Advertisement

Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 64, Issue 2, pp 164–168 | Cite as

Enantiomeric analysis of monoterpenes in Oba-kuromozi (Lindera umbellata var. membranacea)

  • Risa Inoue
  • Koetsu Takahashi
  • Yoshiaki Iiduka
  • Daisuke Arai
  • Tatsuya AshitaniEmail author
Rapid communication
  • 148 Downloads

Keywords

Enantiomeric ratio Linalool Oba-kuromozi Terpenoid 

Introduction

Kuromozi (Lindera umbellata Thunb.) is an aromatic shrub that grows in Japanese forests, and it is used to prepare toothpicks and essential oils, the latter of which are important for the future of the forest products industry. Oba-kuromozi (L. umbellata var. membranacea) is a variation of the kuromozi found commonly in northeastern Japan (the Tohoku region) [1]. Recently, Japanese oak wilt, which is a disease mediated by the Platypus quercivorus beetle, has damaged oak forests in northeastern Japan [2], and it has been observed that deciduous shrubs, such as Oba-kuromozi, grow predominantly in the canopy gaps generated after Japanese oak wilt disease [3, 4]. Thus, Oba-kuromozi is promising as a useful forest resource in northeastern Japan.

Hayashi et al. [5] reported variations of the components of the essential oils obtained from L. umbellata Thunb., L. umbellata var. membranacea, L. umbellata var. lancea (Hime-kuromozi), Lindera sericea (Ke-kuromozi), and L. sericea var. glabrata (Usuge-kuromozi). The Oba-kuromozi essential oil consists mainly of monoterpenes, and it contains commercially important compounds, especially the fragrant compound linalool [6]. Some monoterpenes contain both (+) and (−) enantiomers in plant extracts, although the enantiomeric ratio differs in different plant species [7]. Linalool also contains both enantiomers in plant extract [6, 8]. The biological activities of linalool have been reported in racemate and each isomer, e.g., antileishmanial activity in rac-linalool [9], anesthetic activity in (S)-(+)-linalool [10], and acaricidal activity in (R)-(−)-linalool [11]. These enantiomers have different fragrance property [6, 8] and biological activity between (R)-(−)-linalool and (S)-(+)-linalool [12]. Therefore, it is important to analyze enantiomeric ratios of terpenoid in extracts for utilization of plant components and elucidation of plant physiology. The enantiomeric ratios of monoterpene also differ between different plant tissues, including the bark, leaves, and heartwood, or between intact and non-intact plant parts [13, 14]. However, details of the enantiomeric variations of the components of Oba-kuromozi oil were lacking. Therefore, in this study, we conducted a preliminary enantiomeric analysis of the monoterpene components of Oba-kuromozi.

Materials and methods

Preparation of extracts

Plant samples were collected from the Yamagata Field Science Center (Faculty of Agriculture, Yamagata University, Japan) on 26 October 2016 in Tsuruoka, Japan. Branches with leaves were cut from three Oba-kuromozi plants. The leaves were cut into 5-mm fragments. Branches less than 5 mm in diameter were classified as twigs and cut to less than 5-mm lengths after removing the leaves. Bark was peeled from branches of approximately 5–10 mm in diameter and shredded into roughly 5-mm lengths by scissors. After peeling away the bark, the woody part of the plants was cut to lengths of less than 5 mm. Five grams of each sample was extracted three times with 10–20 ml of hexane. Then, the three hexane extracts were combined and adjusted to a constant volume of 50 or 100 ml by adding hexane, and 1 μl of the extract solution was injected into a gas chromatograph to analyze its terpene components.

Authentic compounds

Standard compounds of (+)-α-pinene, (−)-α-pinene, (−)-β-pinene, (−)-α-phellandrene, (+)-3-carene, 1,8-cineole, γ-terpinene, terpinolene, piperitone, carvacrol, β-caryophyllene, and nerolidol were purchased from the Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan). Camphene, (+)-limonene, (±)-linalool, (±)-camphor, (−)-terpinen-4-ol, α-terpineol, and geraniol were purchased from the Kanto Chemical Industry Co., Inc. (Tokyo, Japan). (−)-Linalool was purchased from Sigma–Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA).

Analysis of compounds

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) data were collected with a Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) QP-2010 Ultra gas chromatograph–mass spectrometer under the following conditions: an Rtx-5 capillary column [30 m × 0.32 mm inner diameter; 0.25-μm film thickness; Restek (Bellefonte, PA, USA)], a column temperature ranging from 50 °C (1 min) to 320 °C (4 min) at 5 °C/min, an injection temperature of 230 °C, an interface temperature of 320 °C, and an acquisition mass range of 50–450 atomic mass units (EI, 70 eV) using helium as the carrier gas. Each peak in the chromatogram was identified by comparing the GC–MS data with authentic compounds or a reference [15].

An enantiomeric analysis was performed using a gas chromatograph–mass spectrometer attached to a CycloSil-B capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm inner diameter, 0.25-μm film thickness; Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) for a chiral compound analysis, a column temperature ranging from 60 to 200 °C (0 min) at 4 °C/min and from 200 to 240 °C (2 min) at 10 °C /min, an injection temperature of 230 °C, and an interface temperature of 240 °C. A GC-flame ionization detector analysis was performed with a Shimadzu GC-2014 gas chromatograph using the same capillary columns and temperature conditions as the GC-MS analysis and a detection temperature of 240 °C. The peak of each enantiomer was determined according to a reference [16]. The enantiomeric ratio was calculated by determining the percentage of one enantiomer peak area relative to the sum of both enantiomer peaks in a GC-flame ionization detector chromatogram.

Results and discussion

Variations of the component of different plant tissues

Figure 1 shows the total ion chromatograms of the mono- and sesquiterpenes obtained by the GC–MS analysis of sample no. 1. Mono- and sesquiterpenes in the woody part did not exist or were of very few amounts, because the extract of the woody part of the plant did not yield clear peaks in the chromatogram. The chromatograms of the other two plants yielded very similar results. The 1,8-cineol and linalool contents were higher than those of the other terpenes in the leaf extracts. In the twig and bark samples, linalool was detected clearly as a strong peak among the terpenes. While a chemical analysis of the essential oil of Oba-kuromozi has been reported, most studies focused on the essential oil of the leaves only or a mixture of leaves and branches. Furuhata et al. [17] reported differences in the components of kuromozi essential oil between the leaves and branches using an early GC instrument. However, until now, there were no studies of the components of the extracts of the leaves, barks, and twigs in Oba-kuromozi. Our results demonstrated that there are differences in the composition of the extracts of each tissue of the Oba-kuromozi plants. Therefore, preparing extracts from different plant tissues individually provide greater insights into the composition of the Oba-kuromozi oil.

Fig. 1

Representative chromatogram of Oba-kuromozi hexane extracts obtained by a GC–MS analysis using an Rtx-5MS column. Note: The chromatograms show a magnification of the detected range of the terpenoid components. Peak identification: 1, 3-hexanol; 2, 2-hexenal; 3, 3-hexen-1-ol; 4, α-pinene; 5, camphene; 6, α-phellandrene; 7, 3-carene; 8, 2-carene; 9, p-cymene; 10, limonene; 11, 1,8-cineole; 12, γ-terpinene; 13, cis-furan linalool oxide; 14, trans-furan linalool oxide; 15, linalool; 16, camphor; 17, terpinen-4-ol; 18, α-terpineol; 19, piperitone; 20, geraniol; 21, carvacrol; 22, α-terpineol acetate; 23, geranyl acetate; 24, caryophyllene; 25, germacrene d; 26, β-bisabolene; 27, α-bergamotene; 28, nerolidol; and 29, α-bisabolol

Enantiomeric ratios of monoterpenes

The enantiomers of the terpene components were analyzed by a chiral GC column. α-Pinene, linalool, terpinene-4-ol, and α-terpineol contained both (+) and (−) enantiomers. There were no significant differences in the enantiomeric ratios between the three plants. The enantiomeric ratios of terpinene-4-ol and α-terpineol, which were detected only in the leaf extract, were approximately 20:80 ((+):(−)) and 10:90, respectively. (R)-(−)-terpinen-4-ol and (S)-(−)-α-terpineol were more abundant than their corresponding isomers. The enantiomeric ratio of α-pinene was approximately 90:10 ((+):(−)), and there were no significant differences in the enantiomeric ratio between the leaves, bark, and twigs. For the terpene compounds, we found clear differences in the enantiomeric ratio of linalool between the different plant tissues. Figure 2 shows the peaks of the linalool enantiomers in the gas chromatograms of each sample. The calculated enantiomeric ratios of linalool are shown Table 1. Leaves contained more (R)-(−)-linalool than (S)-(+)-linalool, and in contrast, the bark and twigs contained more (S)-(+)-linalool than (R)-(−)-linalool. The biological activities such as fragrance property [6, 8] and microbial activity [12] differ between (R)-(−)-linalool and (S)-(+)-linalool. Although linalool is used as a fragrance, currently, the commercial product is racemic or (R)-(−)-excess linalool. Chemical and biological studies for (S)-(+)-linalool are comparatively difficult than (R)-(−)-linalool. The (S)-(+)-linalool of the bark and twigs of Oba-kuromozi will become important to efficiently use the extract components.

Fig. 2

Results of the enantiomeric analysis of linalool by GC–MS using a CycloSil-B column

Table 1

Enantiomeric ratios of the linalool contained in each extract

Individual plants

Tissues

Enantiomeric ratio (%)

(S)-(+)-linalool

(R)-(−)-linalool

Sample no. 1

Leaves

4.6

95.4

Twig

96.4

3.6

Bark

96.6

3.4

Sample no. 2

Leaves

5.4

94.6

Twig

92.3

7.7

Bark

93.5

6.5

Sample no. 3

Leaves

22

78

Twig

97.9

2.1

Bark

97.7

2.3

Conclusions

We clarified the terpenoid composition of the different tissues of Oba-kuromozi and showed that there was a difference in the composition of the extracts of these tissues. The leaf extract had much greater amounts of 1,8-cineol and linalool among the monoterpenes. The bark and twig extracts had very similar compositions, and linalool was a main component in these extracts. For the terpene compounds, clear differences in the enantiomeric ratio of linalool were found between the different tissues. Leaves contained more (R)-(−)-linalool than (S)-(+)-linalool, and in contrast, the bark and twigs contained more (S)-(+)-linalool than (R)-(−)-linalool. Based on the different compositions of the extracts of the different tissues, in the future, it will be possible to efficiently collect specific compounds. The bioactivity of linalool has attracted great attention, but very few studies have examined its optical isomers. In the future, we will study the seasonal variations and bioactivities of the components of the different tissues, as well as other Lindera spp.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the late Hiromasa Koyama, Professor of Yamagata University for providing idea of this study. We also thank Scott Lloyd, PhD, from Edanz Group for editing a draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Koyama H (1987) Taxonomic notes on Lindera umbellata and its allied in Japan (in Japanese). Acta Phytotax Geobot 38:161–175Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Saito S, Shibata M (2012) The forest structure and tree death rate of forest stands damaged by Japanese oak wilt in Yamagata prefecture (in Japanese). J Jpn For Soc 94: 223‒228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koyama H, Odano I, Hayashida H, Takahashi T (2014) The species composition, biomass and availability as cattle feed of the shrubs grown at the forest floors after mass mortality of canopy trees by oak wilt disease (in Japanese). Tohoku J For Sci 19(2): 51–58Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hayashida M, Otani Y, Ohtani H (2013) Changes in stand structure for 16 years before and after the mass mortality of Quercus crispula in oak secondary forests (in Japanese). Bull Yamagata Univ Agr Sci 16(4):297–304Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hayashi N, Komae H (1972) Chemotaxonomical studies of leaf oils of L. umbellata Thunb. Z Naturforsch 28c:227–228Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Aprotosoaie AC, Hăncianu M, Costache II, Miron A (2014) Linalool: a review on a key odorant molecule with valuable biological properties. Flavour Fragr J 29:193–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yassaa N, Wiliams J (2007) Enantiomeric monoterpene emissions from natural and damaged Scots pine in a boreal coniferous forest measured using solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography/mass spectrometry. J Chromatgr A 1141(1):138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sugawara Y, Hara C, Aioki T, Sugimoto N, Matsujima T (2000) Odor distinctiveness between enantiomers of linalool: difference in perception and responses elicited by sensory test and forehead surface potential wave measurement. Chem Sens 25:77–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dutra FL, Oliveira MM, Santos RS, Silva WS, Alviano DS, Vieira DP, Lopes AH (2016) Effects of linalool and eugenol on the survival of Leishmania (L.) infantum chagasi within macrophages. Acta Trop 164:69–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheng BH, Sheen LY, Chang ST (2015) Evaluation of anxiolytic potency of essential oil and S-(+)-linalool from Cinnamomum osmophloeum ct. linalool leaves in mice. J Tradit Compl Med 5:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Badawy MEI, El-Arami SAA, Abdelgaleil SAM (2010) Acaricidal and quantitative structure activity relationship of monoterpenes against the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae. Exp Appl Acarol 52(3):261–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silva LL, Balconi LS, Gressler LT, Garlet QI, Sutili FJ, Vargas APC, Baldisserotto B, Morel AF, Heinzmann BM (2017) S-(+)- and R-(−)-linalool: a comparison of the in vitro anti-Aeromonas hydrophila activity and anesthetic properties in fish. An Acad Bras Ciênc 89(1):203–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Borg-Karlson AK, Lindström M, Norin T, Persson M, Valterová I (1993) Enantiomeric composition of monoterpene hydrocarbons in different tissues of Norway spruce, Picea abies (L.) Karst. A multidimensional gas chromatography study. Acta Chem Scand 47:138–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wibe A, Borg-Karlson AK, Persson M, Norin T, Mustaparta H (1998) Enantiomeric composition of monoterpene hydrocarbons in some conifers and receptor neuron discrimination of α-pinene and limonene enantiomers in the pine weevil, Hylobius abietis. J Chem Ecol 24(2):273–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Adams RP (2012) Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, 4th edn. Allured Books, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Werkhoff P, Brennecke S, Bretschneider W, Güntert M, Hopp R, Surburg H (1993) Chirospecific analysis in essential oil, fragrance and flavor research. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 196:307–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Furuhata M, Horiguchi T, Kato M (1966) Pharmaceutical Studies on Chinese Drug “Wuzhang” I: On the seasonal variation of essential oil in Lindera umbellata thunb. Yakugaku Zasshi 86(8):683–687CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of AgricultureYamagata UniversityTsuruokaJapan
  2. 2.The United Graduate School of Agricultural ScienceIwate UniversityMoriokaJapan

Personalised recommendations