Advertisement

Journal of Wood Science

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 311–317 | Cite as

Characterizing the setting of cement when mixed with cork, blue gum, or maritime pine, grown in Portugal I: temperature profiles and compatibility indices

  • Catarina Pereira
  • Fernando Caldeira Jorge
  • Mark Irle
  • José Maria Ferreira
Original Article

Abstract

Data are presented on the effects that cork, blue gum, or maritime pine, all grown in Portugal, have on cement setting. These materials were mixed with cement either without any treatment or after being extracted previously with a range of solvents (ranging from nonpolar to very polar). Other experiments were carried out in which extractives or calcium chloride were added to the cement paste. All lignocellulosic substrates have detrimental effects on cement setting, which is mostly seen by a delay in attaining the maximum temperature in the process. However, the addition of calcium chloride was able to overcome this disadvantage. Extraction of the substrates with some polar extraction agents before addition to the cement paste only slightly improved compatibility, and the addition of water-based extractives to a cement paste affects the setting much less than the lignocellulosic material by itself. Several thermal compatibility indices, including a new index proposed in this article, were calculated from data taken from temperature profiles, and conclusions are presented on the performance of the setting systems, as compared with a neat cement paste. In addition, comments are expressed on the level of accuracy offered by the indices applied in this study, and how such accuracy can be checked or improved by matching them to the physical properties of the wood-cement composites.

Key words

Wood Cork Cement Temperature profiles Compatibility indices 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Rashwan MS, Hatzinikolas M, Zmavc R (1992) Development of a lightweight, low-cost concrete block using wood residue. Forest Prod J 42:57–64Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ramirez-Coretti A, Eckelman CA, Wolfe RW (1998) Inorganic-bonded composite wood panel systems for low-cost housing: a Central American perspective. Forest Prod J 48:62–68Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hermawan D, Subiyanto B, Kawai S (2001) Manufacture and properties of oil palm frond cement-bonded board. J Wood Sci 47:208–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goodell B, Daniel G, Liu J, Mott L, Frank R (1997) Decay resistance and microscopic analysis of wood-cement composites. Forest Prod J 47:75–80Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wolfe RW, Gjinolli A (1999) Durability and strength of cement-bonded wood particle composites made from construction waste. Forest Prod J 49:24–31Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schmidt R, Marsh R, Balatinecz JJ, Cooper PA (1994) Increased wood-cement compatibility of chromated-treated wood. Forest Prod J 44:44–46Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hachmi M, Moslemi AA (1989) Correlation between wood-cement compatibility and wood extractives. Forest Prod J 39:55–58Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhengtian L, Moslemi AA (1986) Effect of western larch extractives on cement setting. Forest Prod J 36:53–54Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moslemi AA, Lim YT (1984) Compatibility of southern hard-woods with Portland cement. Forest Prod J 34:22–26Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sandermann W, Kohler R (1964) Studies on mineral-bonded wood materials. IV. A short test of the aptitudes of woods for cement-bonded materials. Holzforschung 18:53–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hofstrand AD, Moslemi AA, Garcia JF (1984) Curing characteristics of wood particles from nine northern Rocky Mountain species mixed with Portland cement. Forest Prod J 34:57–61Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Weatherwax RC, Tarkow H (1964) Effect of wood on setting of Portland cement. Forest Prod J 14:567–570Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hachmi M, Moslemi AA, Campbell AG (1990) A new technique to classify the compatibility of wood with cement. Wood Sci Technol 24:345–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Karade S, Irle RB, Maher K (2003) Assessment of wood-cement compatibility: a new approach. Holzforschung 57:672–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Semple KE, Cunningham RB, Evans PD (1999) Cement hydration tests using wood flour may not predict the suitability of Acacia mangium and Eucalyptus pellita for the manufacture of wood-wool cement boards. Holzforschung 53:327–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee AWC, Hong Z (1986) Compressive strength of cylindrical samples as an indicator of wood-cement compatibility. Forest Prod J 36:87–90Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wei YM, Zhou YG, Tomita B (2000) Hydration behavior of wood cement-based composite I: evaluation of wood species effects on compatibility and strength with ordinary Portland cement. J Wood Sci 46:296–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pereira C, Caldeira Jorge F, Irle MA, Ferreira JM (2003) Extractive contents of two woods and cork of Portuguese origin and the interaction of these substrates with cement suspensions. Forest Prod J 53:39–43Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pereira C, Caldeira Jorge F, Irle MA, Ferreira JM (2002) The interaction of calcium and other cations with lignocellulosic substrates, and their influence on cement setting. Proceedings of the 6th European Panel Products Symposium, Llandudno, North Wales, UK, 9–11 October 2002Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coutinho AS (1997) Manufacture and properties of concrete (in Portuguese). Vol. I. National Laboratory of Civil Engineering, LisbonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Japan Wood Research Society 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Catarina Pereira
    • 1
  • Fernando Caldeira Jorge
    • 2
  • Mark Irle
    • 3
  • José Maria Ferreira
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Ceramics and Glass Engineering — CICECOUniversity of AveiroAveiroPortugal
  2. 2.CEMAS — Centre of Modelling Studies and Environmental Systems AnalysisFernando Pessoa UniversityPortoPortugal
  3. 3.Ecole Supérieure du BoisCedex 3France

Personalised recommendations