversity of CyprusNicosiaCyprus
  3. 3.Department of Communication and Internet StudiesCyprus University of TechnologyLimassolCyprus

Personalised recommendations