Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 16, Issue 2, pp 369–376 | Cite as

Evaluation of various pre-treatment processes on tannery sludge for enhancement of soluble chemical oxygen demand

  • K. Sri Bala Kameswari
  • Chitra Kalyanaraman
  • K. Thanasekaran
Original Paper

Abstract

Overall sludge generation during the treatment of tannery wastewater is in the range of 18,200–165,200 tons per annum in India. One of the major problems faced by the tanning industry in India is the disposal of sludge. In recent years, increased attention has been given to minimization of waste sludge in wastewater treatment process. At present, each tannery is spending around Rs. 700–750 per ton for disposal of sludge into secured landfill facilities. Anaerobic digestion is one of the options for generation of biogas from primary and secondary sludge and to reduce sludge volume. In order to make anaerobic digestion more effective, pre-treatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion is the recent technological advancement employed to accelerate the rate of hydrolysis process. Various pre-treatment processes such as ozonation, sonication, hydrogen peroxide, alkaline, and alkaline thermal treatment were evaluated in the present study for increasing the soluble chemical oxygen demand separately in primary and secondary sludge generated during treatment of tannery wastewater. It was observed from the results obtained from the study that the increase in SCOD by various pre-treatments were in the order of ozonation > alkaline thermal treatment > sonication > alkaline treatment > hydrogen peroxide. The increase in the ratio of SCOD to TCOD by pre-treatments was effective for secondary sludge rather than primary sludge.

Keywords

Pre-treatment  Primary sludge  Secondary sludge  Soluble chemical oxygen demand 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), India to undertake the study under the ZERIS-XII Five Year Plan Network project. The authors would like also to thank the Director, Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI) India for permitting to publish this work.

References

  1. APHA (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Clesceri LS, Greenberg AE, Eaton AD (Ed), American Public Health Association, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  2. Beltran FJ (2005) Ozone reaction kinetics for water and wastewater. Lewis, New York, p 133Google Scholar
  3. Bougrier C, Albasi C, Delgenes JP, Carrere H (2006) Effect of ultrasonic, thermal and ozone pre-treatments on waste activated sludge solubilisation and anaerobic biodegradability. Chem Eng Process 45:711–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carballa M, Manterola G, Larrea L, Ternes T, Omil F, Lema JM (2007) Influence of ozone pre-treatment on sludge anaerobic digestion: removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products. Chemosphere 67:1444–1452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cesbron D, Deleris S, Debellefontaine H, Roustan M, Paul E (2003) Study of competition for ozone between soluble and particulate matter during activated sludge ozonation. Trans IchemE 81:1165–1170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiu YC, Chang CN, Lin JG, Huang SJ (1997) Alkaline and ultrasonic pre-treatment of sludge before anaerobic digestion. Water Sci Technol 36:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu L-B, Yan S-T, Xing X-H, An-Feng Y, Sun X-L, Jurcik B (2008) Enhanced sludge solubilization by microbubble ozonation. Chemosphere 72:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Crittenden JC, Hu S, Hand DW, Green SA (1999) A kinetic model for H2O2/UV process in a completely mixed batch reactor. Water Res 33:2315–2328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dichtl N, Muller J, Braunschweig EE, Gunthert FW, Osswald MO (1997) Waste sludge disintegration–a recent overview. Korrespondenz Abwasser 44:1726–1739Google Scholar
  10. Dogan I, Sanin FD (2009) Alkaline solubilization and microwave irradiation as a combined sludge disintegration and minimization method. Water Res 43:2139–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eastman JA, Ferguson JF (1981) Solubilization of particulate organic carbon during the acid phase of anaerobic digestion. J WPCF 53:352–366Google Scholar
  12. Elliott A, Mahmood T (2007) Review-pretreatment technologies for advancing anaerobic digestion of pulp and paper biotreatment residues. Water Res 4:4273–4286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goel R, Tokutomi T, Yasui H (2003) Anaerobic digestion of excess activated sludge with ozone pretreatment. Water Sci Technol 47(12):207–214Google Scholar
  14. Kameswari KSB, Chitra K, Thanasekaran K (2011) Effect of ozonation and ultrasonication pretreatment processes on co-digestion of tannery solid wastes. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13(3):517–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kepp U, Solheim OE (2000) Thermo dynamical assessment of the digestion process. 5th European Biosolids and Organic Residuals Conference. Wakefield, UKGoogle Scholar
  16. Kim J, Park C, Tak-hyun K, Myunggu L, Sangyong K, Seung-wook K, Jinwon L (2003) Effects of various pretreatments for enhanced anaerobic digestion with waste activated sludge. J Biosci Bioeng 95(3):271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kim T-H, Lee S-R, Nama Y-K, Yang J, Park C, Lee M (2009) Disintegration of excess activated sludge by hydrogen peroxide Oxidation. Desalination 246:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lehne G, Müller A, Schwedes J (2001) Mechanical disintegration of sewage sludge. Water Sci Technol 43(1):19–26Google Scholar
  19. Li YY, Noike T (1992) Upgrading of anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge by thermal pretreatment. Water Sci Technol 26(34):857–866Google Scholar
  20. Liu Y (2003) Chemically reduced excess sludge production in the activated sludge process. Chemosphere 50:1–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nah IW, Kang YW, Hwang KY, Song WK (2000) Mechanical pretreatment of waste activated sludge for anaerobic digestion process. Water Res 34(8):2362–2368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pavlostathis SG, Gossett JM (1986) A kinetic model for anaerobic digestion of biological sludge. Biotechnol Bioeng 27:1519–1530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Rajan RV, Lin JG, Ray BT (1989) Low level chemical pretreatment for enhanced sludge solubilisation. Res J Water Pollut Control Fed 61:1678–1683Google Scholar
  24. Show K–Y, Mao T, Lee D-J (2007) Optimisation of sludge disruption by sonication. Water Res 41:4741–4747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tanaka S, Kobayashi T, Kamiyama KI, Bildan LN (1997) Effects of thermochemical pretreatment on the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 35(8):209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tiehm A, Nickel K, Zellhorn M, Neis U (2001) Ultrasonic waste activated sludge disintegration for improving anaerobic stabilization. Water Res 35(8):2003–2009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tokumura M, Sekine M, Yashinari M, Hussein TZ, Kawase Y (2007) Photo-fenton process for excess sludge disintegration. Process Biochem 42:627–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Torres ML, Mdel CEL (2008) Effect of alkaline pretreatment on anaerobic digestion of solid wastes. Waste Manage (Oxford) 28(11):2229–2234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Vlyssides A, Karlis P (2004) Thermal-alkaline solubilization of waste activated sludge as a pre-treatment for anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 91:201–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Weemaes M, Verstraete W (1998) Evaluation of current wet sludge disintegration techniques. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 73:83–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weemaes M, Grootaerd H, Simoens F, Verstraete W (2000) Anaerobic digestion of ozonized biosolids. Water Res 34(8):2330–2336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Woodard SE, Wukasch RF (1994) A hydrolysis/thickening/filtration process for the treatment of waste activated sludge. Water Sci Technol 30:29–38Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Sri Bala Kameswari
    • 1
  • Chitra Kalyanaraman
    • 1
  • K. Thanasekaran
    • 2
  1. 1.Environmental Technology Division, CSIR - Central Leather Research Institute (CLRI)ChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Centre for Environmental Studies, Anna UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations