Impact of empiric antibiotic regimen on bowel colonization in neonates with suspected early onset sepsis
- 212 Downloads
The purpose of this study was to compare the impact of ampicillin and penicillin used for empiric treatment of early onset sepsis (EOS) on initial gut colonization by aerobic and facultative anaerobic microorganisms. A cluster-randomized, two-center, switch-over study was conducted in two paediatric intensive care units in Estonia and included 276 neonates. Rectal swabs were collected twice a week until discharge or day 60. Colonizing microbes were identified on species level and tested for ampicillin resistance (AR). The number of patients colonized with Gram negative microorganisms and Candida spp was similar in both treatment arms but ampicillin resulted in longer colonization duration (CD) of K. pneumonia (p = 0.012), AR Serratia spp (p = 0.012) and Candida spp (p = 0.02) and penicillin in that of AR Acinetobacter spp (p = 0.001). As for Gram positive microorganisms penicillin treatment was associated with a greater number of colonized patients and higher CD of Enterococcus spp and S. aureus but lower ones of S. haemolyticus and S. hominis. Influence of ampicillin and penicillin on initial gut colonization is somewhat different but these differences are of low clinical relevance and should not be a limiting step when choosing between these two antibiotics for the empiric treatment of EOS.
The study was supported by Estonian Science Foundation Grant number 6984; Estonian Target Financing number 2726 and ESPID Small Grant Award. The authors are grateful to colleagues from both participating NICUs for their support and help in documenting all clinical decisions, as well as to head nurse Tiina Kilg and all nurses for their help in collecting samples. We would like to thank associated Professor Reet Mändar for her valuable remarks and suggestions while preparing the manuscript.
- 3.Young TE, Mangum B (2004) Neofax: a manual of drugs used in neonatal care. Acorn Publishing, RaleighGoogle Scholar
- 4.Mehta D (2005) BNF49: British National Formulary. Pharmaceutical Press, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
- 6.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Higgins RD, Fanaroff AA, Duara S, Goldberg R, Laptook A, Walsh M, Oh W, Hale E (2005) Very low birth weight preterm infants with early onset neonatal sepsis: the predominance of gram-negative infections continues in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 2002–2003. Pediatr Infect Dis J 24:635–639CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Metsvaht T, Ilmoja ML, Parm U, Maipuu L, Merila M, Lutsar I (2010) Comparison of ampicillin plus gentamicin vs. penicillin plus gentamicin in empiric treatment of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis. Acta Paediatr 99:665–672Google Scholar
- 17.CLSI (2005) Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; fifteenth informational supplement. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, pp 24–25Google Scholar
- 25.Mammina C, Di Carlo P, Cipolla D, Giuffre M, Casuccio A, Di Gaetano V, Plano MR, D’Angelo E, Titone L, Corsello G (2007) Surveillance of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacilli in a neonatal intensive care unit: prominent role of cross transmission. Am J Infect Control 35:222–230CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Cassettari VC, da Silveira IR, Dropa M, Lincopan N, Mamizuka EM, Matte MH, Matte GR, Menezes PR (2009) Risk factors for colonisation of newborn infants during an outbreak of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae in an intermediate-risk neonatal unit. J Hosp Infect 71:340–347CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Fraser S (2006) Enterococcal infections: eMedicine Specialties. EMedicine, pp 1–18Google Scholar