Advertisement

Neurological Sciences

, Volume 38, Issue 8, pp 1469–1483 | Cite as

SAND: a Screening for Aphasia in NeuroDegeneration. Development and normative data

  • Eleonora Catricalà
  • Elena Gobbi
  • Petronilla Battista
  • Antonio Miozzo
  • Cristina Polito
  • Veronica Boschi
  • Valentina Esposito
  • Sofia Cuoco
  • Paolo Barone
  • Sandro Sorbi
  • Stefano F. Cappa
  • Peter Garrard
Original Article

Abstract

Language assessment has a critical role in the clinical diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases, in particular, in the case of Primary Progressive Aphasia (PPA). The current diagnostic criteria (Gorno-Tempini et al., 2011) identify three main variants on the basis of clinical features and patterns of brain atrophy. Widely accepted tools to diagnose, clinically classify, and follow up the heterogeneous language profiles of PPA are still lacking. In this study, we develop a screening battery, composed of nine tests (picture naming, word and sentence comprehension, word and sentence repetition, reading, semantic association, writing and picture description), following the recommendations of current diagnostic guidelines and taking into account recent research on the topic. All tasks were developed with consideration of the psycholinguistic factors that can affect performance, with the aim of achieving sensitivity to the language deficit to which each task was relevant, and to allow identification of the selective characteristic impairments of each PPA variant. Normative data on 134 Italian subjects pooled across homogeneous subgroups for age, sex, and education are reported. Although further work is still needed, this battery represents a first step towards a concise multilingual standard language examination, a fast and simple tool to help clinicians and researchers in the diagnosis of PPA.

Keywords

Language assessment Neurodegenerative diseases Normative data Primary progressive aphasia Screening battery Aphasia 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Cristiano Chesi for his helpful comments in the construction of sentence comprehension task, Caterina Balduzzi for her help in collecting controls’ data and in scoring, and Monica Consonni and Laura Sampietro for their assistance in data management. This study was supported by the MRC Research Grant: Ref MR/N025881/1.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Goodglass, H., Barresi, B., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Lippincott Williams & Willkins. A Wolters Kluwer Company.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goodglass H, Kaplan E, Weintraub S (1983) Boston naming test. Lee & Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mesulam MM, Weintraub S (1992) Spectrum of primary progressive aphasia. Baillieres Clin Neurol 1(3):583–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gorno-Tempini ML, Hillis A, Weintraub S et al (2011) Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology 76:1006–1014CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Weintraub S, Mesulam MM, Wieneke C, Rademaker A, Rogalski EJ, Thompson CK (2009) The northwestern anagram test: measuring sentence production in primary progressive aphasia. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Other Demen 24(5):408–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilson SM, Dronkers NF, Ogar JM, Jang J, Growdon ME, Agosta F et al (2010a) Neural correlates of syntactic processing in the nonfluent variant of primary progressive aphasia. J Neurosci 30(50):16845–16854CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Billette OV, Sajjadi SA, Patterson K, Nestor PJ (2015) SECT and MAST: new tests to assess grammatical abilities in primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology 29(10):1135–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hodges JR, Martinosa M, Woollamsa AM, Pattersona K, Adlama A-LR (2008) Repeat and point: differentiating semantic dementia from progressive non-fluent aphasia. Cortex 44:1265–1270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Savage S, Hsieh S, Leslie F, Foxe D, Piguet O, Hodges JR (2013) Distinguishing subtypes in primary progressive aphasia: application of the Sydney language battery. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 35:208–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boschi V, Catricalà E, Consonni M, Chesi C, Moro A, Cappa SF (2017) Connected speech in neurodegenerative language disorders: a review. Front Psychol 6(8):269. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00269
  11. 11.
    Mesulam MM, Wieneke C, Hurley R, Rademaker A, Thompson CK, Weintraub S, Rogalski EJ (2013) Words and objects at the tip of the left temporal lobe in primary progressive aphasia. Brain 136(2):601–618CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Teichmann M, Kas A, Boutet C, Ferrieux S, Nogues M, Samri D, Rogan C, Dormont D, Dubois B, Migliaccio R (2013) Deciphering logopenic primary progressive aphasia: a clinical, imaging and biomarker investigation. Brain 136:3474–3488CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sajjadi SA, Patterson K, Nestor PJ (2014) Logopenic, mixed, or Alzheimer-related aphasia? Neurology 82(13):1127–1131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leyton CE, Hodges GR, McLean CA, Kril JJ, Piguet O, Ballard KJ (2015) Is the logopenic-variant of primary progressive aphasia a unitary disorder? Cortex 67:122–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Whitwell JL, Duffy JR, Strand EA, Machulda MM, Senjem ML, Schwarz CG et al (2015) Clinical and neuroimaging biomarkers of amyloid-negative logopenic primary progressive aphasia. Brain Lang 142:45–53CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matías-Guiu JA, Cabrera-Martín MN, Moreno-Ramos T, Valles-Salgado M, Fernandez-Matarrubia M, Carreras JL, Matías-Guiu J (2015) Amyloid and FDG-PET study of logopenic primary progressive aphasia: evidence for the existence of two subtypes. J Neurol 262(6):1463–1472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Catricalá E, Della Rosa PA, Ginex V, Mussetti Z, Plebani V, Cappa SF (2013) An Italian battery for the assessment of semantic memory disorders. Neurol Sci 34(6):985–993CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luzzatti C, Willmes K, De Bleser R (1994) Aachener aphasia test (AAT)—Versione Italiana. Organizzazioni Speciali, Firenze, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miceli G, Laudanna A, Burani C, Capasso R (1994) Batteria per l’analisi dei deficit afasici. CEPSAG, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, RomaGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2001). Esame Neuropsicologico per l’Afasia: ENPA (Vol. 4). Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Garrard P, Ahmed S (2012) An abbreviated examination for the assessment of linguistic impairment in primary progressive aphasia. Eur J Neurol 19:561Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bates E, Federmeier K, Herron D, Iyer G et al (2000) Introducing the CRL international picture-naming project (CRL-IPNP). Center for Research in Language, University of California, San Diego 12 (1).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Mauro T, Mancini F, Vedovelli M, Voghera M (1993) Lessico di frequenza dell’italiano parlato (LIP). Etaslibri, MilanGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bertinetto, P. M., Burani, C., Laudanna, A., Marconi, L., Ratti, D., Rolando, C., & Thornton, A. M. (2005). Corpus e lessico di frequenza dell’italiano scritto (CoLFIS). Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Romani C, Galluzzi C (2005) Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cogn Neuropsychol 22:817–850CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Goslin J, Galluzzi C, Romani C (2013) PhonItalia: a phonological lexicon for Italian. Behav Res 45Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Colombo L, Brivio C, Benaglio I, Siri S, Cappa SF (2000) Alzheimer patients’ ability to read words with irregular stress. Cortex 36:703–714CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Graham NL, Patterson K, Hodges JR (2004) When more yields less: speaking and writing deficits in nonfluent progressive aphasia. Neurocase 10(2):141–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Code C, Muller N, Tree J, Ball M (2006) Syntactic impairments can emerge later: progressive agrammatic agraphia and syntactic comprehension impairment. Aphasiology 20(9):1035–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Heitkamp N, Schumacher R, Croot K, de Langen EG, Monsch AU, Baumann T, Danek A (2016) A longitudinal linguistic analysis of written text production in a case of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia. J Neurolinguistics 39:26–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jensen AM, Chenery HJ, Copland DA (2006) A comparison of picture description abilities in individuals with vascular subcortical lesions and Huntington’s disease. J Commun Disord 39(1):162–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Croisile B, Ska B, Brabant MJ, Duchene A, Lepage Y, Aimard G, Trillet M (1996) Comparative Study of oral and written picture description in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Brain Lang 53(1):1–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Measso G, Cavarzevan F, Zappalà G et al (1993) II Mini-Mental-State Examination: studio normativo di un campione random della popolazione Italiana. Dev Neuropsychol 9:77–85.3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Capitani E (1987) Statistical methods. In: Spinnler H, Rognoni G (eds) Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Ital J Neurol Sci 6(Suppl. 8)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Capitani E, Laiacona M (1997) Composite neuropsychological batteries and demographic correction: standardization based on equivalent scores, with a review of published data. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 19(6):795–809CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cerami, C., & Cappa, S. F. (2016). Primary progressive aphasia. Hodges’ Frontotemporal Dementia.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Catricalà E, Della Rosa PA, Plebani V, Vigliocco G, Cappa SF (2014) Abstract and concrete categories? Evidences from neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropsychologia 64:271–281CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Catricalà E, Della Rosa PA, Plebani V, Perani D, Garrard P, Cappa SF (2015) Semantic feature degradation and naming performance. Evidence from neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Lang 147:58–65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Brambati SM, Ogar J, Neuhaus J, Miller BL, Gorno-Tempini ML (2009) Reading disorders in primary progressive aphasia: a behavioral and neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 47(8):1893–1900CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Binney RJ, Henry ML, Babiak M, Pressman PS, Santos-Santos MA, Narvid J et al (2016) Reading words and other people: a comparison of exception word, familiar face and affect processing in the left and right temporal variants of primary progressive aphasia. Cortex 82:147–163CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Henry, M. L., Wilson, S. M., Babiak, M. C., Mandelli, M. L., Beeson, P. M., Miller, Z. A., & Gorno-Tempini, M. L. (2015). Phonological processing in primary progressive aphasia. Journal of cognitive neuroscience.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Thompson CK, Mack JE (2014) Grammatical impairments in PPA. Aphasiology 28(8–9):1018–1037CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wilson SM, Henry ML, Besbris M et al (2010b) Connected speech production in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Brain 133:2069–2088CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ash S, Evans E, O’Shea J, Powers J, Boller A, Weinberg D, Grossman M et al (2013) Differentiating primary progressive aphasias in a brief sample of connected speech. Neurology 81(4):329–336CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Ash S, Grossman M (2015) Why study connected speech production? In Willems, R. M. (Ed.). Cognitive neuroscience of natural language use. Cambridge University Press, 29–58.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Fraser KC, Meltzer JA, Graham NL, Leonard C, Hirst G, Black SE, Rochon E (2014a) Automated classification of primary progressive aphasia subtypes from narrative speech transcripts. Cortex 55:43–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Fraser KC, Ben-David N, Hirst G, Graham N, Rochon E. (2015b). Sentence segmentation of aphasic speech. In HLT-NAACL (pp. 862–871).Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Fraser KC, Hirst G, Meltzer JA, Mack JE, Thompson CK (2014b) Using statistical parsing to detect agrammatic aphasia. ACL 2014:134Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sajjadi SA, Patterson K, Tomek M, Nestor PJ (2012b) Abnormalities of connected speech in the non-semantic variants of primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology 26(10):1219–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sajjadi SA, Patterson K, Tomek M, Nestor PJ (2012a) Abnormalities of connected speech in semantic dementia vs Alzheimer’s disease. Aphasiology 26(6):847–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Knibb JA, Woollams AM, Hodges JR, Patterson K (2009) Making sense of progressive non-fluent aphasia: an analysis of conversational speech. Brain 132(10):2734–2746CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jarrold W, Peintner B, Wilkins D, Vergryi D, Richey C, Gorno-Tempini ML, Ogar J (2014) Aided diagnosis of dementia type through computer-based analysis of spontaneous speech. ACL 2014:27Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Meteyard L, Patterson K (2009) The relation between content and structure in language production: An analysis of speech errors in semantic dementia. Brain Lang 110(3):121–134CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kertesz A, McMonagle P (2010) Behavior and cognition in corticobasal degeneration and progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Sci 289:138–143CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Kertesz A, McMonagle P, Blair M, Davidson W, Munoz DG (2005) The evolution and pathology of frontotemporal dementia. Brain 128(9):1996–2005CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hodges JR, Davies RR, Xuereb JH, Casey B, Broe M, Bak TH, Kril JJ, Halliday GM (2004) Clinicopathological correlates in frontotemporal dementia. Ann Neurol 56(3):399–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Josephs KA, Petersen RC, Knopman DS, Boeve BF, Whitwell JL, Duffy JR, Parisi JE, Dickson DW (2006) Clinicopathologic analysis of frontotemporal and corticobasal degenerations and PSP. Neurology 66(1):41–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Rittman T, Ghosh BC, McColgan P, Breen DP, Evans J, Williams-Gray CH, Barker RA, Rowe JB (2013) The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination for the differential diagnosis and longitudinal assessment of patients with parkinsonian disorders. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84:544–551CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Josephs KA, Duffy JR, Strand EA, Machulda MM, Senjem ML, Gunter JL et al (2014) The evolution of primary progressive apraxia of speech. Brain 137(Pt 10):2783–2795CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eleonora Catricalà
    • 1
  • Elena Gobbi
    • 2
  • Petronilla Battista
    • 1
    • 3
    • 4
  • Antonio Miozzo
    • 5
  • Cristina Polito
    • 6
  • Veronica Boschi
    • 1
  • Valentina Esposito
    • 2
  • Sofia Cuoco
    • 7
  • Paolo Barone
    • 7
  • Sandro Sorbi
    • 4
  • Stefano F. Cappa
    • 1
    • 8
  • Peter Garrard
    • 9
  1. 1.NEtSScuola Universitaria Superiore IUSS—PaviaPaviaItalia
  2. 2.Università Vita-Salute San RaffaeleMilanoItalia
  3. 3.Unità di Malattie Neurodegenerative, Dipartimento di medicina di base, neuroscienze e organi del sensoUniversità di Bari Aldo MoroBariItalia
  4. 4.NEUROFARBA- Dipartimento di Neuroscienze, Psicologia, Area del Farmaco e Salute del BambinoUniversità di FirenzeFirenzeItalia
  5. 5.Unità di Neurologia, Dipartimento di scienze cliniche e sperimentaliUniversità di BresciaBresciaItalia
  6. 6.SBSC - Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Sperimentali e ClinicheUniversità di FirenzeFirenzeItalia
  7. 7.Facoltà di Medicina e ChirurgiaUniversità degli Studi di SalernoFiscianoItalia
  8. 8.IRCCS S. Giovanni di Dio FatebenefratelliBresciaItalia
  9. 9.Neuroscience Research CentreSt George’s—University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations