Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 15, Issue 1, pp 81–91 | Cite as

An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: a lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability

  • Muluken Yeheyis
  • Kasun Hewage
  • M. Shahria Alam
  • Cigdem Eskicioglu
  • Rehan Sadiq
Original Paper

Abstract

The construction and demolition (C&D) waste generated by the Canadian construction industry accounts for 27 % of the total municipal solid waste disposed in landfills. However, it is evident that over 75 % of what the construction industry generates as waste has a residual value, and therefore could be recycled, salvaged and/or reused. The need for comprehensive and integrated waste management mechanisms, technologies, rating systems and policies is widely recognized. Owing to increasing C&D waste volumes, shortage of landfills and long-term adverse environmental, economic and social impacts of the disposed C&D waste, sustainable C&D waste management is becoming increasingly essential to protect public health and natural ecosystems. This paper proposes a conceptual C&D waste management framework to maximise the 3R (reduce, reuse and recycle) and minimise the disposal of construction waste by implementing sustainable and comprehensive strategy throughout the lifecycle of construction projects. In addition, a life cycle based C&D waste sustainability index is developed. This approach can be used to make decisions related to selection of material, sorting, recycle/reuse and treatment or disposal options for C&D waste.

Keywords

Construction and demolition waste Waste management Sustainability Lifecycle analysis (LCA) 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Authors thankfully acknowledge the financial support of Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada through ENGAGE and DG programs of second and the last authors.

References

  1. Abbas A, Fathifazl G, Isgor OB, Razaqpur AG, Fournier B, Foo S (2006) Environmental benefits of green concrete. In: EIC Climate Change Technology, 2006 IEEE, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  2. Albulescu CT (2010) Forecasting the Romanian financial system stability using a stochastic simulation model. Romanian J Econ Forecast 13(1):81–98Google Scholar
  3. BC Government (2011) Office of the premier. http://www2.news.gov.bc.ca/news_releases_2005-2009/2009OTP0050-000394.htm. Accessed 26 Nov 2011
  4. Bossink BAG, Brouwers HJH (1996) Construction waste: quantification and source evaluation. J Constr Eng Manag 122:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brydon L (2011) The role of waste management in LEED Canada: Canada Green Building Council. http://www.owma.org. Accessed 25 June 2011
  6. CCA (Canadian Construction Association) (1992) Waste management for the construction industry. http://www.nrtee-trnee.com/eng/publications/waste-management-construction/waste-management-construction.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2011
  7. Chung SS, Lo CWH (2003) Evaluating sustainability in waste management: the case of construction and demolition, chemical and clinical wastes in Hong Kong. Resour Conserv Recycl 37:119–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cochran K, Townsend T, Reinhart D, Heck H (2007) Estimation of regional building related C&D debris generation and composition: case study for Florida. Waste Manage (Oxford) 27:921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Committee BIM (2007) The National BIM Standard. http://www.buildingsmartalliance.org/nbims/about.php. Retrieved 5 Oct 2009
  10. CIC (Canada Infrastructure Conference) (2009) Daily commercial news and construction record. http://dcnonl.com/article/id30927. Retrieved 8 Oct 2009
  11. Dolan PJ, Richard GL, Jacqueline CD (1999) Concepts for reuse and recycling of construction and demolition waste. US Army Corps of Engineers, Construction Engineering Research Laboratories, SACERL Technical Report 97/58Google Scholar
  12. Ekanayake LL, Ofori G (2000) Construction material waste source evaluation. In: Proceedings of 2nd Southern African conference on sustainable development the built environment: strategies for a sustainable built environment, Pretoria, South Africa, 23–25 August 2000, pp 35, 35-1–35-6Google Scholar
  13. Ekanayake LL, Ofori G (2004) Building waste assessment score: design-based tool. Build Environ 39(7):851–861CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Faniran OO, Caban G (1993) Minimizing waste on construction project sites. Eng Constr Archit Manag 5(2):182–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freudenberg M (2003) Composite indicators of country performance: a critical assessment. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2003/16. Paris, OECDGoogle Scholar
  16. Gavilan RM, Bernold LE (1994) Source evaluation of solid waste in building construction. J Constr Eng Manag 120(3):536–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goedert JD, Meadati P (2008) Integrating construction process documentation into building information modeling. J Constr Eng Manag 134(7):509–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hendriks CF, Pietersen HS (2000) Sustainable raw materials: construction and demolition waste. RILEM PublicationGoogle Scholar
  19. Hermans E, Van den Bosscheb F, Wets G (2008) Combining road safety information in a performance index. Accid Anal Prev 40:1337–1344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hewage KN, Ruwanpura JY (2007) A novel solution for construction on-site communication—the information booth. Can J Civ Eng 36:659–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Khan FI, Sadiq R, Veitch B (2004) Lifecycle IndeX (LInX): a new indexing procedure for process and product design and decision-making. J Clean Prod 12(1):59–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice-Hall International, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  23. LEED (2009) Understanding Green Building Program Options for Schools CHPS® Criteria & LEED®. http://www.neep.org/HPSE/CHPS%20LEED%20Comparison.pdf. Retrieved 16 Aug 2009
  24. Marchettini N, Ridolfi R, Rustici M (2007) An environmental analysis for comparing waste management options and strategies. Waste Manage (Oxford) 27:562–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morris MD (1979) Measuring the condition of the world’s poor: the physical quality of life index. Pergamon Policy Studies, vol 42. Pergamon Press, NewYork, pp 20–56Google Scholar
  26. Nardo M, Saisana M, Saltelli A, Tarantola S (2005) Tools for composite indicators building, EUR 21682 EN, European Commission, JRC-IPSC, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  27. Nehdi M, Sumner J (2003) Recycling waste latex paint in concrete. Cem Concr Res 33(6):857–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Osmani M, Glass J, Price ADF (2008) Architects’ perspectives on construction waste reduction by design. Waste Manage (Oxford) 28(7):1147–1158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Poon CS (2007) Editorial—reducing construction waste. Waste Manage (Oxford) 27:1715–1716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. PWGSC (Public Works and Government Services Canada) (2011) Construction, renovation and demolition waste: the environmentally responsible construction and renovation handbook (Chapter 8). http://www.tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca/biens-property/gd-env-cnstrctn/page-8-eng.html. Accessed 25 June 2011
  31. Reza B, Sadiq R, Hewage K (2011) Sustainability assessment of flooring systems in the city of Tehran: an AHP-based lifecycle analysis. Constr Build Mater 25(4):2053–2066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S (2008) Developing environmental indices using fuzzy numbers ordered weighted averaging (FN-OWA) operators. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 22(5):495–505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saltelli A (2006) Composite indicators between analysis and advocacy. Soc Indic Res 81:65–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Slater E, Alam MS (2011) Sustainable green concrete made with FRP scrap and recycled concrete aggregate. Part 1: fresh properties, submitted. ASCE J Mater Civ Eng, manuscript no. JRNMTENG-S-11-00612Google Scholar
  35. Smith D (2006) Innovation “reality” style. Alberta Construction Magazine, May/June, 53–55Google Scholar
  36. Somlikova R, Wachowiak MP (2001) Aggregation operators for selection problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst 131:23–34Google Scholar
  37. Spies S (2009) 3R in Construction and Demolition Waste (CDW)—potentials and constraints. GTZ—German Technical Cooperation, Inaugural Meeting of the Regional 3R Forum in Asia, Tokyo, Japan. www.uncrd.or.jp/env/spc/. Accessed 24 Nov 2011
  38. Statistics Canada (2000) Waste Management Industry Survey 2000-Business and Government Sectors Survey Guide, Environment Accounts and Statistics Division, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  39. USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency) (1995) Construction and demolition waste landfills. Prepared by ECF Incorporated, Contract No. 68-W3-0008, February. http://www.epa.gov/epaoswer/hazwaste/sqg/const/cdrpt.pdf. Accessed 24 Nov 2011
  40. Vleck RE (2001) Advanced construction and demolition waste management for Florida builders, Masters Thesis, ME Rinker School of Building Construction, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USAGoogle Scholar
  41. Wolf COH (2009) The performance and value creation of NOCs: an analytical framework. Background Paper for the Study on National Oil Companies and Value Criterion, World Bank, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muluken Yeheyis
    • 1
  • Kasun Hewage
    • 1
  • M. Shahria Alam
    • 1
  • Cigdem Eskicioglu
    • 1
  • Rehan Sadiq
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Engineering, Okanagan CampusThe University of British ColumbiaKelownaCanada

Personalised recommendations