How is post-mortem microbiology appraised by pathologists? Results from a practice survey conducted by ESGFOR

  • V. Saegeman
  • M. C. Cohen
  • J. Alberola
  • N. Ziyade
  • C. Farina
  • ESCMID Study Group for Forensic and Postmortem Microbiology
  • G. Cornaglia
  • A. Fernández-Rodríguez
Original Article

Abstract

Post-mortem microbiology (PMM) is an important tool in forensic pathology, assisting to determine the cause and manner of death. However, there is a lack of standardisation of PMM sampling. In order to get a better insight into the methods used, the available technical options and developmental needs, ESCMID Study Group for Forensic and Postmortem Microbiology (ESGFOR) members designed a survey aimed at pathologists regarding common practices of PMM in clinical and forensic autopsies. Multiple choice questions were developed based on Cumulative Techniques and Procedures in Clinical Microbiology (Cumitech). The questionnaire was sent to pathologists mainly across Europe and Turkey using SurveyMonkey. The survey had 147 respondents. Although all pathologists were aware of the existence of PMM, 39% (19/49) of the participants were not using it. The three main indications for PMM were: (i) clinical suspicion of an infection not confirmed antemortem (83%), (ii) infectious signs at autopsy (83%) and (iii) as part of a standard protocol for foetal/perinatal or paediatric death (67%). Almost 80% of the participants using PMM stated taking 1–10 samples per case. Of the requested examinations, a general bacteriological culture (96%) and a specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for a particular infectious agent (34%) were most popular. The most frequent samples were: heart blood (66%), peripheral femoral blood (49%), spleen (64%) and lung (56%). Eighty-nine percent of the participants considered PMM a useful resource when investigating the cause of death. Although there are some common uses, this survey indicates that there is a need for improvement towards standardising sampling procedures in PMM.

Supplementary material

10096_2017_2943_MOESM1_ESM.docx (787 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 786 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Caplan MJ, Koontz FP (2001) Cumitech 35, postmortem microbiology. Coordinating editor: BW McCurdy. ASM Press, Washington D.C.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Roberts FJ (1998) Procurement, interpretation, and value of postmortem cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 17:821–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nolte KB, Fischer M, Reagan S, Lynfield R; Members of the National Association of Medical Examiners (NAME) Ad Hoc Committee for Bioterrorism and Infectious Diseases (2010) Guidelines to implement medical examiner/coroner-based surveillance for fatal infectious diseases and bioterrorism (“Med-X”). Am J Forensic Med Pathol 31:308–312CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Prtak L, Al-Adnani M, Fenton P, Kudesia G, Cohen MC (2010) Contribution of bacteriology and virology in sudden unexpected death in infancy. Arch Dis Child 95:371–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fernández-Rodríguez A, Alberola J, Cohen MC (2013) Análisis microbiológico post mórtem. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin 31:685–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rambaud C, Roux AL, Saegeman V (2012) Microbiological examination of post-mortem samples. In: ESCMID-SFM Manual of microbiology, 1st edn, pp 255–261Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Morris JA, Harrison LM, Partridge SM (2007) Practical and theoretical aspects of postmortem bacteriology. Curr Diagn Pathol 13:65–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fernández-Rodríguez A, Cohen MC, Lucena J, Van de Voorde W, Angelini A, Ziyade N, Saegeman V (2015) How to optimise the yield of forensic and clinical post-mortem microbiology with an adequate sampling: a proposal for standardisation. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34(5):1045–1057. doi:10.1007/s10096-015-2317-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weber MA, Ashworth MT, Risdon RA, Hartley JC, Malone M, Sebire NJ (2008) The role of post-mortem investigations in determining the cause of sudden unexpected death in infancy. Arch Dis Child 93:1048–1053CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morentin B, Suárez-Mier MP, Aguilera B, Arrieta J, Audicana C, Fernández-Rodríguez A (2012) Clinicopathological features of sudden unexpected infectious death: population-based study in children and young adults. Forensic Sci Int 220:80–84CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. Saegeman
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. C. Cohen
    • 3
  • J. Alberola
    • 4
  • N. Ziyade
    • 5
  • C. Farina
    • 6
  • ESCMID Study Group for Forensic and Postmortem Microbiology
  • G. Cornaglia
    • 7
  • A. Fernández-Rodríguez
    • 8
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and ImmunologyK.U. LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Laboratory MedicineUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  3. 3.Histopathology DepartmentSheffield Children’s NHS Foundation TrustSheffieldUK
  4. 4.Microbiology ServiceUniversity Hospital Dr. Peset Valencia, School of Medicine, University of ValenciaValenciaSpain
  5. 5.Postmortem Mikrobiyoloji LaboratuvarıAdalet Bakanlığı Adli Tıp KurumuBahçelievler/İstanbulTurkey
  6. 6.Microbiology InstituteASST Papa Giovanni XXIIIBergamoItaly
  7. 7.Department of Diagnostics and Public HealthUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  8. 8.Microbiology Laboratory, Biology DepartmentInstituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias ForensesMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations