Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Microsatellite-primed PCR and random primer amplification polymorphic DNA for the identification and epidemiology of dermatophytes

  • Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study demonstrates the capacity of the one-step polymerase chain reaction (PCR) fingerprinting method using the microsatellite primers (GACA)4 or (GTG)5 (MSP-PCR) to identify six of the most frequent dermatophyte species causing cutaneous mycosis. PCR with (GACA)4 was a suitable method to recognise Microsporum canis, Microsporum gypseum, Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton interdigitale among 82 Argentinian clinical isolates, producing the most simple and reproducible band profiles. In contrast, the identification of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton tonsurans was achieved using PCR with (GTG)5. In this way, the sequential application of PCR using (GACA)4 and (GTG)5 allowed the successful typification of clinical isolates which had not been determined by mycological standard techniques. In this work, the intraspecies variability among 33 clinical isolates of M. canis was detected using random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD-PCR) with the primers OPI-07 and OPK-20. The genetic variations in the isolates of M. canis were not associated with clinical features of lesions or pet ownership, but a geographical restriction of one genotype was determined with OPK-20, suggesting a clonal diversity related to different ecological niches in certain geographical areas. The results of this work demonstrate that the detection of intraspecies polymorphisms in M. canis by RAPD-PCR may be applied in future molecular epidemiological studies to identify endemic strains, the route of infection in an outbreak or the coexistence of different strains in a single infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Achterman RR, White TC (2012) Dermatophyte virulence factors: identifying and analyzing genes that may contribute to chronic or acute skin infections. Int J Microbiol 2012:358305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jensen RH, Arendrup MC (2012) Molecular diagnosis of dermatophyte infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 25(2):126–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chiapello LS, Dib MD, Nuncira CT, Nardelli L, Vullo C, Collino C, Abiega C, Cortes PR, Spesso MF, Masih DT (2011) Mycetoma of the scalp due to Microsporum canis: hystopathologic, mycologic, and immunogenetic features in a 6-year-old girl. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 70(1):145–149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hay RJ, Jones RM (2010) New molecular tools in the diagnosis of superficial fungal infections. Clin Dermatol 28(2):190–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kanbe T, Suzuki Y, Kamiya A, Mochizuki T, Kawasaki M, Fujihiro M, Kikuchi A (2003) Species-identification of dermatophytes Trichophyton, Microsporum and Epidermophyton by PCR and PCR-RFLP targeting of the DNA topoisomerase II genes. J Dermatol Sci 33(1):41–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Faggi E, Pini G, Campisi E (2002) PCR fingerprinting for identification of common species of dermatophytes. J Clin Microbiol 40(12):4804–4805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu D, Pearce L, Lilley G, Coloe S, Baird R, Pedersen J (2002) PCR identification of dermatophyte fungi Trichophyton rubrum, T. soudanense and T. gourvilii. J Med Microbiol 51(2):117–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Shin JH, Sung JH, Park SJ, Kim JA, Lee JH, Lee DY, Lee ES, Yang JM (2003) Species identification and strain differentiation of dermatophyte fungi using polymerase chain reaction amplification and restriction enzyme analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol 48(6):857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gräser Y, Scott J, Summerbell R (2008) The new species concept in dermatophytes—a polyphasic approach. Mycopathologia 166(5–6):239–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meyer W, Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, Vilgalys R (1993) Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol 31(9):2274–2280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhu H, Wen H, Liao W (2002) Identification of Trichophyton rubrum by PCR fingerprinting. Chin Med J (Engl) 115(8):1218–1220

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shehata AS, Mukherjee PK, Aboulatta HN, el-Akhras AI, Abbadi SH, Ghannoum MA (2008) Single-step PCR using (GACA)4 primer: utility for rapid identification of dermatophyte species and strains. J Clin Microbiol 46(8):2641–2645

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Faggi E, Pini G, Campisi E, Bertellini C, Difonzo E, Mancianti F (2001) Application of PCR to distinguish common species of dermatophytes. J Clin Microbiol 39(9):3382–3385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Chung TH, Park GB, Lim CY, Park HM, Choi GC, Youn HY, Chae JS, Hwang CY (2010) A rapid molecular method for diagnosing epidemic dermatophytosis in a racehorse facility. Equine Vet J 42(1):73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson CJ, Barton RC, Kelly SL, Evans EG (2000) Strain identification of Trichophyton rubrum by specific amplification of subrepeat elements in the ribosomal DNA nontranscribed spacer. J Clin Microbiol 38(12):4527–4534

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baeza LC, Matsumoto MT, Almeida AM, Mendes-Giannini MJ (2006) Strain differentiation of Trichophyton rubrum by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA and analysis of rDNA nontranscribed spacer. J Med Microbiol 55(Pt 4):429–436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yazdanparast A, Jackson CJ, Barton RC, Evans EG (2003) Molecular strain typing of Trichophyton rubrum indicates multiple strain involvement in onychomycosis. Br J Dermatol 148(1):51–54

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ohst T, de Hoog S, Presber W, Stavrakieva V, Gräser Y (2004) Origins of microsatellite diversity in the Trichophyton rubrumT. violaceum clade (Dermatophytes). J Clin Microbiol 42(10):4444–4448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gräser Y, Fröhlich J, Presber W, de Hoog S (2007) Microsatellite markers reveal geographic population differentiation in Trichophyton rubrum. J Med Microbiol 56(Pt 8):1058–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anzawa K, Kawasaki M, Hironaga M, Mochizuki T (2011) Genetic relationship between Trichophyton mentagrophytes var. interdigitale and Arthroderma vanbreuseghemii. Med Mycol J 52(3):223–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kaszubiak A, Klein S, de Hoog GS, Gräser Y (2004) Population structure and evolutionary origins of Microsporum canis, M. ferrugineum and M. audouinii. Infect Genet Evol 4(3):179–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu J, Wan Z, Chen W, Wang W, Li R (2004) Molecular typing study of the Microsporum canis strains isolated from an outbreak of tinea capitis in a school. Mycopathologia 157(1):37–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sharma R, de Hoog S, Presber W, Gräser Y (2007) A virulent genotype of Microsporum canis is responsible for the majority of human infections. J Med Microbiol 56(Pt 10):1377–1385

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Cano J, Rezusta A, Solé M, Gil J, Rubio MC, Revillo MJ, Guarro J (2005) Inter-single-sequence-repeat-PCR typing as a new tool for identification of Microsporum canis strains. J Dermatol Sci 39(1):17–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Leibner-Ciszak J, Dobrowolska A, Krawczyk B, Kaszuba A, Staczek P (2010) Evaluation of a PCR melting profile method for intraspecies differentiation of Trichophyton rubrum and Trichophyton interdigitale. J Med Microbiol 59(Pt 2):185–192

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Roque HD, Vieira R, Rato S, Luz-Martins M (2006) Specific primers for rapid detection of Microsporum audouinii by PCR in clinical samples. J Clin Microbiol 44(12):4336–4341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Davel G, Perrotta D, Canteros C, Cordoba S, Rodero L, Brudny M, Abrantes R (1999) Multicenter study of superficial mycoses in Argentina. EMMS Group. Rev Argent Microbiol 31(4):173–181

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Santos PE, Córdoba S, Rodero LL, Carrillo-Muñoz AJ, Lopardo HA (2010) Tinea capitis: two years experience in a paediatric hospital of Buenos Aires, Argentina. Rev Iberoam Micol 27(2):104–106

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Meyer W, Maszewska K, Sorrell TC (2001) PCR fingerprinting: a convenient molecular tool to distinguish between Candida dubliniensis and Candida albicans. Med Mycol 39(2):185–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Di Conza JA, Nepote AF, González AM, Lurá MC (2007) (GTG)5 microsatellite regions in citrinin-producing Penicillium. Rev Iberoam Micol 24(1):34–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by Programa de Subsidios a Proyectos de Extensión (SEU-UNC) and PID 2012-2013 (Secyt-UNC). M.F.S. was a fellow of Secyt-UNC. V.L.B. is a fellow of CONICET. D.T.M. and L.S.C. are members of the Research Career of CONICET.

We thank the native English speaker, Dr. Paul Hobson, for revising the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. S. Chiapello.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 6308 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spesso, M.F., Nuncira, C.T., Burstein, V.L. et al. Microsatellite-primed PCR and random primer amplification polymorphic DNA for the identification and epidemiology of dermatophytes. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32, 1009–1015 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1839-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-013-1839-3

Keywords

Navigation