Advertisement

Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 64, Issue 6, pp 709–719 | Cite as

Property gradients in oil palm trunk (Elaeis guineensis)

  • Suthon Srivaro
  • Nirundorn Matan
  • Frank Lam
Original Article
  • 315 Downloads

Abstract

Since the structure of oil palm wood varies dramatically, the property gradients of oil palm wood within a trunk are of great interest. In this study, the physical (density, water uptake and swelling in the radial direction) and mechanical properties (bending modulus of elasticity and strength, compressive modulus of elasticity and strength in the direction parallel to the fiber, compressive strength in the direction perpendicular to the fiber and shear strength in the direction parallel to the fiber) of oil palm wood for a whole trunk were examined. The water uptake, compressive strength in the direction perpendicular to the fiber, shear strength in the direction parallel to the fiber, bending modulus of elasticity and strength and compressive modulus of elasticity and strength in the direction parallel to the fiber appeared to be independent of trunk height but tended to be related to the relative distance from surface or density by a single master curve. However, the swelling in the radial direction of the oil palm wood was not correlated with the relative distance from the surface, trunk height or density. Finally, property map of oil palm wood for a cross section at any height was prepared for practical use.

Keywords

Oil palm wood Property gradient Property map 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Thailand Research Fund through the Royal Golden Jubilee Advanced Programme (Contract no. RAP60K0017). The authors would also like to thank the Research Center of Excellent on Wood Science and Engineering, School of Engineering and Resources, Walailak University, Thailand, for providing facilities for experimental work. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    FAO (2017) FAOSTAT Online statistical service. Available from:http://www.fao.org/faostat Accessed 7 November 2017
  2. 2.
    Hartley CWS (1988) The oil palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.). Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Erwinsyah E (2008) Improvement of oil palm trunk properties using bioresin. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sulaiman O, Salim N, Nordin NF, Hashim R, Ibbrahim M, Sato M (2012) The potential of oil palm trunk biomass as an alternative source for compressed wood. BioRes 7(2):2688–2706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H’ng PS, Chai LY, Chin KL, Tay PW, Eng HK, Wong HY, Wong WZ, Chow MJ, Chai EW (2013) Urea formaldehyde impregnated oil palm trunk as the core layer for three-layered board. Mater Des 50:457–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Srivaro S (2014) Lightweight sandwich panel from oil palm wood core and rubberwood veneer faces. PhD Thesis, Walailak University, ThailandGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Srivaro S, Matan N, Lam F (2015) Stiffness and strength of oil palm wood core sandwich panel under center point bending. Mater Des 84:154–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khalid I, Sulaiman O, Hashim R, Razak W, Jumhuri N, Rasat MSM (2015) Evaluation on layering effects and adhesive rates of laminated compressed composite panels made from oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) fronds. Mater Des 68:24–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rich PM (1987) Developmental anatomy of the stem of Welfia–Georgii, Iriartea–Gigantea, and other arborescent palms—implications for mechanical support. Am J Bot 74:792–802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fathi L (2014) Structural and mechanical properties of the wood from coconut palms, oil palms and date palms. PhD Thesis, University of Hamburg, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Srivaro S, Rattanarat J, Noothong P (2018) Comparison of the anatomical characteristics and physical and mechanical properties of oil palm and bamboo trunks. J Wood Sci 64(3):186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lim SC, Khoo KC (1986) Characteristics of oil palm trunk and its potential utilization. The Malaysian Forester 49(1):3–21Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haslett AN (1990) Suitability of oil palm trunk for timber uses. J Trop For Sci 2(3):43–51Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gan KS, Choo KT, Lim SC (2001) Basic density and moisture content distributions in 30-years-old oil palm (Elaeis guineensis) stems. J Trop For Prod 7(2):184–191Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Walker JCF, Butterfield BG, Harris JM, Langrish TAG, Uprichard JM (1993) Primary wood processing. Chapman and Hall, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    ASTM D143 (2009) Standard test methods for small clear specimens of timber. ASTM international, USAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Killmann W, Koh MP (1988) Oil palm stem densification using ammonia treatment: a preliminary study. J Trop For Sci 1(1):1–10Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ratnasingam J, Ma TP, Manikam M, Farrokhpayam SR (2008) Evaluating the machining characteristics of oil palm lumber. Asian J Appl Sci 1(4):334–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kretschmann DE (2010) Mechanical properties of wood. In: Ross RJ (ed) Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. Forest product laboratory, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Omar NS, Bakar ES, Jalil NM, Tahir PM, Yunus WMZW (2011) Distribution of oil palm starch for different levels and portions of oil palm trunk. Wood Res J 2(2):73–77Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bodig J, Jayne BA (1982) Mechanics of wood and wood composites. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Glass SV, Zelinka SL (2010) Moisture relations and physical properties of wood. In: Ross RJ (ed) Wood handbook-Wood as an engineering material. Forest product laboratory, MadisonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rich PM (1987) Mechanical structure of the stem of arborescent palms. Bot Gaz 148:42–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    BS EN 338 (2016) Structural timber–strength classes. European committee for standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Materials Science and Engineering Program, School of Engineering and ResourcesWalailak UniversityNakhon Si ThammaratThailand
  2. 2.Department of Wood ScienceUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations