Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 13, Issue 1, pp 103–109 | Cite as

Impacts of energy efficiency standard on motor energy savings and emission reductions

  • R. Saidur
  • T. M. I. Mahlia
Original Paper


Electrical motors use about 30–80% of total industrial energy for some selected countries around the world. Experiences from other countries show that government intervention in the form of regulations such as mandatory and voluntary approaches can save huge amount of energy along with the reduction of emissions associated with energy savings. In this paper, use of high efficient motors to replace standard motors to save energy have been quantified and presented. Emission reductions associated with the energy savings have been estimated and presented as well. Based on estimation, it has been found that 15,111, 6507 and 4295 MWh of energy can be saved for 50, 75 and 100% motor loadings, respectively, for using high efficient motors. These savings will correspond to US$ 967,074, US$ 416,461 and US$ 274,892 savings for 50, 75 and 100 motor loadings, respectively, by replacing standard motors with high efficiency motors. It was also found that 7,562,070 kg of CO2, 45,266 kg of SO2, 21,326 kg of NO x and 4,599 kg of CO could be avoided by using energy efficient motors for 50% load. It was also found that payback period for implementing high efficient motors are in the range from 1.22 to 6.05, which is economically very viable for motor loadings of 50%.


High efficient motors Energy savings Emission reductions 


  1. Akbaba M (1999) Energy conservation by using energy efficient electric motors. Appl Energy 64(1–4):149–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Ghandoor A, Al-Hinti I, Jaber JO, Sawalha SA (2008) Electricity consumption and associated GHG emissions of the Jordanian industrial sector: empirical analysis and future projection. Energy Policy 36(1):258–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Mansour F, Merse S, Tomsic M (2003) Comparison of energy efficiency strategies in the industrial sector of Slovenia. Energy 28(5):421–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anon (2004) Variable speed driven pumps, best practice guide, automation instrumentation and control laboratory technology,, Accessed 31 Dec 2008
  5. APEC (2008) Electric motors—alignment of standards and best practice programmes within APEC, final reportGoogle Scholar
  6. Bouzidi F (2007) Energy savings on single-phase induction motors under light load conditions. MS thesis, University of Nevada Las Vegas, USAGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheek KF, Pillay P (1997) Impact of energy efficient motors in the petrochemical industry. Electr Power Syst Res 42(1):11–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christoffersen LB, Larsen A, Togeby M (2006) Empirical analysis of energy management in Danish industry. J Clean Prod 14(5):516–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. CLASP (2009) Collaborative labeling and appliance standards programs homepage,
  10. De Almeida AT, Ferreira FJTE, Busch JF, Angers P (2002) Comparative analysis of IEEE 112-B and IEC 34–2 efficiency testing standards using stray load losses in low-voltage three-phase, cage induction motors. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 38(2):608–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. De Almeida AT, Fonseca P, Bertoldi P (2003) Energy-efficient motor systems in the industrial and in the services sectors in the European Union: characterisation, potentials, barriers and policies. Energy 28(6):673–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Keulenaer H, Belmans R, Blaustein E, Chapman D, De Almeida A, De Wachter B, Radgen P (2004) Energy-efficient motor-driven systems. EU-sponsored programme. European Copper Institute, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  13. Garcia AGP, Szklo AS, Schaeffer R, McNeil MA (2007) Energy-efficiency standards for electric motors in Brazilian industry. Energy Policy 35(6):3424–3439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaya D, Yagmur EA, Yigit KS, Kilic FC, Eren AS, Celik C (2008) Energy efficiency in pumps. Energy Convers Manag 49(6):1662–1673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lu B (2006) Energy usage evaluation and condition monitoring for electric machines using wireless sensor networks. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. Lu W (2006b) Potential energy savings and environmental impact by implementing energy efficiency standard for household refrigerators in China. Energy Policy 34(13):1583–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lu W (2007) Potential energy savings and environmental impacts of energy efficiency standards for vapor compression central air conditioning units in China. Energy Policy 35(3):1709–1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mahlia TMI (2002) Emissions from electricity generation in Malaysia. Renew Energy 27(2):293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Choudhury IA (2002) Potential electricity savings by implementing energy labels for room air conditioner in Malaysia. Energy Convers Manag 43(16):2225–2233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mahlia TMI, Masjuki HH, Saidur R, Amalina MA (2004) Cost-benefit analysis of implementing minimum energy efficiency standards for household refrigerator-freezers in Malaysia. Energy Policy 32(16):1819–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mecrow BC, Jack AG (2008) Efficiency trends in electric machines and drives. Energy Policy 36(12):4336–4341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nadel S, Elliott RN, Shepard M, Greenberg S, Katz G, De Almeida AT (2002) Energy-efficient motor systems: a handbook on technology, program, and policy opportunities, 2nd edn. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  23. Nesbitt L (2008) The impact of industry characteristics on the diffusion of adjustable speed motors across manufacturing industries. MA thesis, University of Denver, USAGoogle Scholar
  24. Onut S, Soner S (2007) Analysis of energy use and efficiency in Turkish manufacturing sector SMEs. Energy Convers Manag 48(2):384–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ozturk HK (2005) Energy usage and cost in the textile industry: a case study for Turkey. Energy 30(13):2424–2446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Prakash V, Baskar S, Sivakumar S, Sri Krishna K (2008) A novel efficiency improvement measure in three-phase induction motors, its conservation potential and economic analysis. Energ Sustain Dev 12(2):78–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Saidur R, Rahim NA, Ping HW, Jahirul MI, Mekhilef S, Masjuki HH (2009a) Energy and emission analysis for industrial motors in Malaysia. Energy Policy 37(9):3650–3658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Saidur R, Rahim NA, Masjuki HH, Mekhilef S, Ping HW, Jamaluddin MF (2009b) End-use energy analysis in the Malaysian industrial sector. Energy 34(2):153–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sterling CA (1996) Prevalence of components necessary for electrical demand side management savings persistence in the Albertan Industrial market sector. MS thesis, University of Alberta, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  30. Subrahmanya MHB (2006) Labour productivity, energy intensity and economic performance in small enterprises: a study of brick enterprises cluster in India. Energy Convers Manag 47(6):763–777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Tolvanen J (2008a) Saving energy with variable speed drives. World Pumps 32–33Google Scholar
  32. Tolvanen J (2008b) LCC approach for big motor-driven systems savings. World Pumps 24–27Google Scholar
  33. Wiel S, McMahon JE (2005) Energy-efficiency labels and standards: a guidebook for appliances, equipment, and lighting, 2nd ed. 10/05/2005
  34. Yanti PAA, Mahlia TMI (2009) Considerations for the selection of an applicable energy efficiency test procedure for electric motors in Malaysia: lessons for other developing countries. Energy Policy 37(9):3467–3474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yuejin Z (2007) General situation of energy conservation standards for china’s motor system. Energy Efficiency in Motor Driven Systems EEMODS 2007 to be held in Beijing, China, from June 10–13Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations