Advertisement

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 14, Issue 4, pp 699–708 | Cite as

The policy impact on clean technology diffusion

  • Yi-Tui ChenEmail author
  • Dong-Shang Chang
  • Chia-Yon Chen
  • Chu-Chieh Chen
Original Paper

Abstract

We employ a logistic model to examine the impacts of environmental policy (emission standards and economic instruments) and plant characteristics on clean technology diffusion by using the amount of total suspended particulate (TSP), sulfur oxide (SO x ), and nitric oxide (NO x ) emissions in 14 power plants provided by Taiwan Power Company covering the period of 1989–2006. The concentration of the pollutants emitted to air from fossil-fired power plants is modeled as the performance of technology development. The objective of this study is to investigate the determinants of technology diffusion to help generate strategic insights on environmental policy. The results show that the environmental policy by regulating emission standard provides a negative effect on technology diffusion while the ‘mixed policy’ (an integration of environmental standards and economic instruments) has a significantly positive effect on technology diffusion for NO x but insignificantly for TSP and SO x .

Keywords

Logistic model Clean technology Technology diffusion Emission standard 

References

  1. Atuahene-Gima K (1992) Inward technology licensing as an alternative to internal R&D in new product development: a conceptual framework. J Prod Innov Manag 9(2):156–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandyopadhyay A (2011) Amine versus ammonia absorption of CO2 as a measure of reducing GHG emission: a critical analysis. Clean Technol Environ Policy 13:269–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Battisti G (2008) Innovations and the economics of new technology spreading within and across users: gaps and way forward. J Clean Prod 16(S1):22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown L (1981) Innovation diffusion. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  5. Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1994) Environmental policy reconsidered: the role of technological innovation. Eur Econ Rev 38(3–4):545–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cohen WM, Levinthal DA (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective of learning and innovation. Admin Sci Q 35(1):128–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Danaher T, Wu X, Campbell NA (2001) Bi-directional reflectance distribution function approaches to radiometric calibration of landsat TM imagery. In: Proceedings IGARSS 2001 conference, Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  8. Diederen P, van Tongeren F, van der Veen H (2003) Returns on investment in energy-saving technologies under energy price uncertainty in Dutch greenhouse horticulture. Environ Resour Econ 24(4):379–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eder P (2003) Expert inquiry on innovation options for cleaner production in the chemical industry. J Clean Prod 11(4):347–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elcock D, Gasper J, Moses DO, Emerson D, Aguero R (2000) Alternative future environmental regulatory approaches for petroleum refineries. Environ Sci Policy 3:219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elms RD, El-Halwagi MM (2010) The effect of greenhouse gas policy on the design and scheduling of biodiesel plants with multiple feedstocks. Clean Technol Environ Policy 12:547–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Granderson G (1999) The impact of regulation on technical change. South Econ J 65(4):807–822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hahn R, Stavins R (1992) Economic incentives for environmental protection: integrating theory and practice. Am Econ Rev 82:464–468Google Scholar
  14. Hammar H, Löfgren A (2010) Explaining adoption of end of pipe solutions and clean technologies—determinants of firms’ investments for reducing emissions to air in four sectors in Sweden. Energy Policy 38:3644–3651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu YC, Tseng FM (2009) Quadratic-interval bass model for new product sales diffusion. Expert Syst Appl 36:8496–8502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huhtala A (2003) Promoting financing of cleaner production investment UNEP experience. J Clean Prod 11(6):615–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Islam T, Meade N (2000) Modeling diffusion and replacement. Eur J Oper Res 125:551–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaffe A, Stavins R (1995) Dynamic incentives of environmental regulations: the effects of alternative policy instruments on technology diffusion. J Environ Econ Manag 29(3):S43–S63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaffe A, Newell R, Stavins R (2002) Environmental policy and technological change. Environ Resour Econ 22(1–2):41–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jung C, Krutilla K, Boyd R (1996) Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: an evaluation of policy alternatives. J Environ Econ Manag 30:95–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kamien M, Zang I (2000) Meet me halfway: research joint ventures and absorptive capacity. Int J Ind Organ 18(7):995–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kemp R (1995) Environmental policy and technical change. Datawyse, MaastrichtGoogle Scholar
  23. Kemp R, Volpi M (2008) The diffusion of clean technologies: a review with suggestions for future diffusion analysis. J Clean Prod 16:S14–S21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Klaus R, Andreas Z, Kathrin A, Esther H (2006) The influence of different characteristics of the EU environmental management and auditing scheme on technical environmental innovations and economic performance. Ecol Econ 57:45–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klemes JJ (2010) Environmental policy decision-making support tools and pollution reduction technologies: a summary. Clean Technol Environ Policy 12(6):587–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kline S (1995) The impact of public policy on the diffusion and implementation of EDI: an evaluation of the TEDIS programme. Inf Econ Policy 7:147–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krogh GV, Nonaka I, Aben M (2001) Making the most of your company’s knowledge: a strategic framework. Long Range Plan 34:421–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Langerak F, Peelen E, van der Veen M (1998) Exploratory results on the antecedents and consequences of green marketing. J Mark Res Soc 40(4):323–335Google Scholar
  29. Lee H, Smith K, Grimm C (2003) The effect of new product radicality and scope on the extent and speed of innovation diffusion. J Manage 29(5):753–768Google Scholar
  30. Luken R, van Rompaey F (2008) Drivers and barriers to environmentally sound technology adoption by manufacturing plants in developing countries. J Clean Prod 16(S1):67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lundvall B.-A. (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation. Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Madhavan R, Grover R (1998) From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. J Mark 62(4):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahajan V, Muller E (1996) Timing, diffusion of successive generations of a generations of technological innovations: the IBM mainframe case. Technol Forecast Soc Change 51:109–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Meyer PS (1994) Bi-logistic growth. Technol Forecast Soc Change 47(1):89–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyer PS, Ausbel JH (1999) Carrying capacity: a model with logistically varying limits. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 61(3):209–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mickwitz P, Hyvattinen H, Kivimaa P (2008). The role of policy instruments in the innovation and diffusion of environmentally friendlier technologies: popular claims versus case study experiences. J Clean Prod 16(1):S162–S170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Milliman S, Prince R (1989) Firm incentive to promote technological change in pollution control. J Environ Econ Manag 17(3):247–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Molina A (1997) Insights into the nature of technology diffusion and implementation: the perspective of sociotechnical alignment. Technovation 17:601–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Montalvo C (2006) What triggers change and innovation? Technovation 26:312–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Montalvo C (2008) General wisdom concerning the factors affecting the adoption of cleaner technologies: a survey 1990–2007. J Clean Prod 16(1):S7–S13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Montealegre R (1999) A case for more case study research in the implementation of information technology in less-developed countries. Inf Technol Dev 8(4):199–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mukherjee A, Mitchell W, Talbot FB (2000) The impact of new manufacturing requirements on production line productivity and quality at a focused factory. J Oper Manag 18(2):139–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mulder P, de Groot H, Hofkes M (2003) Explaining slow diffusion of energy saving technologies; a vintage model with returns to diversity and learning-by-using. Resour Energy Econ 25(1):105–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Niosi et al (1993) National systems of innovation: in search of a workable concept. Technol Soc 15:207–227Google Scholar
  45. Reijnders L (2003) Policies influencing cleaner production: the role of prices and regulation. J Clean Prod 11(3):333–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Santangelo GD (2000) Corporate strategic technological partnership in the European information and communications technology industry. Res Policy 29(9):1015–1031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sohn SY, Ahn BJ (2003) Multigeneration diffusion model for economic assessment of new technology. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 70:251–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stoneman P (2001) The economics of technical diffusion. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  49. Tan X (2010) Clean technology R&D and innovation in emerging countries—experience from China. Energy Policy 38:2916–2926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Veugelers R, Cassiman B (1999) Make and buy in innovation strategies: evidence from Belgian manufacturing firms. Res Policy 28(1):63–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Warren KA, Ortolano L, Rozelle S (1999) Pollution prevention incentives and responses in Chinese firms. Environ Impact Asses Rev 19:521–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Watanabe C, Asgari B (2004) Impacts of functionality development on dynamism between learning and diffusion of technology. Technovation 24:651–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhou Q, Huang GH, Chan CW (2004) Development of an intelligent decision support system for air pollution control at coal-fired power plants. Expert Systs Appl 26:335–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yi-Tui Chen
    • 1
    Email author
  • Dong-Shang Chang
    • 2
  • Chia-Yon Chen
    • 3
  • Chu-Chieh Chen
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Health Care ManagementNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesTaipeiTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationNational Central UniversityJhongli CityTaiwan, ROC
  3. 3.Department of Resources EngineeringNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan, ROC
  4. 4.Department of Health Care ManagementNational Taipei University of Nursing and Health SciencesTaipei CityTaiwan, ROC

Personalised recommendations