Real-time PCR strategy and detection of bacterial agents of lymphadenitis



The aim of this study was to compare 16 S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing with a systematic real-time PCR assay screening strategy that includes all common known pathogens recovered from lymph node biopsy specimens. Lymph node biopsy samples sent to our laboratory from January 2007 to December 2008 were tested in the study. Lymph nodes were screened for the presence of any bacteria by PCR amplification and sequencing targeting the 16 S rRNA gene and also by a specific real-time PCR strategy that includes Bartonella henselae, mycobacteria, Francisella tularensis, and Tropheryma whipplei. By testing 491 lymph nodes, we found that the sensitivity of our specific real-time PCR assay strategy was significantly higher than 16 S rRNA PCR amplification and sequencing for the detection of Bartonella henselae (142 vs 98; p < 10−4), Francisella tularensis (16 vs 10, p < 10−4), and mycobacteria (8 versus 3, p < 10−4). None of the samples was positive for Tropheryma whipplei. Our study demonstrates the usefulness and specificity of a systematic real-time PCR strategy for molecular analysis of lymph node biopsy specimens and the higher sensitivity compared with standard 16 S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing.


  1. 1.
    Rolain JM, Lepidi H, Zanaret M et al (2006) Lymph node biopsy specimens and diagnosis of cat-scratch disease. Emerg Infect Dis 12(9):1338–1344PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fournier PE, Bernabeu L, Schubert B, Mutillod M, Roux V, Raoult D (1998) Isolation of Francisella tularensis by centrifugation of shell vial cell culture from an inoculation eschar. J Clin Microbiol 36(9):2782–2783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lepidi H, Costedoat N, Piette JC, Harle JR, Raoult D (2002) Immunohistological detection of Tropheryma whipplei (Whipple bacillus) in lymph nodes. Am J Med 113(4):334–336CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carlioz A, Martelin R, Gayral JP, Raoult D (2000) 16 S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol 38(10):3623–3630PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rolain JM, Fenollar F, Raoult D (2007) False positive PCR detection of Tropheryma whipplei in the saliva of healthy people. BMC Microbiol 7:48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roux V, Raoult D (1995) Inter- and intraspecies identification of Bartonella (Rochalimea) species. J Clin Microbiol 33:1573–1579PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Angelakis E, Lepidi H, Canel A et al (2008) Human case of Bartonella alsatica lymphadenitis. Emerg Infect Dis 14(12):1951–1953CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anthony PP, Knowles SA (1983) Lymphadenopathy as a primary presenting sign: a clinicopathological study of 228 cases. Br J Surg 70(7):412–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ridder GJ, Boedeker CC, Technau-Ihling K, Grunow R, Sander A (2002) Role of cat-scratch disease in lymphadenopathy in the head and neck. Clin Infect Dis 35(6):643–649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chau I, Kelleher MT, Cunningham D et al (2003) Rapid access multidisciplinary lymph node diagnostic clinic: analysis of 550 patients. Br J Cancer 88(3):354–361CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nigrovic LE, Wingerter SL (2008) Tularemia. Infect Dis Clin North Am 22(3):489–504, ixCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schneider T, Moos V, Loddenkemper C, Marth T, Fenollar F, Raoult D (2008) Whipple’s disease: new aspects of pathogenesis and treatment. Lancet Infect Dis 8(3):179–190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Drancourt M, Berger P, Terrada C et al (2008) High prevalence of fastidious bacteria in 1520 cases of uveitis of unknown etiology. Medicine (Baltimore) 87(3):167–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fenollar F, Roux V, Stein A, Drancourt M, Raoult D (2006) Analysis of 525 samples to determine the usefulness of PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene for diagnosis of bone and joint infections. J Clin Microbiol 44(3):1018–1028CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raoult D, Casalta JP, Richet H et al (2005) Contribution of systematic serological testing in diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 43(10):5238–5242CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Levy PY, Fournier PE, Charrel R, Metras D, Habib G, Raoult D (2006) Molecular analysis of pericardial fluid: a 7-year experience. Eur Heart J 27(16):1942–1946CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16 S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173:697–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raoult D, Roblot F, Rolain JM et al (2006) First isolation of Bartonella alsatica from a valve of a patient with endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 44(1):278–279CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bruijnesteijn Van Coppenraet ES, Lindeboom JA, Prins JM, Peeters MF, Claas EC, Kuijper EJ (2004) Real-time PCR assay using fine-needle aspirates and tissue biopsy specimens for rapid diagnosis of mycobacterial lymphadenitis in children. J Clin Microbiol 42(6):2644–2650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. Angelakis
    • 1
  • V. Roux
    • 1
  • D. Raoult
    • 1
  • J.-M. Rolain
    • 1
  1. 1.URMITE CNRS-IRD UMR 6236, Faculté de Médecine et de PharmacieUniversité de la MéditerranéeMarseille Cedex 05France

Personalised recommendations