Advertisement

Neurological Sciences

, Volume 37, Issue 10, pp 1713–1721 | Cite as

Italian normative data for a stroke specific cognitive screening tool: the Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS)

  • M. Mancuso
  • V. Varalta
  • L. Sardella
  • D. Capitani
  • P. Zoccolotti
  • G. Antonucci
  • the Italian OCS Group
Original Article

Abstract

Cognitive deficits occur in most stroke patients and cognitive impairment is an important predictor of adverse long term outcome. However, current screening measures, such as the Mini Mental State Examination or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, do not provide information tuned for evaluating the impact of cognitive impairment in the early phase after stroke. The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS) represents an important new development in this regard. The OCS is now available for assessment of Italian individuals and the aim of this study is to standardize the OCS on a large sample of healthy Italian participants stratified for age, gender and education level. Results confirmed the influence of these factors in several of the OCS tasks. Age-, education- and gender-adjusted norms are provided for the ten sub-tests of the test. The availability of normative data represents an important prerequite for the reliable use of OCS with stroke patients.

Keywords

Stroke Cognitive assessment Oxford Cognitive Screen Normative data Aphasia Neglect 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank late Professor Glyn Humphreys for his inspiration.

The Italian OCS Group: L. Abbruzzese, Rehabilitation Center, Terranuova Bracciolini, Arezzo, Italy; C. Fonte, Department of Neuroscience Biomedicine and Movement, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; G. V. La Monica, Department of Neuroscience Biomedicine and Movement, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; F. Meneghello, Department Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, Foundation Hospital San Camillo, Venice, Italy; M. Pallotta, Department of Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Neuropsychology Centre, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Rome, Italy; F. Pirrotta, Rehabilitation Center, Terranuova Bracciolini, Arezzo, Italy; N. Smania, Department of Neuroscience Biomedicine and Movement, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary material

10072_2016_2650_MOESM1_ESM.docx (96 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 95 kb)
10072_2016_2650_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (16 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 16 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ (2007) Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis 23:408–416. doi: 10.1159/000101464 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rasquin SM, Verhey FR, Lousberg R, Lodder J (2005) Cognitive performance after first ever stroke related to progression of vascular brain damage: a 2 year follow up CT scan study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 76:1075–1079. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.055541 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tatemichi TK, Desmond DW, Stern Y, Paik M, Sano M, Bagiella E (1994) Cognitive impairment after stroke: frequency, patterns, and relationship to functional abilities. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 57(2):202–207CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bickerton WL, Riddoch MJ, Samson D, Balani AB, Mistry B, Humphreys GW (2012) Systematic assessment of apraxia and functional predictions from the Birmingham Cognitive Screen. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 83:513–521CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bickerton WL, Samson D, Williamson J, Humphreys GW (2011) Separating forms of neglect using the Apples Test: validation and functional prediction in chronic and acute stroke. Neuropsychology 25:567–580CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards DF, Hahn MG, Baum CM, Perlmutter MS, Sheedy C, Dromerick AW (2006) Screening patients with stroke for rehabilitation needs: validation of the post-stroke rehabilitation guidelines. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20:42–48CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Humphreys GW, Bickerton WL, Samson D, Riddoch MJ (2012) BCoS Cognitive Screen. Psychology Press, HoveGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rasquin SM, Welter J, van Heugten CM (2013) Course of cognitive functioning during stroke rehabilitation. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 23:811–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, van der Worp HB, Jansen BP, Algra A et al (2005) The prognostic value of domain-specific cognitive abilities in acute first-ever stroke. Neurology 64:821–827CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Clarke P, Marshall V, Black SE, Colantonio A (2002) Well-being after stroke in Canadian seniors: findings from the Canadian Study of Health and Ageing. Stroke 33:1016–1021CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hochstenbach JB, Anderson PG, van Limbeek J, Mulder TT (2001) Is there a relation between neuropsychologic variables and quality of life after stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1360–1366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hofgren C, Björkdahl A, Esbjörnsson E, Sunnerhagen KS (2007) Recovery after stroke: cognition, ADL function and return to work. Acta Neurol Scand 115:73–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hommel M, Miguel ST, Naegele B, Gonnet N, Jaillard A (2009) Cognitive determinants of social functioning after a first ever mild to moderate stroke at vocational age. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 80:876–880. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2008.169672 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pedersen PM, Jorgensen HS, Nakavama H et al (1996) General cognitive function in acute stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. J Neuro Rehabil 10:153–158Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zinn S, Dudley TK, Bosworth HB, Hoenig HM, Duncan PW, Horner RD (2004) The effect of poststroke cognitive impairment on rehabilitation process and functional out- come. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:1084–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.10.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scholte op Reimer WJ, de Haan RJ, Rijnders PT, Limburg M, van den Bos GA (1998) The burden of caregiving in partners of long-term stroke survivors. Stroke 29(8):1605–1611. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.29.8.1605 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hachinski V, Iadecola C, Petersen RC, Breteler MM, Nyenhuis DL, Black SE, Powers WJ, DeCarli C, Merino JG, Kalaria RN, Vinters HV, Holtzman DM, Rosenberg GA, Wallin A, Dichgans M, Marler JR, Leblanc GG (2006) National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke-Canadian Stroke Network vascular cognitive impairment harmonization standards. Stroke 37:2220–2241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Miceli G, Bottini G, Cerri C et al. (2012) Complicanze psicocognitive dell’ictus. In: Pierrel Research Italy SpA (ed) SPREAD stroke prevention and educational awareness diffusion. Ictus cerebrale: linee guida italiane di prevenzione e trattamento, 7th edn. Pierrel Research Italy, Milan, pp 100–111Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Miller EL, Murray L, Richards L, Zorowitz RD, Bakas T, Clark P, American Heart Association on Cardiovascular Nursing and the Stroke Council et al (2010) Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 41:2402–2448. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181e7512b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dong Y, Venketasubramanian N, Chan BP, Sharma VK, Slavin MJ, Collinson SL, Sachdev P, Chan YH, Chen CL (2012) Brief screening tests during acute admission in patients with mild stroke are predictive of vascular cognitive impairment 3–6 months after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 83:580–585CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Zandvoort MJ, Kessels RP, Nys GM, de Haan EH, Kappelle LJ (2005) Early neuropsychological evaluation in patients with ischaemic stroke provides valid information. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 107:385–392. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2004.10.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van der Zwaluw CS, Valentijn SA, Nieuwenhuis-Mark R, Rasquin SM (2011) van Heugten CM Cognitive functioning in the acute phase poststroke: a predictor of discharge destination? J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 20:549–555. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2010.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, Jansen BP, Kappelle LJ, de Haan EH (2005) Restrictions of the Mini-Mental State Examination in acute stroke. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 20:623–629. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2005.04.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, Charbonneau S, Whitehead V, Collin I et al (2005) The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:695–699. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pasi M, Salvadori E, Poggesi A, Inzitari D, Pantoni L (2013) Factors predicting the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) applicability and performances in a stroke unit. J Neurol 260:1518–1526. doi: 10.1007/s00415-012-6819-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, Bickerton WL, Humphreys GW (2015) The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): validation of a stroke-specific short cognitive screening tool. Psychol Assess 27:883–894CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Magni E, Binetti G, Bianchetti A, Rozzini R, Trabucchi M (1996) Mini-Mental State Examination: a normative study in Italian elderly population. Eur J Neurol 3:198–202. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.1996.tb00423.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ramrattan RS, Wolfs RC, Panda-Jonas S, Jonas JB, Bakker D, Pols HA et al (2001) Prevalence and causes of visual field loss in the elderly and associations with impairment in daily functioning: the Rotterdam Study. Arch Ophthalmol 119:1788–1794. doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.12.1788 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Burani C, Arduino LS (2004) Stress regularity or consistency? Reading aloud Italian polysyllables with different stress patterns. Brain Lang 90:318–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bertinetto PM, Burani C, Laudanna A, Marconi C, Ratti D, Rolando C, et al (2005) CoLFIS (Corpus e Lessico di Frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto) [Corpus and Frequency Lexicon of Written Italian]. http://www.istc.cnr.it/grouppage/databases. Accessed 3 June 2016
  31. 31.
    Chechlacz M, Rotshtein P, Roberts KL, Bickerton WL, Lau JK, Humphreys GW (2012) The prognosis of allocentric and egocentric neglect: evidence from clinical scans. PLoS One 7:e47821CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Burani C, Barca L, Ellis AW (2006) Orthographic complexity and word naming in Italian: some words are more transparent than others. Psychon Bull Rev 13:346–352. doi: 10.3758/BF03193855 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Mancuso
    • 1
  • V. Varalta
    • 2
  • L. Sardella
    • 1
  • D. Capitani
    • 3
  • P. Zoccolotti
    • 4
    • 5
  • G. Antonucci
    • 4
    • 5
  • the Italian OCS Group
  1. 1.Rehabilitation CenterTerranuova BraccioliniItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neuroscience Biomedicine and Movement, Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research CenterUniversity of VeronaVeronaItaly
  3. 3.ESTAR Sud Est, ICT-DepartmentGrossetoItaly
  4. 4.Department of PsychologySapienza University of RomeRomeItaly
  5. 5.Neuropsychology CentreIRCCS Santa Lucia FoundationRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations