Advertisement

Neurological Sciences

, Volume 39, Issue 12, pp 2079–2084 | Cite as

Performance of the COMPASS-31 questionnaire with regard to autonomic nervous system testing results and medication use: a prospective study in a real-life setting

  • Berislav Ruška
  • Tin Pavičić
  • Ivan Pavlović
  • Anamari Junaković
  • Ivan Adamec
  • Luka Crnošija
  • Magdalena Krbot Skorić
  • Mario Habek
Original Article
  • 42 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the Composite Autonomic System Score-31 (COMPASS-31) questionnaire in a real-life setting in consecutive patients referred to the laboratory for objective testing of the autonomic nervous system (ANS), with the hypothesis that COMPASS-31 results differ depending on medications and findings of the tilt table test results. One hundred seventy-one consecutive patients (125 females, mean age 41.5 ± 19.3) referred for testing of the ANS were enrolled. Before testing, all patients completed the recently validated Croatian version of COMPASS-31. The following data were systematically collected for all patients: age, sex, diagnoses, and medications. Results of COMPASS-31 were significantly higher in patients taking medications with a known influence on the ANS (p < 0.001). Patients with postural orthostatic tachycardia had significantly higher orthostatic intolerance and vasomotor domains of COMPASS-31 (p = 0.048 and p = 0.022, respectively). Patients with a cardiovagal score ≥ 1 had a significantly higher vasomotor domain of COMPASS-31 compared to patients with normal results of ANS tests (p = 0.030). These findings suggest the COMPASS-31 might be a valuable screening tool for autonomic dysfunctions, as it is associated with impaired ANS tests, but usage of medications that modify the ANS should always be taken into account.

Keywords

Autonomic nervous system COMPASS-31 Medications 

Notes

Authors’ contributions

Study concept and design: Junaković, Habek. Acquisition of data: Pavičić, Ruška, Pavlović, Junaković, Adamec, Crnošija, Krbot Skorić, Habek. Analysis and interpretation of data: Pavičić, Ruška, Pavlović, Junaković, Adamec, Crnošija, Krbot Skorić, Habek. Drafting of the manuscript: Pavičić, Ruška, Pavlović. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Pavičić, Ruška, Pavlović, Junaković, Adamec, Crnošija, Krbot Skorić, Habek. Administrative, technical, and material support: Pavičić, Ruška, Pavlović, Junaković, Adamec, Crnošija, Krbot Skorić, Habek.

Compliance with ethical standards

All patients signed an informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Hospital Center Zagreb.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Sletten DM, Suarez GA, Low PA, Mandrekar J, Singer W (2012) COMPASS-31: a refined and abbreviated Composite Autonomic Symptom Score. Mayo Clin Proc 87:1196–1201CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drulović J, Gavrilović A, Crnošija L, Kisić-Tepavčević D, Krbot Skorić M, Ivanović J, Adamec I, Dujmović I, Junaković A, Marić G, Martinović V, Pekmezović T, Habek M (2017) Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the COMPASS-31 in Croatian and Serbian patients with multiple sclerosis. Croat Med J 58:342–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Treister R, O'Neil K, Downs HM, Oaklander AL (2015) Validation of the composite autonomic symptom scale 31 (COMPASS-31) in patients with and without small fiber polyneuropathy. Eur J Neurol 22:1124–1130CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kang JH, Kim JK, Hong SH, Lee CH, Choi BY (2016) Heart rate variability for quantification of autonomic dysfunction in fibromyalgia. Ann Rehabil Med 40:301–309CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim Y, Seok JM, Park J, Kim K-H, Min J-H, Cho JW, Park S, Kim HJ, Kim BJ, Youn J (2017) The composite autonomic symptom scale 31 is a useful screening tool for patients with Parkinsonism. PLoS One 12:e0180744CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Greco C, Di Gennaro F, D'Amato C, Morganti R, Corradini D, Sun A, Longo S, Lauro D, Pierangeli G, Cortelli P, Spallone V (2017) Validation of the Composite Autonomic Symptom Score 31 (COMPASS 31) for the assessment of symptoms of autonomic neuropathy in people with diabetes. Diabet Med 34:834–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rea NA, Campbell CL, Cortez MM (2017) Quantitative assessment of autonomic symptom burden in postural tachycardia syndrome (POTS). J Neurol Sci 377:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vieira B, Costa A, Videira G, Sá MJ, Abreu P (2015) Prevalence of autonomic dysfunction in patients with multiple sclerosis. Acta Medica Port 28:51–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cortez MM, Nagi Reddy SK, Goodman B, Carter JL, Wingerchuk DM (2015) Autonomic symptom burden is associated with MS-related fatigue and quality of life. Mult Scler Relat Disord 4:258–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adamec I, Mišmaš A, Zaper D, Junaković A, Hajnšek S, Habek M (2013) Short pain-provoked head-up tilt test for the confirmation of vasovagal syncope. Neurol Sci 34:869–873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Novak P (2011) Quantitative autonomic testing. J Vis Exp 53:e2502Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Low PA (1993) Composite autonomic scoring scale for laboratory quantification of generalized autonomic failure. Mayo Clin Proc 68:748–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freeman R, Wieling W, Axelrod FB, Benditt DG, Benarroch E, Biaggioni I, Cheshire WP, Chelimsky T, Cortelli P, Gibbons CH, Goldstein DS, Hainsworth R, Hilz MJ, Jacob G, Kaufmann H, Jordan J, Lipsitz LA, Levine BD, Low PA, Mathias C, Raj SR, Robertson D, Sandroni P, Schatz I, Schondorff R, Stewart JM, van Dijk JG (2011) Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome. Clin Auton Res 21:69–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    De Wandele I, Rombaut L, Leybaert L, Van de Borne P, De Backer T, Malfait F, De Paepe A, Calders P (2014) Dysautonomia and its underlying mechanisms in the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Semin Arthritis Rheum 44:93–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Suarez GA, Opfer-Gehrking TL, Offord KP, Atkinson EJ, O'Brien PC, Low PA (1999) The Autonomic Symptom Profile: a new instrument to assess autonomic symptoms. Neurology 52:523–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arbogast SD, Alshekhlee A, Hussain Z, McNeeley K, Chelimsky TC (2009) Hypotension unawareness in profound orthostatic hypotension. Am J Med 122:574–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  2. 2.Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System Disorders, Department of NeurologyUniversity Hospital Center ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Faculty of Electrical Engineering and ComputingUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations