Evaluation of PCR methods for the diagnosis of pertussis by the European surveillance network for vaccine-preventable diseases (EUVAC.NET)

  • T. Dalby
  • N. K. Fry
  • K. A. Krogfelt
  • J. S. Jensen
  • Q. He
  • on behalf of the pertussis EQA participants


This study aimed to evaluate the performance of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods used for the diagnosis of pertussis in laboratories within Europe in 2011. National reference laboratories in 25 European countries were contacted and a total of 24 laboratories from 19 countries agreed to participate in the study. A panel of seven samples of DNA from Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis and Bordetella holmesii plus a negative control were distributed and analysed according to the routine PCR methods in each laboratory. The study took place in 2011. Nineteen laboratories used a real-time PCR approach, four laboratories used block-based PCR and one laboratory used a combination of methods. Six different combinations of amplification targets were used, and ten laboratories tested only for the presence of B. pertussis DNA. All laboratories (24/24) correctly identified a sample with high concentration of B. pertussis DNA, while three misidentified the B. parapertussis DNA as B. pertussis and 15 misidentified the B. holmesii DNA as either B. pertussis or B. parapertussis. There was a wide variation in the methods used for PCR-based diagnosis of pertussis among the European laboratories. Several laboratories were not able to discriminate between DNA samples from different Bordetella species.

Supplementary material

10096_2013_1874_MOESM1_ESM.docx (23 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 23 kb)


  1. 1.
    Watanabe M, Nagai M (2004) Whooping cough due to Bordetella parapertussis: an unresolved problem. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther 2(3):447–454PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Njamkepo E, Bonacorsi S, Debruyne M, Gibaud SA, Guillot S, Guiso N (2011) Significant finding of Bordetella holmesii DNA in nasopharyngeal samples from French patients with suspected pertussis. J Clin Microbiol 49(12):4347–4348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yih WK, Silva EA, Ida J, Harrington N, Lett SM, George H (1999) Bordetella holmesii-like organisms isolated from Massachusetts patients with pertussis-like symptoms. Emerg Infect Dis 5(3):441–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mooi FR, Bruisten S, Linde I, Reubsaet F, Heuvelman K, van der Lee S, King AJ (2012) Characterization of Bordetella holmesii isolates from patients with pertussis-like illness in The Netherlands. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 64(2):289–291PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bottero D, Griffith MM, Lara C, Flores D, Pianciola L, Gaillard ME, Mazzeo M, Zamboni MI, Spoleti MJ, Anchart E, Ruggeri D, Sorhouet C, Fiori S, Galas M, Tondella ML, Hozbor DF (2013) Bordetella holmesii in children suspected of pertussis in Argentina. Epidemiol Infect 141(4):714–717Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Miranda C, Porte L, García P (2012) Bordetella holmesii in nasopharyngeal samples from Chilean patients with suspected Bordetella pertussis infection. J Clin Microbiol 50(4):1505PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cherry JD, Seaton BL (2012) Patterns of Bordetella parapertussis respiratory illnesses: 2008–2010. Clin Infect Dis 54(4):534–537PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wernli D, Emonet S, Schrenzel J, Harbarth S (2011) Evaluation of eight cases of confirmed Bordetella bronchiseptica infection and colonization over a 15-year period. Clin Microbiol Infect 17(2):201–203PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Le Coustumier A, Njamkepo E, Cattoir V, Guillot S, Guiso N (2011) Bordetella petrii infection with long-lasting persistence in human. Emerg Infect Dis 17(4):612–618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Xing D, Markey K, Newland P, Rigsby P, Hockley J, He Q (2011) EUVAC.NET collaborative study: evaluation and standardisation of serology for diagnosis of pertussis. J Immunol Methods 372(1–2):137–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fry N, Dalby T, He Q (2012) External quality assurance scheme on PCR for Bordetella pertussis, 2012. On behalf of EUpert-labnet network. ECDC Technical Report. Available online at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/publications/20120906-ter-eqa-pertusis.pdf
  12. 12.
    Dalby T, Krogfelt KA, Wirsing von Koenig CH, Riffelmann M, Guiso N, Guillot S, Fry N, He Q (2012) Guidance and protocol for the use of real-time PCR in laboratory diagnosis of human infection with Bordetella pertussis or Bordetella parapertussis. As part of the EUpert-Labnet surveillance network. ECDC Technical Report. Available online at: http://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications/Publications/Guidance-protocol-PCR-laboratory-diagnosis-bordatella-pertussis-parapertussis.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Dalby
    • 1
  • N. K. Fry
    • 2
  • K. A. Krogfelt
    • 1
  • J. S. Jensen
    • 1
  • Q. He
    • 3
  • on behalf of the pertussis EQA participants
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Infection ControlStatens Serum InstitutCopenhagen SDenmark
  2. 2.Respiratory and Vaccine Preventable Bacteria Reference UnitHealth Protection Agency, ColindaleLondonUK
  3. 3.Department of Infectious Disease Surveillance and ControlNational Institute for Health and WelfareTurkuFinland

Personalised recommendations