Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 54, Issue 5, pp 362–368 | Cite as

Load-carrying capacity of steel-to-timber joints with a pretensioned bolt

  • Ali Awaludin
  • Takuro Hirai
  • Toshiro Hayashikawa
  • Yoshihisa Sasaki
Original Article

Abstract

Previous experimental studies reported that bolt pretensioning greatly increases the initial stiffness and load-carrying capacity of bolted joints. It is also a matter of great importance to structural designers to understand the effect of pretension on the load-carrying capacities of bolted joints, and this study presents an extended yield model that considers the fastener’s pretension force. In the extended yield model, the load-carrying capacity was defined as the load at a slip of 15 mm. The ultimate fastener bending angle at the yielded cross section equivalent to this joint slip, which was affected by the fastener’s axial force, was iteratively evaluated in numerical analyses. The introduction of bolt pretensioning largely increased the joint slip resistance at initial loading, but it decreased the ultimate fastener bending angle. This decrease of fastener bending angle resulted in a relatively low stiffness hardening (or secondary stiffness), which is caused by secondary axial forces associated with embedment of steel plates into the wood member. Prediction was verified by the tests of 36 steel-to-timber joints under three different pretension forces and two loading directions relative to the grain. Some of the observed load-carrying capacities of the joints, particularly in loading perpendicular to the grain, however, were not as high as those expected by the numerical analyses considering the given pretension forces.

Key words

Load-carrying capacity Pretensioned bolt Timber joint Yield model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ritter MA, Wacker JP (1995) Field performance of stress-laminated timber bridge on low-volume roads. Proceeding of International Conference on Low-Volume Roads, 25–29 June, Minneapolis, vol 2, pp 347–356Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wipf TJ, Ritter MA, Wood DL (1999) Dynamic evaluation and testing of timber highway bridges. Proceedings of Pacific Timber Engineering Conference, 14–18 March, Rotorua, vol 3, pp 333–340Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Quenneville JHP, Dalen KV (1991) The enhanced performance of split-ring connections through prestressing. Can J Civ Eng 18: 830–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Awaludin A, Hirai T, Toshiro T, Sasaki Y, Oikawa A (2007) Effects of pretension in bolts on hysteretic responses of moment-carrying timber joints. J Wood Sci 54:114–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schreyer AC (2002) Monotonic and cyclic behavior of slender dowel-type fasteners in wood-steel-wood connections. M.A.Sc. Thesis, Department of Wood Science, University of British ColumbiaGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    British Standards Institution (2004) BS EN 1995-1-1:2004, Eurocode 5 — design of timber structures — part 1-1: general-common rules and rules for buildings. LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chang WS, Komatsu K, Hsu MF, Chen WJ (2007) On mechanical behavior of timber shear wall in Taiwan. J Wood Sci 53:17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    European Committee for Standardization (1991) EN 26891: timber structure — joints made with mechanical fasteners: general principle for the determination of strength and deformation characteristics. European Committee for Standardization, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Blass HJ, Bienhaus A, Kramer V (2000) Effective bending capacity of dowel-type fasteners. Proceedings of the 33rd CIB-W18, DelftGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jorissen A, Blass HJ (1998) The fastener yield strength in bending. Proceedings of the 31st CIB-W18, SavonlinnaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hirai T (1991) Analysis of the lateral resistance of bolt joints and drift-pin joints in timber II: numerical analysis applying the theory of a beam on an elastic foundation (in Japanese). Mokuzai Gakkaishi 37:1017–1025Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kamachi K, Ando N, Inayama M (2006) New method to estimate the load-slip characteristics of the double-shear bolted timber-totimber joints. Proceedings of World Conference on Timber Engineering, August 6–10, OregonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nishiyama N, Ando N (2003) Analysis of load-slip characteristics of nailed wood joints: application of a two-dimensional geometric nonlinear analysis. J Wood Sci 49:505–512Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hirai T, Tsujino T, Sasaki Y (2006) Steel washers on timber. Proceedings of World Conference on Timber Engineering, August 6–10, OregonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Manrique RE (1969) Stress relaxation of wood at several levels of strain. J Wood Sci Technol 3:49–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Foschi RO (1974) Load-slip characteristics of nails. J Wood Sci 7:69–74Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Prion H, Foschi R (1994) Cyclic behaviour of dowel type connections. Proceedings of Pacific Timber Engineering Conference, 11–15 July, Gold CoastGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    American Association of State Highway Officials (1991) Guide specifi cations for the design of stress-laminated wood decks. American Association of State Highway Officials, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Architecture Institute of Japan (2006) Standard for structural design of timber structures. Architecture Institute of Japan, Tokyo, pp 13–14, p 400Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    American Society for Testing and Materials (1994) Standard test methods for bolted connection in wood and wood-base products. ASTM section D07.05.02, Draft 8, American Society for Testing and Materials, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    American Society of Civil Engineers (1997) National design and specification for timber construction of US. American Society of Civil Engineers, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Awaludin
    • 1
  • Takuro Hirai
    • 2
  • Toshiro Hayashikawa
    • 3
  • Yoshihisa Sasaki
    • 2
  1. 1.Laboratory of Bridge and Structural Design Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  2. 2.Graduate School of AgricultureHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan
  3. 3.Graduate School of EngineeringHokkaido UniversitySapporoJapan

Personalised recommendations