Neurological Sciences

, Volume 39, Issue 8, pp 1333–1343 | Cite as

A novel device for continuous monitoring of tremor and other motor symptoms

  • Luigi BattistaEmail author
  • Antonietta Romaniello
Original Article


The clinical assessment of Parkinson’s disease (PD) symptoms is typically performed with neurological examinations and simple motor tests. However, this only takes into account the severity of motor symptoms during the length of the recording and fails to capture variations in a patient’s motor state, which change continuously during the day. Most of the current methods for long-term monitoring of extrapyramidal symptoms are based on the use of a wearable magneto-inertial device that evaluates the frequential content of signals in the range of movement disorders. However, the typical daily motor activities performed by patients may have a power spectrum into the same range of motor symptoms, and habitual activity may be indistinguishable from that due to movement disorders. In this work, we report a new device and method for the continuous and long-term monitoring of tremor due to PD and other movement disorders to reduce the probability of mistaking the discrimination between extrapyramidal symptoms and normal daily activity. The method is based on the evaluation of frequential data content from multi-axial sensors and on the identification of specific movement patterns that Parkinsonian and extrapyramidal symptoms are typically associated with. In this study, 16 patients with movement disorders were recruited. While results need to be extended with further studies and clinical trials, the proposed device appears promising and suitable for the use as part of clinical trials and routine clinical practice for supporting the evaluation of motor symptoms, disease progression, and the quantification of therapeutic effects


Parkinson’s disease Accelerometer Wearable technology Neurophysiology Movement disorders 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Eng. Luigi Battista is the inventor and, to date, holds intellectual property rights of an Italian patent and has filed for a patent related to a wearable system for Parkinson’s disease. Dr. Antonietta Romaniello has nothing to disclose.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Supplementary material

10072_2018_3414_MOESM1_ESM.docx (2 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 2009 kb)


  1. 1.
    Pringsheim T, Jette N, Frolkis A, Steeves TD (2014) The prevalence of Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mov Disord 29:1583–1590CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    de Lau LML, Breteler MMB (2006) Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 5:525–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    von Campenhausen S, Bornschein B, Wick R, Bötzel K, Sampaio C, Poewe W, Oertel W, Siebert U, Berger K, Dodel R (2005) Prevalence and incidence of Parkinson’s disease in Europe. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 15:473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Appollonio I, Trabucchi M (2012) Il Parkinson, Bologna, il Mulino, pp1–102Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guttman M, Kish SJ, Furukawa Y (2003) Current concepts in the diagnosis and management of Parkinson’s disease. Canadian Med Association J 168:293–301Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janckovic J (2008) Parkinson’s disease: clinical features and diagnosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 79:368–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krack P, Martinez-Fernandez R, Del Alamo M, Obeso JA (2017) Current applications and limitations of surgical treatments for movement disorders. Mov Disord 32:36–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ughratdar I, Samuel M, Ashkan K (2015) Technological advances in deep brain stimulation. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease 5:483–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kleiner A, Galli M, Gaglione M, Hildebrand D, Sale P, Albertini G, Stocchi F, De Pandis MF (2015) The parkinsonian gait spatiotemporal parameters quantified by a single inertial sensor before and after automated mechanical peripheral stimulation treatment. Parkinson’s Disease 2015:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diaz AP, Freitas FC, de Oliveira Thais ME, da Silva Areas FZ, Schwarzbold ML, Debona R, Nunes JC, Guarnieri R, Martinez-Ramirez D, Prediger RD, Wagle Shukla A, Linhares MN, Walz R (2016) Variables associated with physical health-related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease patients presenting for deep brain stimulation. Neurol Sci 37:1831–1837CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lopiano L, Modugno N, Marano P, Sensi M, Meco G, Cannas A, Gusmaroli G, Tamma F, Mancini F, Quatrale R, Costanzo AM, Gualberti G, Melzi G, di Luzio PU, Antonini A (2016) Motor outcomes in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease treated with levodopa/carbidopa intestinal gel in Italy: an interim analysis from the GREENFIELD observational study. Neurol Sci 37:1785–1792CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keijsers NL, Horstink MW, Gielen SC (2003) Automatic assessment of levodopa-induced dyskinesias in daily life by neural networks. Mov Disord 18:70–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dunnewold RJ, Jacobi CE, van Hilten JJ (1997) Quantitative assessment of bradykinesia in patients with Parkinson’s disease. J Neurosci Methods 74:107–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barroso Júnior MC, Esteves GP, Nunes TP, Silva LM, Faria ACD, Melo PL (2011) A telemedicine instrument for remote evaluation of tremor: design and initial applications in fatigue and patients with Parkinson’s disease. Biomed Eng Online 10:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Brown RG, MacCarthy B, Jahanshahi M, Marsden CD (1989) Accuracy of self reported disability in patients with parkinsonism. Arch Neuro 46:955–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang M, Sheu Y, Shin J, Young MS (2003) Portable tremor monitor system for real-time full-wave monitoring and analysis. Rev Sci Instr 74:1303–1309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zwartjes DGM, Heida T, van Vugt JPP, Geelen JAG, Veltink PH (2010) Ambulatory monitoring of activities and motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 57:2778–2786CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    van Someren EJ, van Gool WA, Vonk BF, Mirmiran M (1993) Ambulatory monitoring of tremor and other movements before and after thalamotomy: a new quantitative technique. J Neurol Sci 11:16–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Van Hilten JJ (1993) Quantitative assessment of parkinsonian patients by continuous wrist activity monitoring. Clin Neuropharmacol 16:36–45CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pan D, Dhall R, Lieberman A, Petitti DB (2015) A mobile cloud-based Parkinson’s disease assessment system for home-based monitoring. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 3:e29CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Griffiths RI, Horne MK (2008) Detection of hypokinetic and/or hyperkinetic states. European patent N. EP2674104 B1Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giuffrida J (2005) Movement disorder monitoring system and method US Patent N 8679038 B1Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    McNames J, Aboy PMR, Greenberg A (2008) Method and apparatus for continuous measurement of motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease and essential tremor with wearable sensors US Patent N US 9301712 B2Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    di Biase L, Brittain JS, Shah SA, Pedrosa DJ, Cagnan H (2017) Tremor stability index: a new tool for differential diagnosis in tremor syndromes. Brain 140:1977–1986CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wile DJ, Ranawaya R, Kiss ZH (2014) Smart watch accelerometry for analysis and diagnosis of tremor. J Neurosci Methods 230:1–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Maremmani C, Bongioanni P, Cavallo F, Esposito D, Rovini E, Aquilano M, Carrozza MC, Dario P (2013) Preliminary evaluation of Sensorfoot V1 and Senshand V1 in assessing motor skills performance of Parkinson’s disease patients. Journal of the Neurological Science 333:e67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Battista L, Scorza A, Sciuto SA (2012) Experimental characterization of a novel fiber-optic accelerometer for the quantitative assessment of rest tremor in parkinsonian patients. Proceedings of the 9th IASTED international conference of biomedical engineering, 437–442Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Espay AJ, Bonato P, Nahab FB, Maetzler W, Dean JM, Klucken J, Eskofier BM, Merola A, Horak F, Lang AE, Reilmann R, Giuffrida J, Nieuwboer A, Horne M, Little MA, Litvan I, Simuni T, Dorsey ER, Burack MA, Kubota K, Kamondi A, Godinho C, Daneault J, Mitsi G, Krinke L, Hausdorff JM, Bloem BR, Papapetropoulos S (2016) Technology in Parkinson disease: challenges and opportunities. Mov Disord 31:1272–1282CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Godinho C, Domingos J, Cunha G, Santos AT (2016) A systematic review of the characteristics and validity of monitoring technologies to assess Parkinson’s disease. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 13:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cai G, Huang Y, Luo S, Lin Z, Dai H, Ye Q (2017) Continuous quantitative monitoring of physical activity in Parkinson’s disease patients by using wearable devices: a case-control study. Neurol Sci 38:1657–1663CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Pahwa R, Lyons KE, Koller WC (2003) Handbook of Parkinson’s disease, III edition. New York, Mercel Dekker Inc., chapter 4Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    van Emmerik REA, Wagenaar RG (1996) Dynamics of movement coordination and tremor during gait in Parkinson’s disease. Hum Mov Sci 15:203–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Manson AJ, Brown P, O'Sullivan JD, Asselman P (2000) An ambulatory dyskinesia monitor. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:196–201CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mathie MJ, Coster AC, Lovell NH, Celler BG (2004) Accelerometry providing an integrated practical method for long term ambulatory monitoring of human movement. Physiol Meas 25:R1–R20CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Battista L (2017) Portable system for recording and remote monitoring of Parkinsonian tremor. Italian Patent N U283061Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Battista L (2017) A device and associate method to assess the extrapyramidal symptoms, in particular the motor symptoms of the Parkinson’s disease. PCT and Italian Patent Application N 102017000035240Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Fawcett T (2006) An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recogn Lett 27:861–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia S.r.l., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine and SurgeryCatholic University of the Sacred HeartPotenzaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neurosurgery, Neurology UnitHospital of Potenza “San Carlo”PotenzaItaly

Personalised recommendations