The effect of manuka honey on the structure of Pseudomonas aeruginosa

  • A. F. Henriques
  • R. E. Jenkins
  • N. F. Burton
  • R. A. CooperEmail author


The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of manuka honey on the structural integrity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC) of manuka honey for P. aeruginosa were determined by a microtitre plate method, and the survival of bacteria exposed to a bactericidal concentration of manuka honey was monitored. The effect of manuka honey on the structure of the bacteria was investigated using scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM, respectively). The MIC and MBC values of manuka honey against P. aeruginosa were 9.5% (w/v) and 12% (w/v) respectively; a time–kill curve demonstrated a bactericidal rather than a bacteriostatic effect, with a 5 log reduction estimated within 257 min. Using SEM, loss of structural integrity and marked changes in cell shape and surface were observed in honey-treated cultures. With TEM, these changes were confirmed, and evidence of extensive cell disruption and lysis was found. Manuka honey does not induce the same structural changes in P. aeruginosa as those observed in staphylococci. Our results indicate that manuka honey has the potential to be an effective inhibitor of P. aeruginosa.


Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Minimum Bactericidal Concentration Display Cell Surface Manuka Honey Kill Curve 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We wish to thank Drs. Hann and Turner of the Electron Microscope Unit at Cardiff University, Wales, UK.


  1. 1.
    Branski LK, Al-Mousawi A, Rivero H, Jeschke MG, Sanford AP, Herndon DN (2009) Emerging infections in burns. Surg Infect 10(5):389–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Keen EF 3rd, Robinson BJ, Hospenthal DR, Aldous WK, Wolf SE, Chung KK, Murray CK (2010) Prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms recovered at a military burn center. Burns 36(6):819–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fazli M, Bjarnsholt T, Kirketerp-Møller K, Jørgensen B, Andersen AS, Krogfelt KA, Givskov M, Tolker-Nielsen T (2009) Nonrandom distribution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus in chronic wounds. J Clin Microbiol 47(12):4084–4089CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blair SE, Carter DA (2005) The potential for honey in the management of wound and infection. J Australian Infection Control 10:24–31Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Molan PC (1992) The antibacterial activity of honey. 1. The nature of the antibacterial activity. Bee World 73:5–28Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper RA, Halas E, Molan PC (2002) The efficacy of honey in inhibiting strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from infected burns. J Burn Care Rehabil 23:366–370CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cooper RA, Molan PC, Harding KG (2002) The sensitivity to honey of Gram-positive cocci of clinical significance isolated from wounds. J Appl Microbiol 93:857–863CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    French VM, Cooper RA, Molan PC (2005) The antibacterial activity of honey against coagulase-negative staphylococci. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:228–231CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wahdan HAL (1998) Causes of the antimicrobial activity of honey. Infection 26:26–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Willix DJ, Molan PC, Harfoot CG (1992) A comparison of the sensitivity of wound-infecting species of bacteria to the antibacterial activity of manuka honey and other honey. J Appl Bacteriol 73:388–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Karayil S, Deshpande SD, Koppikar GV (1998) Effect of honey on multidrug resistant organisms and its synergistic action with three common antibiotics. J Postgrad Med 44:93–96PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kwakman PH, te Velde AA, de Boer L, Speijer D, Vandenbroucke-Grauls CM, Zaat SA (2010) How honeys kills bacteria. FASEB J 24(7):2576–2582CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blair SE, Cokcetin NN, Harry EJ, Carter DA (2009) The unusual antibacterial activity of medical-grade Leptospermum honey: antibacterial spectrum, resistance and transcriptome analysis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 28(10):1199–1208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Henriques AF, Jenkins RE, Burton NF, Cooper RA (2009) The intracellular effects of manuka honey on Staphylococcus aureus. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 29:45–50. doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0817-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Allen KL, Molan PC, Reid GM (1991) A survey of the antibacterial activity of some New Zealand honeys. J Pharm Pharmacol 43(12):817–882PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lemar KM, Turner MP, Lloyd D (2002) Garlic (Allium sativum) as an anti-Candida agent: a comparison of the efficacy of fresh garlic and freeze-dried extracts. J Appl Microbiol 93:398–405CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. F. Henriques
    • 1
    • 2
  • R. E. Jenkins
    • 1
  • N. F. Burton
    • 1
  • R. A. Cooper
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Centre for Biomedical Sciences, Cardiff School of Health SciencesUniversity of Wales Institute CardiffCardiffUK
  2. 2.Instituto de Biologia Molecular e Celular, Group of Molecular MicrobiologyUniversidade do PortoPortoPortugal

Personalised recommendations