Circulating galectin-3 in infections and non-infectious inflammatory diseases
- 613 Downloads
Recent studies point to a dual role for galectin-3 as both a circulating damage-associated molecular pattern and a cell membrane-associated pattern recognition receptor. The aim of this study was to assess the potential of circulating galectin-3 for discriminating between infections and non-infectious inflammatory disorders on the one hand, and between fungal and bacterial infections on the other. Galectin-3 and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured in the plasma of 127 patients with either non-infectious inflammatory disorders (gout, autoinflammatory syndrome or pancreatitis) or an infection (viral lower respiratory tract infection, bacterial sepsis or candidaemia). Circulating galectin-3 concentrations were increased in patients with infections when compared with healthy volunteers or patients with non-infectious inflammatory diseases. At cut-off values with a specificity of 95 %, the sensitivity of galectin-3 (>20.6 ng/ml) to discriminate between an infection and non-infectious inflammation was higher than that of CRP (>156 mg/l): 43 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) 33–53 %] versus 27 % (95 % CI 19–37 %), p = 0.03. After exclusion of patients with CRP <156 mg/l, galectin-3 concentration >20.6 ng/ml could identify 41 % (95 % CI 29–53 %) of the patients with an infection at the cost of one false-positive with non-infectious inflammation. Using this sequential approach, 57 % of the patients with an infection could be selected. Galectin-3 concentrations were similar in patients with bacterial and Candida sepsis, while being lower in viral respiratory infections. Although galectin-3 does not discriminate between bacterial and Candida sepsis, the sequential use of CRP and galectin-3 in distinguishing infectious diseases from non-infectious inflammation may be superior to CRP alone.
KeywordsGout Invasive Candidiasis Bacterial Sepsis Autoinflammatory Syndrome Candida Sepsis
This study was partly supported by an unrestricted research grant of Institut Mérieux. J.t.O. was supported by the European Regional Development Fund—province of Gelderland project number 2009-010034. M.G.N. was supported by a European Research Council grant (#310372).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 2.Sato S, St-Pierre C, Bhaumik P, Nieminen J (2009) Galectins in innate immunity: dual functions of host soluble beta-galactoside-binding lectins as damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) and as receptors for pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Immunol Rev 230(1):172–187. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2009.00790.x PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Jouault T, El Abed-El Behi M, Martínez-Esparza M, Breuilh L, Trinel PA, Chamaillard M, Trottein F, Poulain D (2006) Specific recognition of Candida albicans by macrophages requires galectin-3 to discriminate Saccharomyces cerevisiae and needs association with TLR2 for signaling. J Immunol 177(7):4679–4687PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Johnson MD, Plantinga TS, van de Vosse E, Velez Edwards DR, Smith PB, Alexander BD, Yang JC, Kremer D, Laird GM, Oosting M, Joosten LA, van der Meer JW, van Dissel JT, Walsh TJ, Perfect JR, Kullberg BJ, Scott WK, Netea MG (2012) Cytokine gene polymorphisms and the outcome of invasive candidiasis: a prospective cohort study. Clin Infect Dis 54(4):502–510. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir827 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Senapati S, Chaturvedi P, Chaney WG, Chakraborty S, Gnanapragassam VS, Sasson AR, Batra SK (2011) Novel INTeraction of MUC4 and galectin: potential pathobiological implications for metastasis in lethal pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res 17(2):267–274. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1937 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Lok DJ, Van Der Meer P, de la Porte PW, Lipsic E, Van Wijngaarden J, Hillege HL, van Veldhuisen DJ (2010) Prognostic value of galectin-3, a novel marker of fibrosis, in patients with chronic heart failure: data from the DEAL-HF study. Clin Res Cardiol 99(5):323–328. doi: 10.1007/s00392-010-0125-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Morrell M, Fraser VJ, Kollef MH (2005) Delaying the empiric treatment of candida bloodstream infection until positive blood culture results are obtained: a potential risk factor for hospital mortality. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49(9):3640–3645. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3640-3645.2005 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.León C, Ruiz-Santana S, Saavedra P, Galván B, Blanco A, Castro C, Balasini C, Utande-Vázquez A, González de Molina FJ, Blasco-Navalproto MA, López MJ, Charles PE, Martín E, Hernández-Viera MA; Cava Study Group (2009) Usefulness of the “Candida score” for discriminating between Candida colonization and invasive candidiasis in non-neutropenic critically ill patients: a prospective multicenter study. Crit Care Med 37(5):1624–1633. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819daa14 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Cuenca-Estrella M, Verweij PE, Arendrup MC, Arikan-Akdagli S, Bille J, Donnelly JP, Jensen HE, Lass-Flörl C, Richardson MD, Akova M, Bassetti M, Calandra T, Castagnola E, Cornely OA, Garbino J, Groll AH, Herbrecht R, Hope WW, Kullberg BJ, Lortholary O, Meersseman W, Petrikkos G, Roilides E, Viscoli C, Ullmann AJ; ESCMID Fungal Infection Study Group (2012) ESCMID* guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: diagnostic procedures. Clin Microbiol Infect 18(Suppl 7):9–18. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12038 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar