Longitudinal study of patients after surgical treatment for cervical lesions: detection of HPV DNA and prevalence of HPV-specific antibodies
- 145 Downloads
The principal aims of this study were to test whether persistence of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA is predictive of recurrent disease in women after surgical treatment for cervical lesions, to distinguish between persistent and newly acquired HPV infection, and to observe the effect of surgical treatment on levels of HPV-specific antibodies. A group of 198 patients surgically treated for low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and 35 age-matched controls were monitored for 18 months at 6-month intervals. The presence of HPV DNA in cervical smears was detected by means of consensus polymerase chain reaction, and serum levels of HPV-specific antibodies to HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 were measured. In ten patients positive for HPV type 16 in consecutive samples, the HPV 16 variants were identified using a polymerase chain reaction specific for the long control region. Data regarding demographics, risk factors for cervical cancer, and risks related to HPV exposure were collected through a patient questionnaire. Subjects persistently positive for HPV DNA were more likely to present with cytological and/or colposcopical abnormalities. A higher reactivity to HPV-specific antibodies was observed in these women at the 18-month follow-up visit. All ten patients with HPV 16 infection detected in consecutive samples showed persistence of either the same prototype or the same variant during the follow-up period. Risky sexual behavior and smoking were more common in patients than in controls. Persistent HPV infection as demonstrated by both HPV DNA detection and antibody detection appears to be a risk factor for the recurrence of pathological findings in women after surgery. An individually based approach to surgical treatment is an important factor in the outcome of disease at follow-up.
KeywordsCervical Cancer Cervical Lesion Consecutive Sample Large Loop Excision Intratype Variation
This study was supported by a grant from the Internal Grant Agency of the Ministry of Health, Czech Republic, grant no. NC 7548-3.
- 3.Elfgren K, Bistoletti P, Dillner L, Walboomers JM, Meijer CJ, Dillner J (1996) Conization for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia is followed by disappearance of human papillomavirus deoxyribonucleic acid and a decline in serum and cervical mucus antibodies against human papillomavirus antigens. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:937–942PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Zielinski GD, Bais AG, Helmerhorst TJ, Verheijen RH, de Schipper FA, Snijders PJ, Voorhorst FJ, van Kemenade FJ, Rozendaal L, Meijer CJ (2004) HPV testing and monitoring of women after treatment of CIN 3: review of the literature and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol Surv 59:543–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.IARC Working Group (1995) Human papillomaviruses. IARC, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
- 11.Liaw KL, Glass AG, Manos MM, Greer CE, Scott DR, Sherman M, Burk RD, Kurman RJ, Wacholder S, Rush BB, Cadell DM, Lawler P, Tabor D, Schiffman M (1999) Detection of human papillomavirus DNA in cytologically normal women and subsequent cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions. J Natl Cancer Inst 91:954–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.de Roda Husman AM, Walboomers JM, Meijer CJ, Risse EK, Schipper ME, Helmerhorst TM, Bleker OP, Delius H, van den Brule AJ, Snijders PJ (1994) Analysis of cytomorphologically abnormal cervical scrapes for the presence of 27 mucosotropic human papillomavirus genotypes, using polymerase chain reaction. Int J Cancer 56:802–806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Ho L, Chan S-Y, Burk RD, Das BC, Fujinaga K, Icenogle JP, Kahn T, Kiviat N, Lancaster W, Mavromara-Nazos P, Labropoulou V, Mitrani-Rosenbaum S, Norrild B, Pillai MR, Stoerker J, Syrjänen K, Syrjänen SM, Tay S-K, Villa LL, Wheeler CM, Williamson A-L, Bernard H-U (1993) The genetic drift of human papillomavirus type 16 is a means of reconstructing prehistoric viral spread and the movement of ancient human populations. J Virol 67:6413–6423PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Tornesello ML, Duraturo ML, Salatiello I, Buonaguro L, Losito S, Botti G, Stellato G, Greggi S, Piccoli R, Pilotti S, Stefanon B, De PG, Franceschi S, Buonaguro FM (2004) Analysis of human papillomavirus type-16 variants in Italian women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer. J Med Virol 74:117–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Tachezy R, Hamsikova E, Hajek T, Mikyskova I, Smahel M, Van Ranst M, Kanka J, Havrankova A, Rob L, Guttner V, Slavik V, Anton M, Kratochvil B, Kotrsova L, Vonka V (1999) Human papillomavirus genotype spectrum in Czech women: correlation of HPV DNA presence with antibodies against HPV-16, 18, and 33 virus-like particles. J Med Virol 58:378–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.IARC Working Group (2005) IARC handbooks of cancer prevention: cervix cancer screening. IARC, Lyon, FranceGoogle Scholar
- 33.Fisher SG, Benitez-Bribiesca L, Nindl I, Stockfleth E, Muller M, Wolf H, Perez-Garcia F, Guzman-Gaona J, Gutierrez-Delgado F, Irvin W, Gissmann L (1996) The association of human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 antibodies with stage of cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 61:73–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Mayrand MH, Coutlee F, Hankins C, Lapointe N, Forest P, de Ladurantaye M, Roger M (2000) Detection of human papillomavirus type 16 DNA in consecutive genital samples does not always represent persistent infection as determined by molecular variant analysis. J Clin Microbiol 38:3388–3393PubMedGoogle Scholar