Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 6, pp 1055–1062 | Cite as

Production of green energy from co-digestion: perspectives for the Province of Cuneo, energetic balance and environmental sustainability

  • Deborah Panepinto
  • Giuseppe Genon
  • Enrico Brizio
  • Daniele Russolillo
Original Paper


In Italy and many European countries, energy production from biomass is encouraged by strong economic subsidies so that biomass energy plants are getting large diffusion. Nevertheless, it is necessary to define the environmental compatibility taking into account global parameters as well as environmental impacts at regional and local scales coming from new polluting emissions. The environmental balances regarding new energy plants are of primary importance within very polluted areas such as Northern Italy where air quality limits are systematically exceeded, in particular for PM10, NO2, and ozone. The paper analyzes the renewable energy scenario relating to manure anaerobic digestion and biogas production for the Province of Cuneo, N–W Italy, and the environmental sustainability of the possible choices. The study is focused on energy producibility, heat and power, nitrogen oxides and ammonia emissions, GHG (greenhouse gases) balances dealing also with indirect releases of CH4 and N2O, as well as emissions due to energy crops production. The most important conclusion that can be drawn is that the production of renewable energy from anaerobic digestion could cover up to 13 % of the Province electricity consumption, but sustainability in terms of CO2 emissions can be reached only through an overriding use of agricultural waste products (manure and by-products instead of energy crops) and cogeneration of thermal energy at disposal; the application of the best available techniques to waste gas cleaning, energy recovery, and digestate chemical–physical treatments allows positive emissive balances.


Anaerobic digestion NOx Ammonia Environmental balances Energy efficiency Biomass 


  1. Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Amon T (2006) Influence of different methods of covering slurry stores on greenhouse gas and ammonia emissions. Int Congr Ser 1293:315–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balsari P, Menardo S (2010) Vantaggi dei pre-trattamenti delle biomasse in ingresso al digestore. Distretto Energetica, TorinoGoogle Scholar
  3. Blengini GA, Brizio E, Cibrario M, Genon G (2011) LCA of bioenergy chains in Piedmont (Italy): a case study to support public decision makers towards sustainability. Resour Conserv Recycl 57:36–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borjesson P, Berglund M (2007) Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part II: the environmental impact of replacing various reference systems. Biomass Bioenergy 31:326–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brizio E, Genon G (2005) Environmental compatibility of renewable energy plants, air pollution XVIII. Wessex Institute of Technology Press, Southampton, pp 149–159Google Scholar
  6. Buratti C, Fantozzi F (2010) Life cycle assessment of biomass production: development of a methodology to improve the environmental indicators and testing with fiber sorghum energy crop. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1513–1522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cherubini F (2010) GHG balances of bioenergy systems—overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns. Renew Energy 35:1565–1573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cibrario M, (2010) Final Thesis Sostenibilità ambientale delle filiere bio-energetiche dedicate: analisi degli impatti relativi alla digestione anaerobica delle colture energetiche con metodologia LCA, Politecnico di Torino, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  9. De Leeuw F (2002) A set of emission indicators for long range transboundary air pollution. Environ Sci Policy 5:135–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giugliano M, Lonati G (2005) Polveri fini in atmosfera: la componente secondaria, Energia 3/2005, July 2005Google Scholar
  11. Jury C, Benetto E, Koster D, Schmitt B, Welfring J (2010) Life cycle assessment of biogas production by monofermentation of energy crops and injection into the natural gas grid. Biomass Bioenergy 34:54–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaparaju PLN, Rintala JA (2003) Effects of temperature on post-methanation of digested dairy cow manure in a farm-scale biogas production system. Environ Technol 24:1315–1321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kolář L, Kužel S, Peterka J, Borová-Batt J (2011) Utilisation of waste from digesters for biogas production, Chapter 9. In: Dos Santos Bernardes MA (ed) Biofuel’s Engineering Process Technology. INTECH, RijekaGoogle Scholar
  14. Lehtomaki A, Huttunen S, Rintala JA (2007) Laboratory investigations on co-digestion of energy crops and crop residues with cow manure for methane production: effect of crop to manure ratio. Resour Conserv Recycl 51:591–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maroušek J (in press-a) Removal of hardly fermentable ballast from the maize silage to accelerate biogas production, Industrial crop and ProductsGoogle Scholar
  16. Maroušek J (in press-b), Pretreatment of sunflower stalks for biogas production, Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 1–6Google Scholar
  17. Maroušek J (in press-c) Study on agriculture decision- makers behavior on sustainable energy utilization, J Agric Environ EthicsGoogle Scholar
  18. Maroušek J, Kawamitsu Y, Ueno M, Kondo Y, Kolář L (2012) Methods for improving methane yield from rye straw. Appl Eng Agric 28:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Panichnumsin P, Nopharatana A, Ahring B, Chaiprasert P (2010) Production of methane by co-digestion of cassava pulp with various concentrations of pig manure. Biomass Bioenergy 34:1117–1124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Poschl M, Ward S, Owende P (2010) Evaluation of energy efficiency of various biogas production and utilization pathways. Appl Energy 87:3305–3321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Renewable energy from crops and agrowastes (2004) CROPGEN Project, D17: Database on the methane production potential from mixed digestion, website Accesed on 12 July 2012
  22. Schlamadinger B, Apps M, Bohlin F, Gustavsson L, Jungmeier G, Marland G, Pingoud K, Savolainen I (1997) Towards a standard methodology for greenhouse gas balances of bioenergy systems in comparison with fossil energy systems. Biomass Bioenergy 13:359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weiland P (2003) Production and energetic use of biogas from energy crops and wastes in Germany. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 109:263–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah Panepinto
    • 1
  • Giuseppe Genon
    • 1
  • Enrico Brizio
    • 2
  • Daniele Russolillo
    • 3
  1. 1.DIATIPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly
  2. 2.ARPA PiemonteCuneoItaly
  3. 3.Fondazione per l’Ambiente Teobaldo Fenoglio ONLUSTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations