Advertisement

Completeness of circle of Willis and white matter hyperintensities in patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis

  • Huirong Ye
  • Xiumei Wu
  • Jiangzhi Yan
  • Jian Wang
  • Jianting Qiu
  • Yujie WangEmail author
Original Article
  • 21 Downloads

Abstract

Background

We investigated whether completeness of the circle of Willis (CoW) protected patients with severe internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis against white matter hyperintensities (WMHs).

Methods

We included 115 patients with unilateral ICA stenosis ≥ 70%. The completeness of CoW was assessed and WMHs were rated on a visual scale. The score of deep and periventricular WMHs was compared between patients with complete and incomplete CoW and between the two hemispheres, ipsilateral and contralateral to stenosed ICA.

Results

We included 115 patients with severe ICA stenosis, 60 patients had a complete CoW (52.17%) and 55 had an incomplete CoW (47.83%). The patients with incomplete CoW had higher score of deep WMHs (OR = 1.82, 95% CI 1.08–3.06, P = 0.023) and periventricular WMHs (OR = 4.53, 95% CI 2.09–9.81, P = 0.000) than those with complete CoW. In the patients with incomplete CoW, the score of deep WMHs (OR = 4.14, 95% CI 1.33–12.93, P = 0.014) and periventricular WMHs (OR = 5.46, 95% CI 1.16–25.62, P = 0.032) was higher in the hemisphere ipsilateral to stenosed ICA than that in the contralateral hemisphere. In the patients with complete CoW, there was no significant difference in the score of deep WMHs (OR = 2.10, 95% CI 0.37–11.91, P = 0.401) and periventricular WMHs (OR = 2.83, 95% CI 0.99–8.05, P = 0.051) between the ipsilateral and contralateral hemispheres to stenosed ICA.

Conclusion

The completeness of CoW protected patients with severe ICA stenosis against WMHs.

Keywords

Circle of Willis White matter hyperintensities Internal carotid artery stenosis 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Vernooij MW, Ikram MA, Tanghe HL, Vincent AJ, Hofman A, Krestin GP, Niessen WJ, Breteler MM, van der Lugt A (2007) Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med 357:1821–1828CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith EE, Saposnik G, Biessels GJ, Doubal FN, Fornage M, Gorelick PB, Greenberg SM, Higashida RT, Kasner SE, Seshadri S, American Heart Association Stroke Council; Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; and Council on Hypertension (2017) Prevention of stroke in patients with silent cerebrovascular disease: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 48:e44–e71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Debette S, Markus HS (2010) The clinical importance of white matter hyperintensities on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 341:c3666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang WK, Liang HJ, Chen YK, Ahuja AT, Chu WCW, Mok VCT, Ungvari GS, Wong KS (2013) White matter hyperintensities and quality of life in acute lacunar stroke. Neurol Sci 34:1347–1353CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    The LADIS Study Group, Poggesi A, Pantoni L, Inzitari D, Fazekas F, Ferro J, O'Brien J, Hennerici M, Scheltens P, Erkinjuntti T, Visser M, Langhorne P, Chabriat H, Waldemar G, Wallin A, Wahlund A (2011) 2001-2011: a decade of the LADIS (Leukoaraiosis and disability) study: what have we learned about white matter changes and small-vessel disease? Cerebrovasc Dis 32:577–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ben-Assayag E, Mijajlovic M, Shenhar-Tsarfaty S, Bova I, Shopin L, Bornstein NM (2012) Leukoaraiosis is a chronic atherosclerotic disease. Sci World J 2012:6.  https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/532141
  7. 7.
    Ye H, Wang Y, Qiu J, Wu Q, Xu M, Wang J (2018) White matter hyperintensities and their subtypes in patients with carotid artery stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 8:e020830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Pascalis L, Montisci R, Mallarini G (2009) Carotid artery abnormalities and leukoaraiosis in elderly patients: evaluation with MDCT. Am J Roentgenol 192:W63–W70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Enzinger C, Ropele S, Gattringer T, Langkammer C, Schmidt R, Fazekas F (2010) High-grade internal carotid artery stenosis and chronic brain damage: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study. Cerebrovasc Dis 30:540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hoksbergen AW, Majoie CB, Hulsmans FJ, Legemate DA (2013) Assessment of the collateral function of the circle of Willis: three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography compared with transcranial color coded duplex sonography. Am J Neuroradiol 24:456–462Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adams HP Jr, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, Biller J, Love BB, Gordon DL, Marsh EE 3rd (1993) Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke 24:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim KW, MacFall JR, Payne ME (2008) Classification of white matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in elderly persons. Biol Psychiatry 64:273–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    King KS, Peshock RM, Warren MW, Alhilali L, Hulsey K, McColl R, Weiner MF, Ayers C, Whittemore A (2013) Evaluation of a practical visual MRI rating scale of brain white matter hyperintensities for clinicians based on largest lesion size regardless of location. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:797–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wardlaw JM, Smith EE, Biessels GJ, Cordonnier C, Fazekas F, Frayne R, Lindley RI, O'Brien JT, Barkhof F, Benavente OR, Black SE, Brayne C, Breteler M, Chabriat H, Decarli C, de Leeuw FE, Doubal F, Duering M, Fox NC, Greenberg S, Hachinski V, Kilimann I, Mok V, Oostenbrugge R, Pantoni L, Speck O, Stephan BC, Teipel S, Viswanathan A, Werring D, Chen C, Smith C, van Buchem M, Norrving B, Gorelick PB, Dichgans M, STandards for ReportIng Vascular changes on nEuroimaging (STRIVE v1) (2013) Neuroimaging standards for research into small vessel disease and its contribution to ageing and neurodegeneration. Lancet Neurol 12:822–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stock KW, Wetzel S, Kirsch E, Bongartz G, Steinbrich W, Radue EW (1996) Anatomic evaluation of the circle of Willis: MR angiography versus intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17:1495–1499PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Samuels OB, Joseph GJ, Lynn MJ, Smith HA, Chimowitz MI (2000) A standardized method for measuring intracranial arterial stenosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:643–646PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krabbe-Hartkamp MJ, van der Grond J, de Leeuw FE, de Groot JC, Algra A, Hillen B, Breteler MM, Mali WP (1998) Circle of Willis: morphologic variation on three-dimensional time-off light MR angiograms. Radiology 207:103–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kapoor K, Singh B, Dewan LI (2008) Variations in the configuration of the circle of Willis. Anat Sci Int 83:96–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zaninovich OA, Ramey WL, Walter CM, Dumont TM (2017) Completion of the circle of Willis varies by gender, age, and indication for computed tomography angiography. World Neurosurg 106:953–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Henderson RD, Eliasziw M, Fox AJ, Rothwell PM, Barnett HJ (2000) Angiographically defined collateral circulation and risk of stroke in patients with severe carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 31:128–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Miyazawa N, Shinohara T, Yamagata Z (2011) Association of incompleteness of the anterior part of the circle of Willis with the occurrence of lacunes in the basal ganglia. Eur J Neurol 18:1358–1360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chuang YM, Huang KL, Chang YJ, Chang CH, Chang TY, Wu TC, Lin CP, Wong HF, Liu SJ, Lee TH (2011) Associations between circle of Willis morphology and white matter lesion load in subjects with carotid artery stenosis. Eur Neurol 66:136–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Saba L, Raz E, Fatterpekar G, Montisci R, di Martino M, Bassareo PP, Piga M (2015) Correlation between leukoaraiosis volume and circle of Willis variants. J Neuroimaging 25:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Saba L, Sanfilippo R, Porcu M, Lucatelli P, Montisci R, Zaccagna F, Suri JS, Anzidei M, Wintermark M (2017) Relationship between white matter hyperintensities volume and the circle of Willis configurations in patients with carotid artery pathology. Eur J Radiol 89:111–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ren Y, Chen Q, Li ZY (2015) A 3D numerical study of the collateral capacity of the circle of Willis with anatomical variation in the posterior circulation. Biomed Eng Online 14:S11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ryan DJ, Byrne S, Dunne R, Harmon M, Harbison J (2015) White matter disease and an incomplete circle of Willis. Int J Stroke 10:547–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Li H, Xiong Y, Xu G, Zhang R, Zhu W, Yin Q, Ma M, Fan X, Yang F, Liu W, Duan Z, Liu X (2015) The circle of Willis and white matter lesions in patients with carotid atherosclerosis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 24:1749–1754CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hartkamp MJ, van Der Grond J, van Everdingen KJ, Hillen B, Mali WP (1999) Circle of Willis collateral flow investigated by magnetic resonance angiography. Stroke 30:2671–2678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hendrikse J, Eikelboom BC, van der Grond J (2002) Magnetic resonance angiography of collateral compensation in asymptomatic and symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 36:799–805CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Men X, Wu A, Zhang B, Li H, Zhang Z, Chen S, Lin Y, Lu Z (2013) Leukoaraiosis and NIHSS score help to differentiate subtypes of intracranial branch atheromatous disease in southern Han Chinese patients with stroke. Neurol Sci 34:1727–1733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wardlaw JM, Allerhand M, Doubal FN, Valdes Hernandez M, Morris Z, Gow AJ, Bastin M, Starr JM, Dennis MS, Deary IJ (2014) Vascular risk factors, large-artery atheroma, and brain white matter hyperintensities. Neurology 82:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Fondazione Società Italiana di Neurologia 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cerebrovascular Disease Center, Department of Neurology, People’s HospitalChina Medical UniversityShenyangPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations