Advertisement

Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 252–258 | Cite as

Ethical motivations for green business and engineering

  • Jamie R. Hendry
  • P. Aarne Vesilind
Original paper

Abstract

Corporate references to “sustainability” and the operative process of “green business” have become almost commonplace over the past decade. Companies not only seek to comply with environmental regulations, but many have discovered that techniques for reducing adverse environmental impact often have positive effects on corporate profitability as well. Such adoptions of green business and engineering practices are morally neutral because the driving forces behind them are legal and economic, but not ethical. In some instances, however, managers and engineers have undertaken green business initiatives with the notion of doing something positive for future humans and for the natural environment. In this paper we discuss the “green” driving forces behind moral decisions regarding the adoption of green engineering and business practices and conclude that most “green engineering” known to the public is simply good business practice. Only when engineering and business begin the “green engineering” program with the aim of reducing adverse impact on health or environment does “green engineering” become morally admirable.

Keywords

Moral Judgment International Standard Organization Green Engineering Forest Stewardship Council Financial Concern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson RC (1998) Mid-course correction – toward a sustainable enterprise: the interface model. The Peregrinzilla Press, AtlantaGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews RNL (1999) Managing the environment, managing ourselves: a history of American environmental policy. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  3. Barlett DL, Steele JB (2003) The great energy scam. TIME 162(15):60–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Billatos SB, Basaly NA (1997) Green technology and design for the environment. Taylor & Francis, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Coalition for Environmentally Responsible Economies (CERES) (n.d.) website. Retrieved January 3, 2004 from http://www.ceres.org
  6. Colby A, Kohlberg L, Gibbs JT, Lieberman A (1983) A longitudinal study of moral judgment. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev 200:46 Google Scholar
  7. Duska R, Whelan M (1975) Moral development: a guide to Piaget and Kohlberg. Paulist Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Faust J (2004) “Earth Liberation Who?” Retrieved January 3, 2004 from the ABCNEWS.com website: http://more.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/elf981022.html
  9. Fowler D (2003) “Bush administration, environmentalists battle over ‘New Source Review’ air rules, group against smog and pollution hotline, fall. Retrieved January 3, 2004 from http://www.gasp-pgh.org/hotline/fall03_4.html
  10. Friedman M (1962) Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 133Google Scholar
  11. Gibney K (2003) “Sustainable development: a new way of doing business,” prism. American Society of Engineering Education, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  12. Global reporting initiative (n.d.) website. Retrieved January 3, 2004 from http://www.globalreporting.org
  13. Hawken P (1994) The ecology of commerce: a declaration of sustainability. Harper Business, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Hendry JR (2000) Sustainability through unlikely partnerships: the coalition for environmentally responsible economies hopes to make business more accountable. Safety + Health 161(11): 43–48Google Scholar
  15. Hosmer LT (2003) Herman Miller and the protection of the environment: the ethics of management. McGraw-Hill Irwin, BostonGoogle Scholar
  16. International Standards Organization website (n.d.). Retrieved January 3, 2004 from http://www.iso.org.
  17. Jesitus J (2000) Charter promotes environmental responsibility in ski areas. Hotel Motel Manage 215(19):64Google Scholar
  18. Kohlberg L (1981) The Philosophy of moral development, vol 1. Harper & Row, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  19. Kraft ME, Vig NJ (2000) Environmental policy from the 1970s to 2000: an overview. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME (eds) Environmental policy: new directions for the Twenty-first century, 4th edn. CQ Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawrence AT, Morell D (1995) Leading-edge environmental management: Motivation, opportunity, resources and processes. In: Post JE, Collins D, Starik M (eds) Research in corporate social performance and policy, Supplement 1, JAI Press, GreenwichGoogle Scholar
  21. Lazaroff C (1999) “U.S. Government Sues Power Plants to Clear Dirty Air,” Environment News Service. http://ens.lycos.com/ens/nov99/1999L-11-03-06.html
  22. Lovins AB, Lovins LH, Hawken P (1999) A road map for natural capitalism. Harv Bus Rev 7(3):145–158Google Scholar
  23. National Ski Areas Association (2002a) Environmental Charter, http://www.nsaa.org/nsaa2002/_environmental_charter.asp
  24. National Ski Areas Association (2002b), Sustainable Slopes Annual Report, http://www.nsaa.org/nsaa2002/_environmental_charter.asp?mode=ss
  25. Piaget J (1965) The moral judgment of the child. The Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. PricewaterhouseCoopers (2002) Sustainability Survey Report, New York, AugustGoogle Scholar
  27. Rest JR (1986) Moral development: advances in research and theory. Praeger, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  28. Rest JR, Narvaez D, Bebeau MJ, Thoma SJ (1999) Postconventional moral thinking: a neo-Kohlbergian approach. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  29. Robért K-H (1991) “Educating a nation: The natural step,” In Context, no. 28, SpringGoogle Scholar
  30. Sethi SP (1975) Dimensions of corporate social performance: an analytical framework. Calif Manage Rev 17(3):58–64Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bucknell UniversityLewisburgUSA

Personalised recommendations