Skip to main content
Log in

Did Antonio Vallisneri (1661–1730) really describe frontal sinus osteoma? Unexpected insights for paleo-neuroparasitology

  • Brief Communication
  • Published:
Neurological Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 01 December 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

It has been believed for a long time that the Paduan scholar Antonio Vallisneri (1661–1730) described the second historical case of the frontal sinus osteoma in 1733. By historico-medically reexamining this case, we conclude that the brain concretions he described were not a case of frontal sinus osteoma, while they appear to have been pathological outcomes of neurocysticercosis, whose larval stages would only be described by Johann Goeze (1731–1793) later, in 1784. Thus, this case becomes relevant for the history of neuroparasitology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Change history

  • 01 December 2018

    The third sentence from the beginning in our article.

References

  1. Lentine J, Saeed Y (1960) Osteoma of the paranasal sinuses. Arch Otolaryngol 72:722–733

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mali SB (2014) Paranasal sinus osteoma: review of literature. Oral Surg 7:3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lagrange F (1904) Traitè des tumeurs de l’oeil, de l’orbite et des annexes. G. Steinheil, Paris, vol. 2, p. 316

  4. Tedd W (1941) Primary osteoma of the frontal sinus. Arch Otolaryngol 33:255–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vallisneri A (1709) Considerazioni, ed esperienze intorno al creduto cervello di bue impietrito, vivente ancor l’animale. Nella Stamperia del Seminario, Padua

    Google Scholar 

  6. Du Verney J-G (1703) Sur un cerveau pétrifié. In: Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences, 2nd edn. Chez Charles-Estienne Hochereau, Paris, pp 26–28

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lopes WD, Santos TR, Soares VE et al (2011) Preferential infection sites of Cysticercus bovis in cattle experimentally infected with Taenia saginata eggs. Res Vet Sci 90:84–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cox FEG (2002) History of human parasitology. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:595–612

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. García HH, Gonzales AE, Evans AWE et al (2003) Taenia solium cysticercosis. Lancet 362:547–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goeze JAE (1784) Neueste Entdeckung: daß die Finnen im Schweinefleisch keine Drüsenkrankheit, sondern wahre Blasenwürmer sind

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Elena Varotto or Fabio Zampieri.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical statement

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Galassi, F.M., Varotto, E., Zanatta, A. et al. Did Antonio Vallisneri (1661–1730) really describe frontal sinus osteoma? Unexpected insights for paleo-neuroparasitology. Neurol Sci 39, 1275–1277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3312-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-018-3312-7

Keywords

Navigation