Advertisement

Calcolo

, Volume 54, Issue 2, pp 609–641 | Cite as

A time semi-exponentially fitted scheme for chemotaxis-growth models

  • M. Akhmouch
  • M. Benzakour AmineEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this work, we develop a new linearized implicit finite volume method for chemotaxis-growth models. First, we derive the scheme for a simplified chemotaxis model arising in embryology. The model consists of two coupled nonlinear PDEs: parabolic convection-diffusion equation with a logistic source term for the cell-density, and an elliptic reaction-diffusion equation for the chemical signal. The numerical approximation makes use of a standard finite volume scheme in space with a special treatment for the convection-diffusion fluxes which are approximated by the classical Il’in fluxes. For the time discretization, we introduce our linearized semi-exponentially fitted scheme. The paper gives a comparison between the proposed scheme and different versions of linearized backward Euler schemes. The existence and uniqueness of a numerical solution to the scheme and its convergence to a weak solution of the studied system are proved. In the last section, we present some numerical tests to show the performance of our method. Our numerical approach is then applied to a chemotaxis-growth model describing bacterial pattern formation.

Keywords

Chemotaxis-growth Finite volume method Time discretization Exponential fitting 

Mathematics Subject Classification

65M08 65M12 92C17 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their patience and for their many constructive comments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human participants or animals

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Aida, M., Tsujikawa, T., Efendiev, M., Yagi, A., Mimura, M.: Lower estimate of the attractor dimension for a chemotaxis growth system. J. Lond. Math. Soc. 74(2), 453–474 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Akhmouch, M., Benzakour Amine, M.: Semi-implicit finite volume schemes for a chemotaxis-growth model. Indag. Math. 27(3), 702–720 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andreianov, B., Bendahmane, M., Saad, M.: Finite volume methods for degenerate chemotaxis model. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 235(14), 4015–4031 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bessemoulin-Chatard, M.: A finite volume scheme for convection-diffusion equations with nonlinear diffusion derived from the Scharfetter-Gummel scheme. Numer. Math. 121(4), 637–670 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bessemoulin-Chatard, M., Chainais-Hillairet, C., Filbet, F.: On discrete functional inequalities for some finite volume schemes. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 35(3), 1125–1149 (2015)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bessemoulin-Chatard, M., Jüngel, A.: A finite volume scheme for a Keller–Segel model with additional cross-diffusion. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 34(1), 96–122 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blanchet, A., Calvez, V., Carrillo, J.A.: Convergence of the mass-transport steepest descent scheme for the subcritical Patlak-Keller–Segel model. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 46, 691–721 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Budd, C.J., Carretero-Gonzlez, R., Russell, R.D.: Precise computations of chemotactic collapse using moving mesh methods. J. Comput. Phys. 202, 463–487 (2005)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Budrene, E.O., Berg, H.C.: Dynamics of formation of symmetrical patterns by chemotactic bacteria. Nature 376, 49–53 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chainais-Hillairet, C., Liu, J.G., Peng, Y.J.: Finite volume scheme for multi-dimensional drift-diffusion equations and convergence analysis. Math. Mod. Numer. Anal. 37, 319–338 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chamoun, G., Saad, M., Talhouk, R.: Monotone combined edge finite volume-finite element scheme for anisotropic Keller–Segel model. Numer. Methods Part. Differ. Equ. 30(3), 1030–1065 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chaplain, M.A.J., Lolas, G.: Mathematical modelling of cancer invasion of tissue: dynamic heterogeneity. Netw. Heterog. Media 1, 399–439 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chertock, A., Kurganov, A.: A positivity preserving central-upwind scheme for chemotaxis and haptotaxis models. Numer. Math. 111, 169–205 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Delgado, M., Morales-Rodrigo, C., Surez, A., Tello, J.I.: On a parabolic-elliptic chemotactic model with coupled boundary conditions. Nonlinear Anal. RWA 11, 3884–3902 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Epshteyn, Y.: Upwind-difference potentials method for Patlak-Keller–Segel Chemotaxis model. J. Sci. Comput. 53, 689–713 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Epshteyn, Y., Izmirlioglu, A.: Fully discrete analysis of a discontinuous finite element method for the Keller–Segel chemotaxis model. J. Sci. Comput. 40, 211–256 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Epshteyn, Y., Kurganov, A.: New interior penalty discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Keller–Segel chemotaxis model. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 47(1), 386–408 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Eymard, R., Fuhrmann, J., Gärtner, K.: A finite volume scheme for nonlinear parabolic equations derived from one-dimensional local Dirichlet problems. Numer. Math. 102, 463–495 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eymard, R., Gallouët, T., Herbin, R.: Finite volume methods. In: P. G. Ciarlet and J. L. Lions(eds.), Handbook of numerical analysis volume VII, 713-1020, North-Holland (2000)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Filbet, F.: A finite volume scheme for the Patlak-Keller–Segel chemotaxis model. Numer. Math. 104(4), 457–488 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gallouët, T., Latché, J.-C.: Compactness of discrete approximate solutions to parabolic pdes, application to a turbulence model. Commun. Pure Appl. Anal. 11(6), 2371–2391 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Haškovec, J., Schmeiser, C.: Convergence of a stochastic particle approximation for measure solutions of the 2D Keller–Segel system. Comm. Part. Diff. Equ. 36, 940–960 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Haškovec, J., Schmeiser, C.: Stochastic particle approximation for measure valued solutions of the 2D Keller–Segel system. J. Stat. Phys. 135(1), 133–151 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hillen, T., Painter, K.J.: A user’s guide to PDE models for chemotaxis. J. Math. Biol. 58, 183–217 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Horstmann, D.: From 1970 until now: the Keller–Segel model in chemotaxis and its consequences i. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math. Ver. 105, 103–165 (2003)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Horstmann, D.: From 1970 until now: the Keller–Segel model in chemotaxis and its consequences ii. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math. Ver. 106, 51–69 (2004)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ibrahim, M., Saad, M.: On the efficacy of a control volume finite element method for the capture of patterns for a volume-filling chemotaxis model. Comput. Math. Appl. 68(9), 1032–1051 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Il’in, A.M.: Differencing scheme for a differential equation with a small parameter affecting the highest derivative. Mat. Zametki 6, 237–248 (1969)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Keller, E.F., Segel, L.A.: Initiation of slime mold aggregation viewed as an instability. J. Theor. Biol. 26, 399–415 (1970)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lazarov, R.D., Mishev, I.D., Vassilevski, P.S.: Finite volume methods for convection-diffusion problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 33(1), 31–55 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Maini, P.K., Myerscough, M.R., Winters, K.H., Murray, J.D.: Bifurcating spatially heterogeneous solutions in a chemotaxis model for biological pattern formation. Bull. Math. Biol. 53, 701–719 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Marrocco, A.: Numerical simulation of chemotactic bacteria aggregation via mixed finite elements. Math. Mod. Num. Anal. 37, 617–630 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Murray, J.D.: Mathematical biology, vol. 2, 3rd edn. Springer, Berlin (2003)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Murray, J.D., Myerscough, M.R.: Pigmentation pattern formation on snakes. J. Theor. Biol. 149, 339–360 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Oster, G.F., Murray, J.D.: Pattern formation models and developmental constraints. J. Expl. Zool. 251, 186–202 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Patankar, S.V.: Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, Taylor and Francis Group, New York (1990)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Saito, N.: Conservative upwind finite-element method for a simplified Keller–Segel system modelling chemotaxis. IMA J. Numer. Anal. 27, 332–365 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Saito, N.: Error analysis of a conservative finite-element approximation for the Keller–Segel system of chemotaxis. Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal. 11(1), 339–364 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Saito, N., Suzuki, T.: Notes on finite difference schemes to a parabolic-elliptic system modelling chemotaxis. Appl. Math. Comput. 171(1), 72–90 (2005)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Scharfetter, D.L., Gummel, H.K.: Large signal analysis of a silicon read diode. IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev. 16, 64–77 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Strehl, R., Sokolov, A., Kuzmin, D., Horstmann, D., Turek, S.: A positivity-preserving finite element method for chemotaxis problems in 3D. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 239, 290–303 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Strehl, R., Sokolov, A., Kuzmin, D., Turek, S.: A flux-corrected finite element method for chemotaxis problems. Comput. Methods Appl. Math. 10(2), 219–232 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tello, J.I., Winkler, M.: A chemotaxis system with logistic source. Commun. Partial Diff. Eqn. 32, 849–877 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tello, J.I., Winkler, M.: Stabilization in a two-species chemotaxis system with a logistic source. Nonlinearity 25(5), 1413–1425 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Winkler, M.: Boundedness in the higher-dimensional parabolic-parabolic chemotaxis system with logistic source. Commun. Partial Diff. Eqn. 35, 1516–1537 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Woodward, D., Tyson, R., Myerscough, M., Murray, J., Budrene, E., Berg, H.: Spatio-temporal patterns generated by S. typhimurium. Biophys. J. 68, 2181–2189 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yang, X., Shi, B., Chai, Z.: Coupled lattice Boltzmann method for generalized Keller–Segel chemotaxis model. Comput. Math. Appl. 68, 1653–1670 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Département de Mathématiques, Faculté des sciences et techniques de FèsUSMBAFèsMorocco

Personalised recommendations