Laboratory automation reduces time to report of positive blood cultures and improves management of patients with bloodstream infection
The impact on time to results (TTR) and clinical decisions was evaluated for mono-microbial positive blood cultures (BC) processed using the BD Kiestra Work Cell Automation (WCA) system. Positive BC were processed by the WCA system by full-automatic subculture on solid media and digital imaging after 8 h of incubation (8-h method) followed by identification (ID) and antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). To evaluate the accuracy of the 8-h method, ID and AST from 8-h and overnight incubated colonies were compared for the same organisms. To evaluate its clinical impact, results from 102 BC processed by the 8-h method (cases) were compared with those from 100 BC processed by overnight incubation method (controls) in a comparable period. Identification after 8-h and overnight incubation gave concordant results in 101/102 (99.0%) isolates. Among a total of 1379 microorganism-antimicrobial combinations, categorical agreement was 99.4% (1371/1379); no very major error, 7 major errors, and one minor error were observed. TTR in cases (32.8 h ± 8.3 h) was significantly (p < 0.001) shorter than in controls (55.4 h ± 13.3 h). A significant reduction was observed for duration of empirical therapy (cases 54.8 h ± 23.3 h vs controls 86.9 h ± 34.1 h, p < 0.001) and 30-day crude mortality rate (cases 16.7% vs controls 29.0%, p < 0.037). Automation and 8-h digital reading of plates from positive BC, followed by ID and AST, greatly reduce TTR and shorten the duration of antimicrobial empiric therapy, possibly improving outcome in patients with mono-microbial bloodstream infections.
KeywordsLaboratory automation Blood culture Time to report BD Kiestra Bloodstream infections
time to report
antimicrobial susceptibility testing
The authors thank Dr. Amedeo Moretti and Dr. Enrico Ciurnella for technical assistance in antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
- 1.Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, Bellomo R, Bernard GR, Chiche JD, Coopersmith CM, Hotchkiss RS, Levy MM, Marshall JC, Martin GS, Opal SM, Rubenfeld GD, van der Poll T, Vincent JL, Angus DC (2016) The third international consensus definitions for Sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Descours G, Desmurs L, Hoang TLT, Ibranosyan M, Baume M, Ranc AG, Fuhrmann C, Dauwalder O, Salka W, Vandenesch F (2018) Evaluation of the accelerate Pheno™ system for rapid identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacteria in bloodstream infections. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3287-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mauri C, Principe L, Bracco S, Meroni E, Corbo N, Pini B, Luzzaro F (2017) Identification by mass spectrometry and automated susceptibility testing from positive bottles: a simple, rapid, and standardized approach to reduce the turnaround time in the management of blood cultures. BMC Infect Dis 17(1):749. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-017-2851-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 16.Burckhardt I, Horner S, Burckhardt F, Zimmermann S (2018) Detection of MRSA in nasal swabs-marked reduction of time to report for negative reports by substituting classical manual workflow with total lab automation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-018-3308-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.EUCAST (2016) EUCAST clinical breakpoints v6. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_6.0_Breakpoint_table.pdf, accessed 31 August 2018
- 19.EUCAST (2017) EUCAST clinical breakpoints v.7. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_7.1_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf, accessed 31 August 2018
- 20.EUCAST (2018) EUCAST clinical breakpoints v.8. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_8.0_Breakpoint_Tables.pdf, accessed 31 august 2018
- 21.Buehler SS, Madison B, Snyder SR, Derzon JH, Cornish NE, Saubolle MA, Weissfeld AS, Weinstein MP, Liebow EB, Wolk DM (2016) Effectiveness of practices to increase timeliness of providing targeted therapy for inpatients with bloodstream infections: a laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Microbiol Rev 29(1):59–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Tabak YP, Vankeepuram L, Ye G, Jeffers K, Gupta V, Murray PR (2018) Blood Culture Turnaround Time in US Acute Care Hospitals and Implications for Laboratory Process Optimization. J Clin Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.00500-18
- 32.Rello J, van Engelen TSR, Alp E, Calandra T, Cattoir V, Kern WV, Netea MG, Nseir S, Opal SM, van de Veerdonk FL, Wilcox MH, Wiersinga WJ (2018) Towards precision medicine in Sepsis: a position paper from the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Clin Microbial Infect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.03.011