Neurological Sciences

, Volume 38, Issue 5, pp 797–810 | Cite as

Mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours: a systematic review of association between study quality, source of funding, and research outcomes

  • Manya PrasadEmail author
  • Prachi Kathuria
  • Pallavi Nair
  • Amit Kumar
  • Kameshwar Prasad
Original Article


Mobile phones emit electromagnetic radiations that are classified as possibly carcinogenic to humans. Evidence for increased risk for brain tumours accumulated in parallel by epidemiologic investigations remains controversial. This paper aims to investigate whether methodological quality of studies and source of funding can explain the variation in results. PubMed and Cochrane CENTRAL searches were conducted from 1966 to December 2016, which was supplemented with relevant articles identified in the references. Twenty-two case control studies were included for systematic review. Meta-analysis of 14 case–control studies showed practically no increase in risk of brain tumour [OR 1.03 (95% CI 0.92–1.14)]. However, for mobile phone use of 10 years or longer (or >1640 h), the overall result of the meta-analysis showed a significant 1.33 times increase in risk. The summary estimate of government funded as well as phone industry funded studies showed 1.07 times increase in odds which was not significant, while mixed funded studies did not show any increase in risk of brain tumour. Metaregression analysis indicated that the association was significantly associated with methodological study quality (p < 0.019, 95% CI 0.009–0.09). Relationship between source of funding and log OR for each study was not statistically significant (p < 0.32, 95% CI 0.036–0.010). We found evidence linking mobile phone use and risk of brain tumours especially in long-term users (≥10 years). Studies with higher quality showed a trend towards high risk of brain tumour, while lower quality showed a trend towards lower risk/protection.


Mobile phones Risk Brain tumour Metaregression Meta-analysis 



The authors would like to thank All India Institute of Medical Sciences for providing us the resources for conducting the meta-analysis successfully.

Author contributions

KP supervised the study. MP and PK screened the papers on inclusion and exclusion criteria followed by data extraction. They also appraised the methodological quality of the retrieved studies. Data analysis was carried out by KP, PK, MP, and AK. Drafting of manuscript was done by KP, PK, and MP. PN, PK, and MP were involved in the formulation of tables. They were also involved in reviewing the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content. All authors read the final manuscript, and approval was given by KP.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

Supplementary material

10072_2017_2850_MOESM1_ESM.doc (346 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 345 kb)


  1. 1.
    GSMA (2016) Mobile economy 2016. Accessed 15 Jan 2017
  2. 2.
    WHO (2017) Electromagnetic fields and public health: mobile phones. Accessed 17 Jan 2017
  3. 3.
    Hardell L, Näsman A, Påhlson A, Hallquist A, Hansson K (1999) Mild, “use of cellular telephones and the risk for brain tumours: a case–control study”. Int J Oncol 15(1):113–116PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Muscat JE et al (2000) Handheld cellular telephone use and risk of brain cancer. J Am Med Assoc (JAMA) 284(23):3001–3007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Inskip PD et al (2001) Cellular-telephone use and brain tumors. N Engl J Med 344(2):79–86CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson K (2005) Mild, “case–control study on cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for acoustic neuroma or meningioma in patients diagnosed 2000–2003”. Neuroepidemiology 25(3):120–128CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Schoemaker MJ et al (2005) Mobile phone use and risk of acoustic neuroma: results of the interphone case–control study in five North European countries. Br J Cancer 93(7):842–848CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Mild KH (2006) Case–control study of the association between the use of cellular and cordless telephones and malignant brain tumors diagnosed during 2000–2003. Environ Res 100(2):232–241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Warren HG, Prevatt AA, Daly KA, Antonelli PJ (2003) Cellular telephone use and risk of intratemporal facial nerve tumor. Laryngoscope 113(4):663–667CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, Feychting M, Swedish Interphone Study Group (2005) Long-term mobile phone use and brain tumor risk. Am J Epidemiol 161(6):526–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Takebayashi T et al (2006) Mobile phone use and acoustic neuroma risk in Japan. Occup Environ Med 63(12):802–807CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hours M et al (2007) Cell phones and risk of brain and acoustic nerve tumours: the French INTERPHONE case–control study. Rev Dépidémiol Santé Publique 55(5):321–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lahkola A et al (2007) Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in 5 North European countries. Int J Cancer 120(8):1769–1775CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lahkola A et al (2008) Meningioma and mobile phone use—a collaborative case-control study in five North European countries. Int J Epidemiol 37(6):1304–1313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schüz J et al (2006) Cellular phones, cordless phones, and the risks of glioma and meningioma (Interphone Study Group, Germany). Am J Epidemiol 163(6):512–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hardell L, Hallquist A, Mild KH, Carlberg M, Påhlson A, Lilja A (2002) Cellular and cordless telephones and the risk for brain tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev Off J Eur Cancer Prev Organ ECP 11(4):377–386Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Auvinen A, Hietanen M, Luukkonen R, Koskela R-S (2002) Brain tumors and salivary gland cancers among cellular telephone users. Epidemiol Camb Mass 13(3):356–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hardell L et al (2004) No association between the use of cellular or cordless telephones and salivary gland tumours. Occup Environ Med 61(8):675–679CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sadetzki S et al (2008) Cellular phone use and risk of benign and malignant parotid gland tumors—a nationwide case–control study. Am J Epidemiol 167(4):457–467CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hardell L, Eriksson M, Carlberg M, Sundström C, Mild KH (2005) Use of cellular or cordless telephones and the risk for non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 78(8):625–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Linet MS et al (2006) Cellular telephones and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Int J Cancer 119(10):2382–2388CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stang A, Anastassiou G, Ahrens W, Bromen K, Bornfeld N, Jöckel KH (2001) The possible role of radiofrequency radiation in the development of uveal melanoma. Epidemiol Camb Mass 12(1):7–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Ohlson C-G, Westberg H, Eriksson M, Hansson K (2007) Mild, “use of cellular and cordless telephones and risk of testicular cancer”. Int J Androl 30(2):115–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Aydin D et al (2011) Mobile phone use and brain tumors in children and adolescents: a multicenter case–control study. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(16):1264–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson K (2010) Mild, “mobile phone use and the risk for malignant brain tumors: a case–control study on deceased cases and controls”. Neuroepidemiology 35(2):109–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Takebayashi T et al (2008) Mobile phone use, exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic field, and brain tumour: a case–control study. Br J Cancer 98(3):652–659CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    INTERPHONE Study Group (2010) Brain tumour risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case–control study. Int J Epidemiol 39(3):675–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    INTERPHONE Study Group (2011) Acoustic neuroma risk in relation to mobile telephone use: results of the INTERPHONE international case–control study. Cancer Epidemiol 35(5):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morgan RW, Kelsh MA, Zhao K, Exuzides KA, Heringer S, Negrete W (2000) Radiofrequency exposure and mortality from cancer of the brain and lymphatic/hematopoietic systems. Epidemiol Camb Mass 11(2):118–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Johansen C, Boice J, McLaughlin J, Olsen J (2001) Cellular telephones and cancer—a nationwide cohort study in Denmark. J Natl Cancer Inst 93(3):203–207CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schüz J, Jacobsen R, Olsen JH, Boice JD, McLaughlin JK, Johansen C (2006) Cellular telephone use and cancer risk: update of a nationwide Danish cohort. J Natl Cancer Inst 98(23):1707–1713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Frei P, Poulsen AH, Johansen C, Olsen JH, Steding-Jessen M, Schüz J (2011) Use of mobile phones and risk of brain tumours: update of Danish cohort study. BMJ 343:d6387CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Levis AG, Minicuci N, Ricci P, Gennaro V, Garbisa S (2011) Mobile phones and head tumours. The discrepancies in cause–effect relationships in the epidemiological studies—how do they arise? Environ Health Glob Access Sci Source 10:59Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Hansson K (2013) Mild, “use of mobile phones and cordless phones is associated with increased risk for glioma and acoustic neuroma. Pathophysiol Off J Int Soc Pathophysiol 20(2):85–110Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Myung S-K et al (2009) Mobile phone use and risk of tumors: a meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 27(33):5565–5572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lahkola A, Tokola K, Auvinen A (2006) Meta-analysis of mobile phone use and intracranial tumors. Scand J Work Environ Health 32(3):171–177CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hardell L, Carlberg M, Söderqvist F, Hansson K (2008) Mild, “meta-analysis of long-term mobile phone use and the association with brain tumours”. Int J Oncol 32(5):1097–1103PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kan P, Simonsen SE, Lyon JL, Kestle JRW (2008) Cellular phone use and brain tumor: a meta-analysis. J Neurooncol 86(1):71–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Repacholi MH et al (2012) Systematic review of wireless phone use and brain cancer and other head tumors. Bioelectromagnetics 33(3):187–206CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mugambi MN, Musekiwa A, Lombard M, Young T, Blaauw R (2013) Association between funding source, methodological quality and research outcomes in randomized controlled trials of synbiotics, probiotics and prebiotics added to infant formula: a systematic review. BMC Med Res Methodol 13:137CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wells G, Shea B, Peterson JW (2017) The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Google search. Accessed 17 Jan 2017Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Coureau G, Leffondre K, Gruber A, Bouvier G, Baldi I (2015) Author’s response: Re ‘mobile phone use and brain tumours in the CERENAT case–control study’. Occup Environ Med 72(1):79–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schlehofer B et al (1990) Environmental risk factors for sporadic acoustic neuroma (Interphone Study Group, Germany). Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl 43(11):1741–1747Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hill AB (1965) The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58:295–300PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Khurana VG, Teo C, Kundi M, Hardell L, Carlberg M (2009) Cell phones and brain tumors: a review including the long-term epidemiologic data. Surg Neurol 72(3):205–215Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Valentini E, Ferrara M, Presaghi F, De Gennaro L, Gennaro LD, Curcio G (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of psychomotor effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields. Occup Environ Med 67(10):708–716CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Valentini E, Curcio G, Moroni F, Ferrara M, De Gennaro L, Bertini M (2007) Neurophysiological effects of mobile phone electromagnetic fields on humans: a comprehensive review. Bioelectromagnetics 28(6):415–432CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Christensen HC, Schüz J, Kosteljanetz M, Poulsen HS, Thomsen J, Johansen C (2004) Cellular telephone use and risk of acoustic neuroma. Am J Epidemiol 159(3):277–283CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Christensen HC et al (2005) Cellular telephones and risk for brain tumors: a population-based, incident case–control study. Neurology 64(7):1189–1195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lönn S, Ahlbom A, Hall P, Feychting M (2004) Mobile phone use and the risk of acoustic neuroma. Epidemiol Camb Mass 15(6):653–659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Klaeboe L, Blaasaas KG, Tynes T (2007) Use of mobile phones in Norway and risk of intracranial tumours. Eur J Cancer Prev Off J Eur Cancer Prev Organ ECP 16(2):158–164Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Hepworth SJ, Schoemaker MJ, Muir KR, Swerdlow AJ, van Tongeren MJA, McKinney PA (2006) Mobile phone use and risk of glioma in adults: case–control study. BMJ 332(7546):883–887CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Schüz J et al (2011) Long-term mobile phone use and the risk of vestibular schwannoma: a Danish nationwide cohort study. Am J Epidemiol 174(4):416–422CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manya Prasad
    • 1
    Email author
  • Prachi Kathuria
    • 2
  • Pallavi Nair
    • 2
  • Amit Kumar
    • 2
  • Kameshwar Prasad
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Community MedicinePostgraduate Institute of Medical SciencesRohtakIndia
  2. 2.Department of NeurologyAll India Institute of Medical SciencesNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations