Sociodemographic and clinical factors associated with acceptance of outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy in a Singapore tertiary hospital from 2014 to 2017
- 31 Downloads
Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) can facilitate early discharge; however, not all offered OPAT can accept. We assessed factors associated with acceptance of OPAT in a large Asian tertiary hospital cohort. From 2014 to 2017, we reviewed all referrals to Singapore General Hospital’s (SGH) Outpatient Parenteral Antibiotic Therapy (OPAT) service. We compared differences in sociodemographic and clinical factors between patients who opted for OPAT and those who declined, using chi-square test for univariate analysis and logistic regression for multivariate analysis. From 2014 to 2017, a total of 1406 OPAT referrals were made. Of these, 95.9% (1349/1406) were deemed suitable for OPAT. Amongst those suitable, 90.0% (1213/1349) accepted OPAT treatment. On multivariate analysis, being independently ambulant (aOR = 3.46, 95%CI = 2.21–5.37) was independently associated with higher odds of acceptance for OPAT; whereas, patients with peripheral vascular disease had lower odds of accepting OPAT (aOR = 0.32, 95%CI = 0.16–0.62). Lower socioeconomic status (SES) was closely associated with rejection of OPAT, with markers of both individual-level SES (subsidized ward class) and area-level SES (staying in a public rental flat) being independently associated with lower odds of OPAT preference. Distance and travel time were not associated with OPAT acceptance. The top reasons for rejecting OPAT were lack of caregiver (n = 35), mobility issues (n = 24), financial issues (n = 24), and difficulty caring for the line (n = 21). Comorbidities, mobility, and financial issues are important factors to consider when determining suitability for OPAT. More can be done to improve accessibility of OPAT amongst lower-income patients and those staying in lower-SES areas.
KeywordsOutpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy Socioeconomic Acceptability
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
This study involved human participants and was approved by the Singhealth Institutional Review Board (IRB) (approval number: CIRB 2014/151/F). Approval for retrospective analysis of patient data was obtained from the Singhealth IRB.
Waiver of informed consent for retrospective analysis of patient data was obtained from the Singhealth IRB.
- 6.Fisher D, Michaels J, Hase R, Zhang J, Kataria S, Sim B et al (2017) Outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) in Asia: missing an opportunity. J Antimicrob Chemother 72(4):1221–1226Google Scholar
- 7.Fisher D (2017) OPAT in Asia. Int J Antimicrob Agents 50(S2):10–28Google Scholar
- 14.Matthews P, Conlon C, Berendt A, Kayley J, Jefferies L, Atkins B et al (2007) Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT): is it safe for selected patients to self-administer at home? A retrospective analysis of a large cohort over 13 years. J Antimicrob Chemother 60(2):356–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Lim M (2005) Transforming Singapore health care: public-private partnership. Ann Acad Med Singap 34(7):461–467Google Scholar
- 17.Ministry of Health S. Medisave Withdrawal Limits Singapore: Government of Singapore; 2017 [Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/costs_and_financing/schemes_subsidies/medisave/Withdrawal_Limits.html
- 20.OneMap. OneMap Singapore: Introduction Singapore: OneMap Singapore; 2017 [Available from: https://docs.onemap.sg/#introduction
- 25.Mirón-Rubio M, González-Ramallo V, Estrada-Cuxart O, Sanroma-Mendizábal P, Segado-Soriano A, Mujal-Martínez A et al (2016) Intravenous antimicrobial therapy in the hospital-at-home setting: data from the Spanish outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy registry. Future Microbiol 11(3):375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Low L, Vasanwala F, Ng L, Chen C, Lee K, Tan S (2015) Effectiveness of a transitional home care program in reducing acute hospital utilization: a quasi-experimental study. BMC Health Serv Res 15(100)Google Scholar
- 28.Department of Statistics Singapore. Home Ownership Rate of Resident Households 2015 [updated 2015. Available from: http://www.singstat.gov.sg/statistics/visualising-data/charts/home-ownership-rate-of-resident-households
- 29.Housing & Development Board Singapore. Rents & Deposits 2013 [updated 15 May 2013. Available from: http://www.hdb.gov.sg/fi10/fi10323p.nsf/w/RentDirectHDBRentDeposit?OpenDocument
- 32.Ministry of Health S. Extending the use of Medisave. Singapore.: Government of Singapore. 2002 [Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/pressRoomItemRelease/2002/extending_the_use_of_medisave.html
- 33.Ministry of Health S. Healthcare cost inflation Singapore: Government of Singapore. 2018 [Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/Parliamentary_QA/2018/healthcare-cost-inflation-.html
- 34.Ministry of Health S. Medisave uses and withdrawa. 2017Google Scholar
- 35.Lim A. New Flexi-Medisave scheme: what it can and cannot be used for. Straits Times. 2015 Jan 12th 2015Google Scholar
- 39.Madaline T, Nori P, Mowrey W, Zukowski E, Gohil S, Sarwar U et al (2017) Bundle in the Bronx: impact of a transition-of-care outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy bundle on all-cause 30-day hospital readmissions. Open Forum Infect Dis 4(2) ofx097Google Scholar