Evaluation of a novel rapid one-step monoclonal chromatographic immunoassay for detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool from children
- 119 Downloads
A new rapid office-based one-step monoclonal immunoassay (RAPID Hp StAR, DakoCytomation, Cambridge, UK) for detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in stool was evaluated in children against invasive diagnostic methods and compared to the results of a monoclonal EIA targeting the same antigen (Amplified IDEIA Hp StAR, DakoCytomation, Cambridge, UK). Coded stool samples from 118 symptomatic children (0.3–18.8 years) were investigated prior to any anti-H. pylori therapy. Fifty-four children were H. pylori infected defined by positive culture and/or two other positive tests (13C- urea breath test, histology, rapid urea test), the remaining 64 children showed concordant negative results. Thirty-four infected children (4.8–17.8 years) were monitored with 13C- urea breath test (five remained positive) and stool test 6–8 weeks after anti-H. pylori therapy. The immunoassays were independently read by two investigators. The monoclonal EIA showed excellent sensitivity and specificity before (98% and 100%, respectively) and after therapy (100%; 96.2%). The rapid immunoassay was invalid for technical reasons in nine samples (5.9%). The two observers agreed in 31 positive and 93 negative results, but had discordant results in 17 samples (11.2%). Overall, the rapid test showed a poor sensitivity (63.8%–71.1%), but a good specificity (91.1%–96.2%) before treatment. We conclude that the new office based monoclonal enzyme immunoassay for diagnosis of H. pylori should be modified to improve sensitivity, inter-observer-variability and some technical problems. In contrast, the monoclonal EIA stool test is highly reliable, both pre- and post therapy, and equivalent to the 13C- urea breath test.
KeywordsPylorus Infection Stool Sample Test Line Urea Breath Test Pylorus Status
The study was financially supported by DakoCytomation, UK.
- 3.Oliveira AMR, Rocha GA, Queiroz DM, Mendes EN, de Carvalho AS, Ferrari TC, Nogueira AM (1999) Evaluation of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children from different age groups with and without duodenal ulcer. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 28:157–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Makristathis A, Barousch W, Pasching E, Binder C, Kuderna C, Apfalter P, Rotter ML, Hirschl AM (2000) Two enzyme immunoassays and PCR for detection of Helicobacter pylori in stool specimens from pediatric patients before and after eradication therapy. J Clin Microbiol 38:3710–3714PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Gisbert JP, Trapero M, Calvet X, Mendoza J, Quesada M, Güell M, Pajares JM (2004) Evaluation of three different tests for the detection of stool antigens to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 19:923–929PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zambon CF, Basso D, Navaglia F, Mazza S, Razetti M, Fogar P, Greco E, Gallo N, Farinati F, Rugge M, Plebani M (2004) Non-invasive diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection: simplified 13C-urea breath test, stool antigen testing, or DNA PCR in human feces in a clinical laboratory setting? Clin Biochem 37:261–267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Chisholm SA, Watson CL, Teare EL, Saverymuttu S, Owen RL (2004) Non-invasive diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in adult dyspeptic patients by stool antigen detection: does the rapid immunochromatography test provide a reliable alternative to conventional ELISA kits? J Med Microbiol 53:623–627PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kindermann A, Tasch C, Sauerwald T, Rüssmann H, Weigand H, Demmelmair H, Koletzko S (2000) Major differences of commercial ELISA to detect H. pylori infection in children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 31(Suppl 2):S148Google Scholar