Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 167–174 | Cite as

Sustainability and recycle–reuse in process systems

Perspective
First Online:

Abstract

We have only one planet in which to live. Because of accelerating use of limited natural resources, its attendant environmental degradation, and societal inequity that has resulted among groups of people as well as that which will result between present and future generations, we generally recognize that the current development patterns are not sustainable for the long term. This realization calls for satisfying our needs by judiciously using renewable resources, recycling wastes and end-of-life products for beneficial uses, and reversing environmental degradation in some areas and minimizing environmental impacts in others. As new scientific and technological innovations are exploited to implement these goals, tools and methods are needed to ascertain that the direction of economic development for meeting increasing standard of living is protective of human life and ecology. Countries that are economically developed, and therefore wealthy, are in a better position to protect the environment than are the developing countries. This situation calls for technologies that are not only benign but also affordable for the developing world. This is the grand challenge of this century. Some ideas on the elements of this grand challenge that are relevant to the practice of chemistry and engineering are discussed here.

Keywords

Industrial sustainability Sustainability metrics Tools for sustainability Recycle–reuse 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Azapagic A, Perdan S (2000) Indicators of sustainable development for industry: a general framework. Trans Inst Chem Eng 78B:244Google Scholar
  2. Bell S, Morse S (2003) Measuring sustainability. Earthscan, London, p 55Google Scholar
  3. Bhattacharya D, Hestekin JA, Brushaber P, Cullen L, Bachas LG, Sikdar SK (1998) Novel poly-glutamic acid functionalized microfiltration membranes for sorption of heavy metals at high capacity. J Memb Sci 141:121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cabezas H, Bare J, Mallick SK (1998) Pollution prevention with chemical process simulators: the generalized waste reduction (WAR) algorithm. Comp Chem Eng 23:625Google Scholar
  5. Chemical Manufacturers’ Association or CMA, renamed American Chemistry Council or ACC (1998) Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. Clift R, Azapagic A (1998) The application of life cycle assessment to process selection, and design, NATO science series, environmental security, vol 62. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 69Google Scholar
  7. Curran MA (1996) (ed) Environmental life cycle analysis. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Diwekar U (1999) Process design for environmental problems, in tools and methods for pollution prevention. In: Sikdar SK, Diewkar U (eds) NATO science series, environmental security, vol 62. Kluwer, Dordrecht, p 277Google Scholar
  9. El-Halwagi MM (1997) Pollution prevention through process integration. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  10. El-Halwagi MM, Manousiothakis V (1989) Synthesis of mass exchange networks. AIChE J 35(8):1223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Harper PM, Gani R (2001) Computer-aided tools for design/selection of environmentally friendly substances. In: Sikdar SK, El-Halwagi M (eds) Process design tools for the environment. Taylor and Francis, New York, p 371Google Scholar
  12. Hilaly AK, Sikdar SK (1994) Pollution balance: a new method for minimizing waste production in manufacturing processes. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 44:1303Google Scholar
  13. Hopper JR, Saleh JM, Pike R (2001) Design of multi-phase and catalytic chemical reactors: a simulation tool for pollution prevention. Clean Prod Process 3(2):92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huber P, Mills M (2005) The bottomless well. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Kokoszka LC, Flood JW (1989) Environmental management handbook. Marcel Dekker, New York, p 30Google Scholar
  16. Lems S, van der Kooi HJ, de Swaan Arons J (2002) The sustainability of resource utilization. Green Chem 4:308–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Our Common Future (1987) WCED. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  18. Sikdar SK (2003a) Sustainable development and sustainability metrics. AIChE J 49(8):1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sikdar SK (2003b) Journey towards sustainable development: a role for chemical engineers. Env Progress 22(4):227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sikdar SK, Diwekar U (1999) (Eds) Tools for Pollution Prevention, NATO Science Series, environmental security, vol 62. Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  21. Sikdar SK, El-Halwagi M (2001) Process design tools for the environment. Taylor and Francis, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Stewart M, Petrie J (1999) Planning for waste management and disposal in minerals processing using life cycle assessment. Miner Energy Raw Mater Rep 14(3)Google Scholar
  24. Wenzel H, Alting L, Hauchild MZ (2000) Environmental assessment of products, vol 1. Springer, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhao R, Cabezas H, Nishtala S (2001) Computer-aided solvent design for the environment. In: Sikdar SK, El-Halwagi M (eds) Process design tools for the environment. p 431Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Risk Management Research LaboratoryUnited States Environmental Protection AgencyCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations