Advertisement

O-antigen serotyping and MALDI-TOF, potentially useful tools for optimizing semi-empiric antipseudomonal treatments through the early detection of high-risk clones

  • Xavier MuletEmail author
  • Rafaela García
  • María Gayá
  • Antonio Oliver
Original Article

Abstract

The increasing prevalence of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections is due to the global spread of defined high-risk clones (HRC). Among them, ST175 is particularly frequent in Spain and France. Here, we evaluated O-antigen serotyping and MALDI-TOF as typing methods for the early identification of ST175. O-antigen (O4) serotyping and MALDI-TOF biomarker peak-based recognition models were tested in several strain collections, including 206 non-duplicated P. aeruginosa clinical isolates collected in 2016. Resistance profiles were determined by broth microdilution and clonal epidemiology by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and multilocus sequence typing (MLST). Up to 24.3% of the isolates were XDR and 28.2% non-susceptible to meropenem, while resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam (2.9%) and colistin (0.5%) was infrequent. Half of all XDR isolates belonged to ST175 and most of them were only susceptible to ceftolozane/tazobactam and colistin. A model based on the detection of one MALDI-TOF biomarker peak yielded negative and positive predicted values (NPV/PPV) for the detection of ST175 of 100%/51.9%, whereas NPV/PPV for a model based on two biomarker peaks were 99.4%/87.1% and for O4 serotyping, 99.4%/84.1%. Both, O4 serotyping and MALDI-TOF biomarker peak analysis, proved to be sensitive and specific methods that could be easily incorporated in the routine workflow for the early detection of ST175 HCR. Since ST175 is associated with defined XDR profiles, with most isolates only being susceptible to colistin and ceftolozane/tazobactam, these simple techniques could be useful for optimizing semi-empiric antipseudomonal treatments in areas where this HRC is prevalent.

Keywords

Pseudomonas aeruginosa High-risk clones Antibiotic resistance Ceftolozane-tazobactam ST175 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Álvaro Gómez for his advice during the establishment of the MALDI-TOF spectra analysis protocols.

Funding information

This work was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of Spain, Instituto de Salud Carlos III—co-financed by European Regional Development Fund “A way to achieve Europe” ERDF, through the Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (RD12/0015 and RD16/0016) and grants PI15/00088 and PI18/00076.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Juan C, Peña C, Oliver A (2017 Feb 15) Host and pathogen biomarkers for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections. J Infect Dis 215(suppl_1):S44–S51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oliver A, Mulet X, López-Causapé C, Juan C (2015) The increasing threat of Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Drug resist Updat 21-22:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Del Barrio-Tofiño E, López-Causapé C, Cabot G, Rivera A, Benito N, Segura C et al (2017) Genomics and susceptibility profiles of extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61(11):24Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cholley P, Thouverez M, Hocquet D, van der Mee-Marquet N, Talon D, Bertrand X. Most multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from hospitals in eastern France belong to a few clonal types. J Clin Microbiol 2011 Jul;49(7):2578–2583Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cabot G, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Domínguez MA, Gago JF, Juan C, Tubau F, Rodríguez C, et al; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). Genetic markers of widespread extensively drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012;56(12):6349–6357Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cabot G, López-Causapé C, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Sommer LM, Domínguez MÁ, Zamorano L et al (2016) Deciphering the resistome of the widespread Pseudomonas aeruginosa sequence type 175 international high-risk clone through whole-genome sequencing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60(12):7415–7423Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mulet X, Cabot G, Ocampo-Sosa AA, Domínguez MA, Zamorano L, Juan C, Tubau F et al; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). Biological markers of Pseudomonas aeruginosa epidemic high-risk clones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2013;57(11):5527–5535Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Magiorakos AP, Srinivasan A, Carey RB, Carmeli Y, Falagas ME, Giske CG et al (2012) Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 18(3):268–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mikucionyte G, Zamorano L, Vitkauskiene A, López-Causapé C, Juan C, Mulet X, Oliver A (2016) Nosocomial dissemination of VIM-2-producing ST235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Lithuania. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 35:195–200.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2529-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kaufmann ME (1998) Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Methods Mol Med 15:33–50Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tenover FC, Arbeit RD, Goering RV, Mickelsen PA, Murray BE, Persing DH et al (1995) Interpreting chromosomal DNA restriction patterns produced by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: criteria for bacterial strain typing. J Clin Microbiol 33(9):2233–2239Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Curran B, Jonas D, Grundmann H, Pitt T, Dowson CG (2004) Development of a multilocus sequence typing scheme for the opportunistic pathogen Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Clin Microbiol 42(12):5644–5649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cabrolier N, Sauget M, Bertrand X, Hocquet D (2015) Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry identifies Pseudomonas aeruginosa high-risk clones. J Clin Microbiol 53(4):1395–1398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peña C, Cabot G, Gómez-Zorrilla S, Zamorano L, Ocampo-Sosa A, Murillas J, et al; Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). Influence of virulence genotype and resistance profile in the mortality of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infections. Clin Infect Dis 2015;60(4):539–548Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sauget M, Valot B, Bertrand X, Hocquet D (2017) Can MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry reasonably type Bacteria? Trends Microbiol 25(6):447–455CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xavier Mulet
    • 1
    Email author
  • Rafaela García
    • 1
  • María Gayá
    • 1
  • Antonio Oliver
    • 1
  1. 1.Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Son EspasesInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Illes Balears (IdISBa)Palma de MallorcaSpain

Personalised recommendations