Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 125–132

Inflatable ‘Evergreen’ dome settlements for Earth’s Polar Regions

Original Paper

Abstract

Sustaining human life in the Earth’s Polar Regions is very difficult especially during wintertime when low air temperature, strong wind and “whiteouts” make normal existence dangerous. To counter these environmental stresses, the authors offer the innovative artificial “Evergreen” dome, an inflated hemisphere with interiors continuously providing a Mediterranean Sea-like climate. The “Evergreen” dome theory is developed, substantiated by computations that show it is possible for current technology to construct and heat large enclosed volumes inexpensively. Specifically, a satisfactory result is reached by using sunlight reflectors and a special double thin film, which concentrates solar energy inside the dome while, at the same time markedly decreasing the heat loss to exterior Polar Region air. Someday, a similar design may be employed at settlements on the Moon and Mars.

Keywords

Artificial biosphere Inflatable film building Polar region houses Solar energy concentrator 

References

  1. Albright LD (2001) Environmental control for plants on Earth and in space. IEEE Control Syst Mag 21:28–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolonkin AA (2003) Optimal inflatable space towers with 3–100 km height. J Br Interplanet Soc 56:87–97Google Scholar
  3. Bolonkin AA, Cathcart RB (2006) A cable space transportation system at the Earth’s poles to support exploitation of the Moon. J Br Interplanet Soc 59:375–380Google Scholar
  4. Floren DW (2001) Antarctic mining regimes: an appreciation of the attainable. J Environ Law Litig 16:467Google Scholar
  5. Fyfe JC, Saenko OA (2005) Human-induced change in the Antarctic circumpolar current. J Clim 18:3068–3073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hall RE, Jones CI (1999) Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others? Q J Econ 114:83–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamer M (2006) The polar road to riches. New Sci 189:24–25Google Scholar
  8. Hix J (1974) The glass house. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 192–196Google Scholar
  9. Hornig JF (ed) (1999) Social and environmental impacts of the James Bay Hydroelectric Project. McGill-Queens University Press, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  10. Keating WR, Donaldson GC (2004) The impact of global warming on health and mortality. South Med J 97:1093–1099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Klein S, Halzen F (2005) The ice cube at the end of the world, CERN Courier, pp 17–22Google Scholar
  12. Koch K-M (ed) (2004) Membrane structures: innovative building with film and fabric. Prestel, NYGoogle Scholar
  13. McQuaid M (ed) (2005) Extreme textiles: designing for high performance. Princeton Architectural Press, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. Naschekin VV (1969) Technical thermodynamic and heat transmission. Public House High University, Moscow (in Russian)Google Scholar
  15. Overpeck JT et al (2005) Arctic system on trajectory to new, seasonally ice-free state. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 34:309, 312–313Google Scholar
  16. Talley I (2006) Arctic Harshness Hinders search for oil. Wall St J CCXLVIII: A10Google Scholar
  17. Zhou S, Flynn PC (2005) Geoengineering downwelling ocean currents: a cost assessment. Clim Change 71:203–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.BrooklynUSA
  2. 2.BurbankUSA

Personalised recommendations