Advertisement

Neurological Sciences

, Volume 36, Issue 12, pp 2185–2190 | Cite as

Normative data for the ACE-R in an Italian population sample

  • Martina PigliautileEmail author
  • Francesca Chiesi
  • Sonia Rossetti
  • Manuela Conestabile della Staffa
  • Monica Ricci
  • Stefano Federici
  • Dora Chiloiro
  • Caterina Primi
  • Patrizia Mecocci
Original Article

Abstract

The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R) is a brief cognitive screening instrument also proposed to detect mild cognitive impairment, a high-risk condition for Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia. In this study, we report normative data on the ACE-R-Italian version, collected on a sample of 264 Italian healthy subjects aging between 60 and 93 years, and with a formal education from 1 to 19 years. The global normal cognition was established in accordance with the Italian version of the Mini–Mental State Examination score and with exclusion criteria derived by a consensus process. Linear regression analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of age, gender, and education on the ACE-R total performance score. We provide correction grids to adjust raw scores and equivalent scores with cut-off value to allow comparison between ACE-R performance and others neuropsychological test scores that can be administered to the same subject.

Keywords

ACE-R Normative data Screening Dementia 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the control subjects and all the physicians at the Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital in Perugia and the psychologists at the Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Adult and Developmental Ages in Taranto for their involvement in this study.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Mioshi E, Dawson K, Mitchell J, Arnold R, Hodges JR (2006) The Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (ACE-R): a brief cognitive test battery for dementia screening. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 21:1078–1085. doi: 10.1002/gps.1610 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mathuranath PS, Nestor PJ, Berrios GE et al (2000) A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 55:1613–1620. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000434309.85312.19 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Davies RR, Larner AJ (2013) Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) and its Revision (ACE-R). In: Larner AJ (ed) Cognitive screening instruments. A practical approach, 1st edn. Springer, London, pp 61–77Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dudas RB, Berrios GE, Hodges JR (2005) The Addenbrooke’s cognitive examination (ACE) in the differential diagnosis of early dementias versus affective disorder. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 13:218–226. doi: 10.1097/00019442-200503000-00007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crawford S, Whitnall L, Robertson J, Evans JJ (2012) A systematic review of the accuracy and clinical utility of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised in the diagnosis of dementia. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 27:659–669. doi: 10.1002/gps.2771 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Larner AJ, Mitchell AJ (2014) A meta-analysis of the accuracy of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE) and the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised (ACE-R) in the detection of dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 26:555–563. doi: 10.1017/S1041610213002329 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) (2006) Management of patients with dementia. A national clinical guideline. SIGN publication 86. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign86.pdf. Accessed 9 Dec 2014
  8. 8.
    Pigliautile M, Ricci M et al (2011) Validation study of the Italian Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised in a young-old and old-old population. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 32:301–307. doi: 10.1159/000334657 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barletta-Rodolfi C, Ghidoni E, Gasparini F (2011) KIT del Neuropsicologo Italiano, 1st edn. Dynamicom Edizioni, MilanoGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marcoulides GA, Hershberger SL (1997) Multivariate statistical methods. A first course. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahawaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wilks SS (1941) Determination of sample sizes for setting tolerance limits. Ann Math Stat 12:91–96. doi: 10.1214/aoms/1177731788 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Velayudhan L, Ryu SH, Raczek M, Philpot M, Lindesay J, Critchfield M, Livingston G (2014) Review of brief cognitive tests for patients with suspected dementia. Int Psychogeriatr 26:1247–1262. doi: 10.1017/S1041610214000416 PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fernández AL, Marcopulos BA (2008) A comparison of normative data for the Trail Making Test from several countries: equivalence of norms and considerations for interpretation. Scand J Psychol 49:239–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2008.00637.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosselli M, Ardila A (2003) The impact of culture and education on nonverbal neuropsychological measurements: a critical review. Brain Cogn 52:326–333. doi: 10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00170-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Amaral-Carvalho V, Caramelli P (2012) Normative data for healthy middle-aged and elderly performance on the Addenbrooke Cognitive Examination-Revised. Cogn Behav Neurol 25:72–76. doi: 10.1097/WNN.0b013e318259594b CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kwak YT, Yang Y, Kim GW (2010) Korean Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination Revised (K-ACER) for differential diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease and subcortical ischemic vascular dementia. Geriatr Gerontol Int 10:295–301. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00624.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yoshida H, Terada S, Honda H, Kishimoto Y, Takeda N, Oshima E, Hirayama K, Yokota O, Uchitomi Y (2012) Validation of the revised Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination (ACE-R) for detecting mild cognitive impairment and dementia in a Japanese population. Int Psychogeriatr 24:28–37. doi: 10.1017/S1041610211001190 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    World Health Organization, U.S. National Institute on Aging, U.S. National Institute of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2011) Global health and aging. NIH Publication No 11-7737 http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf. Accessed 3 March 2015
  20. 20.
    Mitchell AJ (2013) The Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE): an update on its diagnostic validity for cognitive disorders. In: Larner AJ (ed) Cognitive Screening Instruments. Springer, London, pp 15–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nieuwenhuis-Mark RE (2010) The death knoll for the MMSE: has it outlived its purpose? J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol 23:151–157. doi: 10.1177/0891988710363714 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Williams JM (1988) Everyday cognition and the ecological validity of intellectual and neuropsychological tests. In: Williams JM, Long CJ (eds) Cognitive approaches to neuropsychology, 1st edn. Plenum Press, New York, pp 123–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Newman JC, Feldman R (2011) Copyright and open access at the bedside. N Engl J Med 365:2447–2449. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1110652 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hsieh S, Schubert S, Hoon C, Mioshi E, Hodges JR (2013) Validation of the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 36:242–250. doi: 10.1159/000351671 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Italia 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martina Pigliautile
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesca Chiesi
    • 2
  • Sonia Rossetti
    • 3
  • Manuela Conestabile della Staffa
    • 1
  • Monica Ricci
    • 4
  • Stefano Federici
    • 5
  • Dora Chiloiro
    • 3
  • Caterina Primi
    • 2
  • Patrizia Mecocci
    • 1
  1. 1.Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Department of MedicineUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Neuroscience, Psychology, Drug Research, and Child’s Health (NEUROFARBA)-Section of PsychologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  3. 3.Unit of Clinical PsychologyAzienda Sanitaria LocaleTarantoItaly
  4. 4.ARC Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its DisordersMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Social and Human Sciences and Education, Department of PhilosophyUniversity of PerugiaPerugiaItaly

Personalised recommendations